Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of dentin bond durability of a universal adhesive and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to compare dentin bond durability under different degradation conditions between two etch-and-rinse (ER) systems and a universal adhesive in ER mode.

Method

This study used a universal adhesive [Scotchbond Universal (SU)], a three-step ER adhesive [Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SM)], and a two-step ER adhesive [Single Bond Plus (SB)]. A phosphoric acid-etching agent was applied to bovine dentin prior to the application of either a primer or the adhesive. After acid etching, bonding procedures were conducted. The specimens were divided into three group classes: (1) subjected to 10,000, 30,000, or 50,000 thermal cycles (TC); (2) stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 6 months or 1 year (WS); and (3) stored in distilled water for 24 h (baseline). Shear bond strength (SBS) tests were conducted.

Results

SB showed a higher baseline SBS than the other adhesives. Defining the baseline SBS value for each adhesive system as 100%, TC groups ranged from 56.1 to 70.3% for SM, from 98.4 to 103.7% for SB, and from 120.3 to 126.7% for SU. WS groups ranged from 66.2 to 71.4% for SM, from 98.1 to 103.3% for SB, and from 102.5 to 118.1% for SU.

Conclusions

Although SB showed relatively stable dentin bond performance under all degradation conditions, SM showed decreased dentin SBS with prolonged degradation. SU did not show any significant decrease in SBS from the baseline under any degradation condition.

Clinical relevance

The universal adhesive showed comparable adhesive performance with the two-step ER adhesive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miyazaki M, Tsujimoto A, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Platt JA (2014) Important compositional characteristics in the clinical use of adhesive systems. J Oral Sci 56:1–9. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.56.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A (2011) State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 27:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL (2011) State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 27:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N (1991) Hybrid layer as dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 3:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Sano H, Tay FR, Oguchi H, Araki Y, Kubota M (2002) Over-etching effects on micro-tensile bond strength and failure patterns for two dentin bonding systems. J Dent 30:99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00004-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Kaga M, Oguchi H (2003) In vitro degradation of resin-dentin bonds analyzed by microtensile bond test, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Biomaterials 24:3795–3803. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00262-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J (2019) Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 107:2121–2131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater 32:e9–e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Suzuki T, Scheidel DD, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of different pre-etching times on fatigue strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 124:210–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacker-Guhr S, Sander J, Luehrs AK (2019) How “universal” is adhesion? Shear bond strength of multi-mode adhesives to enamel and dentin. J Adhes Dent 21:87–95. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a41974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ISO 29022 (2013) 2013 Dentistry-Adhesion-Notched-edge shear bond strength test, 1st edn. International Organization for Standardization, ISO, Geneva, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yassen GH, Platt JA, Hara AT (2011) Bovine teeth as substitute for human teeth in dental research: a review of literature. J Oral Sci 53:273–282. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.53.273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Takamizawa T, Scheidel DD, Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL, Tsujimoto A, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of frequency on shear fatigue strength of resin composite to enamel bonds using self-etch adhesives. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 62:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84:118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gale MS, Darvell BW (1999) Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 27:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Suzuki S, Takamiazawa T, Imai A, Tsujimoto A, Sai K, Takimoto M, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2018) Bond durability of universal adhesive to bovine enamel using self-etch mode. Clin Oral Investig 22:1113–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2196-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wakasa K, Yamaki M, Matsui A (1995) Calculation models for average stress and plastic deformation zone size of bonding area in dentine bonding systems. Dent Mater J 14:152–165. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.14.152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2014) Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. Oper Dent 39:489–499. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-203-LR

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Muñoz MA, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigão J (2015) Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives. Dent Mater 31:e236–e246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujiwara S, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Nakatsuka T, Miyazaki M (2018) Effect of double-layer application on bond quality of adhesive systems. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 77:501–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sai K, Shimamura Y, Takamizawa T, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Endo H, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of degradation conditions on dentin bonding durability of three universal adhesives. J Dent 54:56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J (2005) Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: A systematic review. Dent Mater 21:895–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Torkabadi S, Nakajima M, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J (2008) Bonding durability of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing one-step adhesives to dentin surrounded by bonded enamel. J Dent 36:80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Dijken JW (2013) A randomized controlled 5-year prospective study of two HEMA-free adhesives, a 1-step self-etching and a 3-step etch-and -rinse, in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 29:e271–e280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Takahashi M, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J (2011) Long-term evaluation of water sorption and ultimate tensile strength of HEMA-containing/-free one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent 39:506–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Dijken JW, Pallesen U (2008) Long-term dentin retention of etch-and -rinse and self-etch adhesives and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 24:915–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mitra SB, Lee CY, Bui HT, Tantbirojn D, Rusin RP (2009) Long-term adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paste-liquid resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater 25:459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sidhu SK (2010) Clinical evaluations of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Dent Mater 24:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sezinando A, Perdigão J, Ceballos L (2017) Long-term in vitro adhesion of polyalkenoate-based adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 19:305–316. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a38895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sezinando A, Serrano ML, Pérez VM, Muñoz RA, Ceballos L, Perdigão J (2016) Chemical adhesion of polyalkenoate-based adhesives to hydroxyapatite. J Adhes Dent 18:257–265. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a36222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK (2002) Analysis of the dentin-resin interface by use laser raman spectroscopy. Dent Mater 18:576–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00093-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hiraishi N, Tochio N, Kigawa T, Otsuki M, Tagami J (2013) Monomer-collagen interactions studied by saturation transfer difference NMR. J Dent Res 92:284–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512474310

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Operative Dentistry, Nihon University School of Dentistry, 1-8-13, Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8310, Japan

    Mami Kawazu, Toshiki Takamizawa, Eizo Hirokane, Akimasa Tsujimoto, Tomohiko Tamura & Masashi Miyazaki

  2. Department of General Dentistry, Creighton University School of Dentistry, Omaha, NE, USA

    Wayne W. Barkmeier & Mark A. Latta

Authors
  1. Mami Kawazu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toshiki Takamizawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eizo Hirokane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akimasa Tsujimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tomohiko Tamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wayne W. Barkmeier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mark A. Latta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Masashi Miyazaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiki Takamizawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript certify that they have no proprietary, financial, or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that is presented in this article.

Funding

This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, No. 19K10158 and 17K11716, from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. This project was also supported in part by the Sato Fund and by a grant from the Dental Research Center of the Nihon University School of Dentistry, Japan.

Ethical approval

This study does not contain any studies with human participants and subjects or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawazu, M., Takamizawa, T., Hirokane, E. et al. Comparison of dentin bond durability of a universal adhesive and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Clin Oral Invest 24, 2889–2897 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03153-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03153-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation