Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of piezocision-assisted orthodontics on root resorption and alveolar bone: a prospective observational study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the impact of orthodontic treatment combined with piezocision (OT-PC) on root structure and alveolar bone.

Materials and methods

Twelve adults were treated with OT-PC. Pre- and post-treatment CBCT examinations evaluated apical root resorption (ARR) and alveolar bone height and thickness changes. Pre- and post-treatment differences were compared using one-sample t test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

ARRs were generalized and significantly more severe in both anterior sextants compared with posterior sextants. Bone thickness decreased significantly in the maxilla at mid-root and apex areas. The majority of mandibular alveolar bone dehiscences occurred on the buccal aspect at the mid-root level, especially where thickness was less than 0.3 mm. Overall bone height decreased twice as much on the buccal aspect (1.43 mm, P < 0.001) compared with the lingual aspect (0.67 mm, P = 0.001), most significantly in the lower incisors, where the average median loss was 2.10 mm (P = 0.003).

Conclusion

OT-PC causes minor negative effects on both alveolar bone and root resorption.

Clinical relevance

Orthodontic treatment combined with piezocision causes minor negative effects on periodontal support. Nevertheless, mild bone height loss on the buccal aspect of the mandibular teeth and root resorption in both anterior sextants have been detected with this new treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dibart S, Sebaoun JD, Surmenian J (2009) Piezocision: a minimally invasive, periodontally accelerated orthodontic tooth movement procedure. Compend Contin Educ Dent 30:342–344 346, 348–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gibreal O, Hajeer MY, Brad B (2018) Efficacy of piezocision-based flapless corticotomy in the orthodontic correction of severely crowded lower anterior teeth: a controlled trial. Eur J Orthod

  3. Charavet C, Lecloux G, Bruwier A, Rompen E, Maes N, Limme M, Lambert F (2016) Localized piezoelectric alveolar decortication for orthodontic treatment in adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res 95:1003–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Uribe F, Davoody L, Mehr R, Jayaratne YS, Almas K, Sobue T et al (2017) Efficiency of piezotome-corticision assisted orthodontics in alleviating mandibular anterior crowding-a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 39:595–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abbas NH, Sabet NE, Hassan IT (2016) Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 149:473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yi J, Xiao J, Li Y, Li X, Zhao Z (2017) Efficacy of piezocision on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 87:491–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffmann S, Papadopoulos N, Visel D, Visel T, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Prager TM (2017) Influence of piezotomy and osteoperforation of the alveolar process on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. J Orofac Orthop 78:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garlock DT, Buschang PH, Araujo EA, Behrents RG, Kim KB (2016) Evaluation of marginal alveolar bone in the anterior mandible with pretreatment and posttreatment computed tomography in nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 149:192–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma ZG, Yang C, Fang B, Xia YH, Mao LX, Feng YM (2015) Three-D imaging of dental alveolar bone change after fixed orthodontic treatment in patients with periodontitis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:2385–2391

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy DB, Joondeph DR, Osterberg SK, Little RM (1983) The effect of extraction and orthodontic treatment on dentoalveolar support. Am J Orthod 84:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aksakalli S, Calik B, Kara B (2015) Ezirganhi S. Accelerated tooth movement with piezocision and its periodontal-transversal effects in patients with Class II malocclusion, Angle Orthod

    Google Scholar 

  12. Patterson BM, Dalci O, Papadopoulou AK, Madukuri S, Mahon J, Petocz P, Spahr A, Darendeliler MA (2017) Effect of piezocision on root resorption associated with orthodontic force: a microcomputed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 151:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cangialosi TJ, Riolo ML, Owens SE Jr, Dykhouse VJ, Moffitt AH, Grubb JE, Greco PM, English JD, James RD (2004) The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 125:270–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Strippoli JDR, Schmittbuhl M, Voyer R, Rompré P, Nishio C (2017) Pain and quality of life in patients undergoing guided piezocorticision-assisted orthodontic treatment. J Clin Orthod 51:792–799

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kook YA, Kim G, Kim Y (2012) Comparison of alveolar bone loss around incisors in normal occlusion samples and surgical skeletal class III patients. Angle Orthod 82:645–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Levander E, Malmgren O (1988) Evaluation of the risk of root resorption during orthodontic treatment: a study of upper incisors. Eur J Orthod 10:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lund H, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG (2010) Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal bone level during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 80:466–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dudic A, Giannopoulou C, Leuzinger M, Kiliaridis S (2009) Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 135:434–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH (2010) Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 137:S100–S108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ren H, Chen J, Deng F, Zheng L, Liu X, Dong Y (2013) Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for detecting simulated apical root resorption. Angle Orthod 83:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ponder SN, Benavides E, Kapila S, Hatch NE (2013) Quantification of external root resorption by low- vs high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography: a volumetric and linear analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 143:77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, Covell DA Jr (2011) Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:734–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leung CC, Palomo L, Griffith R, Hans MG (2010) Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 137:S109–S119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun Z, Smith T, Kortam S, Kim DG, Tee BC, Fields H (2011) Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 139:e117–e127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Patcas R, Muller L, Ullrich O, Peltomaki T (2012) Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 141:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Samandara A, Papageorgiou SN, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I, Kavvadia-Tsatala S, Papadopoulos MA (2018) Evaluation of orthodontically induced external root resorption following orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod

  27. Jäger F, Mah JK, Bumann A (2017) Peridental bone changes after orthodontic tooth movement with fixed appliances: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. Angle Orthod 87(5):672–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Proffit WRFHJ, Sarver DM (2012) Contemporary orthodontics, 5th edn. Elveseir Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sameshima GT, Sinclair PM (2001) Predicting and preventing root resorption: part I. Diagnostic factors Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119:505–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaley J, Phillips C (1991) Factors related to root resorption in edgewise practice. Angle Orthod 61:125–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Roscoe MG, Meira JB, Cattaneo PM (2015) Association of orthodontic force system and root resorption: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 147:610–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Khoo E, Alansari S, Nervina J (2017) Piezocision and root resorption: a biased conclusion? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 151:1020–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Iglesias-Linares A, Hartsfield JK Jr (2017) Cellular and molecular pathways leading to external root resorption. J Dent Res 96:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Molen AD (2010) Considerations in the use of cone-beam computed tomography for buccal bone measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 137:S130–S135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Qu X, Liu Z, Wang Y, Fang Y, Du M, He H (2017) Dentofacial traits in association with lower incisor alveolar cancellous bone thickness: a multiple regression analysis. Angle Orthod 87:409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mandall NA, Vine S, Hulland R, Worthington HV (2006) The impact of fixed orthodontic appliances on daily life. Community Dent Health 23:69–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study would not have been possible without financial support from the Associate Dean of Research funds at the Université de Montréal.

Funding statement

This study was financial supported by the Associate Dean of Research Funds, Faculty of Dentistry, Université de Montréal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clarice Nishio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) warrants that this study is original and free of conflict of interest, does not infringe upon any copyright or other proprietary right of any third party, is not under consideration by another journal and has not been published previously.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethics committee of the Université de Montréal (15–002-CERES-P, clinical trial number NCT02359760, Assessment of Piezoelectric Periodontal Surgery Effects on Orthodontic Treatment: a Prospective Pilot Study) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strippoli, J., Schmittbuhl, M., Durand, R. et al. Impact of piezocision-assisted orthodontics on root resorption and alveolar bone: a prospective observational study. Clin Oral Invest 25, 4341–4348 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03282-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03282-9

Keywords

Navigation