Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quick bonding using a universal adhesive

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to measure the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a new universal adhesive (UA) bonded to dentin following a quick bonding mode.

Materials and methods

The experimental UA ‘SKB-100,’ now commercialized as Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (‘C-UBq’; Kuraray Noritake), was investigated, with Scotchbond Universal (‘SBU’; 3M Oral Care) and the two-step self-etch (SE) adhesive Clearfil SE Bond 2 (‘C-SE2’; Kuraray Noritake) serving as references. The adhesives were employed separately in etch&rinse (E&R) and SE modes on each tooth half following a split-tooth design and following their respective instructions for use, except for C-UBq that besides the manufacturer’s instructed quick bonding mode was also applied and left untouched for 20 s prior to light curing (‘C-UBq_20s’) and for C-SE2 that was also applied in the E&R mode. μTBS of half of the specimens was measured upon 1 week (1w), with the other half tested after 6-month (6m) storage in distilled water at 37 °C. Data were statistically analyzed using linear mixed-effects modeling and three-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). The adhesive–dentin interfaces were ultrastructurally characterized by TEM.

Results

C-UBq revealed a significantly lower μTBS than C-SE2. The highest μTBS was recorded for C-UBq_20s_1w and C-SE2_1w, both when applied in E&R mode. However, μTBS of C-UBq_20s significantly decreased upon aging in both modes. C-SE2 presented the significantly highest ‘aged’ μTBS.

Conclusion

C-UBq applied in the quick bonding mode did not underperform to the UAs applied for 20 s. Superior bonding effectiveness was achieved by C-SE2 in SE and E&R bonding modes.

Clinical relevance

Extended application time of C-UBq improved solely its immediate but not aged bonding effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U (2014) Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 42(7):800–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K (2011) State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 27(1):17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A (2011) State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 27(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J (2005) Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel–dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater 21(10):895–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 28(26):3757–3785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Meerbeek B, Frankenberger R (2016) Editorial: The “etch-and-rinse” and “self-etch” camps. J Adhes Dent 18(6):463. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a37487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J (2012) Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 40(6):475–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, Van Meerbeek B (2014) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. Dent Mater 30(10):1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84(2):118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Carvalho RM, Rueggeberg FA, Agee KA, Carrilho M, Donnelly A, Garcia-Godoy F (2007) From dry bonding to water-wet bonding to ethanol-wet bonding. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer. Am J Dent 20(1):7–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tjaderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Tersariol IL, Geraldeli S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Carrilho MR, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2013) Optimizing dentin bond durability: control of collagen degradation by matrix metalloproteinases and cysteine cathepsins. Dent Mater 29(1):116–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Armstrong S, Breschi L, Ozcan M, Pfefferkorn F, Ferrari M, Van Meerbeek B (2017) Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (mu TBS) approach. Dent Mater 33(2):133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bedran-Russo AKB, Pereira PNR, Duarte WR, Drummond JL, Yamauchi M (2007) Application of crosslinkers to dentin collagen enhances the ultimate tensile strength. J Biomed Mater Res B 80b(1):268–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu Y, Tjaderhane L, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Li N, Mao J, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2011) Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res 90(8):953–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510391799

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Landuyt K, Snauwaert J, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2008) The role of HEMA in one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 24(10):1412–1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Matsumoto T, Minagi S, Osaka A, Van Landuyt K, Van Meerbeek B (2012) HEMA inhibits interfacial nano-layering of the functional monomer MDP. J Dent Res 91(11):1060–1065. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512460396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Landuyt KL, Cardoso MV, De Munck J, Peumans M, Mine A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2009) Optimization of the concentration of photo-initiator in a one-step self-etch adhesive. Dent Mater 25(8):982–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Kuroboshi M, Hayakawa S, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B (2015) Functional monomer impurity affects adhesive performance. Dent Mater 31(12):1493–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. GC Europe (2018) G-Premio Bond leaflets. https://cdn.gceurope.com/v1/PID/gpremiobond/leaflet/LFL_G-Premio_BOND_en.pdf. Accessed 01 Dec 2018

  20. Huang XQ, Pucci CR, Luo T, Breschi L, Pashley DH, Niu LN, Tay FR (2017) No-waiting dentine self-etch concept-Merit or hype. J Dent 62:54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuraray Noritake (2018) CLEARFIL Universal Bond quick brochure. https://kuraraydental.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/clearfil-universal-bond-quick-new-cap-brochure-sm.pdf. Accessed 01 Nov 2018

  22. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Influence of three specimen fixation modes on the micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater J 26(5):694–699. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G, Lopes A (1995) Field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res A 29(9):1111–1120. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Duke E, Eick J, Robinson S (1998) A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res 77(1):50–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345980770010501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2012) Meta-analytical review of parameters involved in dentin bonding. J Dent Res 91(4):351–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511431251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, Chen JH, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2015) Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine—old wine in new bottles? J Dent 43(5):525–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tjaderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Tersariol ILS, Geraldeli S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Carrilho M, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2013) Strategies to prevent hydrolytic degradation of the hybrid layer—a review. Dent Mater 29(10):999–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.016

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Montes MA, de Goes MF, da Cunha MR, Soares AB (2001) A morphological and tensile bond strength evaluation of an unfilled adhesive with low-viscosity composites and a filled adhesive in one and two coats. J Dent 29(6):435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00037-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahmed MH, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Yoshihara K, Van Meerbeek B (2019) Do universal adhesives benefit from an extra bonding layer? J Adhes Dent 21(2):117–132. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a42304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ermis RB, Ugurlu M, Ahmed MH, Van Meerbeek B (2019) Universal adhesives benefit from an extra hydrophobic adhesive layer when light cured beforehand. J Adhes Dent 21(2):179–188. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a42344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuraray Noritake (2014) Clearfil SE Bond 2; instructions for use. https://kuraraydental.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/clearfil_se_bond_2_bottles_ifu.pdf. Accessed 01 April 2014

  32. Minamino T, Mine A, Shintani A, Higashi M, Kawaguchi-Uemura A, Kabetani T, Hagino R, Imai D, Tajiri Y, Matsumoto M, Yatani H (2017) Advanced statistical analyses to reduce inconsistency of bond strength data. J Dent Res 96(12):1400–1405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517725691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2008) Effect of double-application or the application of a hydrophobic layer for improved efficacy of one-step self-etch systems in enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 33(5):564–570. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Taschner M, Kummerling M, Lohbauer U, Breschi L, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R (2014) Effect of double-layer application on dentin bond durability of one-step self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 39(4):416–426. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-168-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sartori N, Peruchi LD, Guimaraes JC, Silva SB, Monteiro S, Baratieri LN, Belli R (2013) Clinical effectiveness of a hydrophobic coating used in conjunction with a one-step self-etch adhesive: an 18-month evaluation. Oper Dent 38(3):249–257. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-014-C

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, Szesz AL, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH, Perdigao J (2014) Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the bonding efficacy of three universal adhesives. J Dent 42(5):595–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Perdigao J, Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2014) Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. Oper Dent 39(5):489–499. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-203-Lr

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Reis A, Albuquerque M, Peyoraro M, Mattei G, Bauer JRDO, Grande RHM, Klein-Junior CA, Baumhardt-Neto R, Loguercio AD (2008) Can the durability of one-step self-etch adhesives be improved by double application or by an extra layer of hydrophobic resin? J Dent 36(5):309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Perdigao J, Ceballos L, Giraldez I, Baracco B, Fuentes MV (2019) Effect of a hydrophobic bonding resin on the 36-month performance of a universal adhesive-a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02940-x

  40. Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Yildiz E, Yucel T, Vanherle G (1996) The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 9(4):167–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1993) Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72(10):1434–1442. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720101401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990) Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69(6):1240–1243. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690060301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990) Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 64(6):658–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90291-J

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang Y, Spencer P, Yao X, Brenda B (2007) Effect of solvent content on resin hybridization in wet dentin bonding. J Biomed Mater Res A 82(4):975–983. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31232

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83(6):454–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Mine A, Nakamura M, Minagi S, Osaka A, Suzuki K, Van Meerbeek B (2010) Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater 6(9):3573–3582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sai K, Takamizawa T, Imai A, Tsujimoto A, Ishii R, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2018) Influence of application time and etching mode of universal adhesives on enamel adhesion. J Adhes Dent 20(1):65–77. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a39913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yoshihara K, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B (2018) Etching efficacy of self-etching functional monomers. J Dent Res 97(9):1010–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518763606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kuraray Noritake (2017) CLEARFIL Universal Bond quick; safety data sheet. https://kuraraydental.com/wp-content/uploads/sds/chairside/usa/clearfil-universal-bond-quick-sds-usa.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2017

Download references

Acknowledgments

The companies Kuraray Noritake and 3M Oral Care are gratefully thanked for providing the materials employed and investigated.

Funding

M.H. Ahmed was appointed as PhD student at KU Leuven—BIOMAT, based on funding provided by the Ministry of Higher Education of Egypt.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Department of Oral Health Sciences, BIOMAT & UZ Leuven (University Hospitals Leuven), Dentistry, Leuven, Belgium

    Mohammed H. Ahmed, Benjamin Mercelis, Kirsten Van Landuyt, Marleen Peumans & Bart Van Meerbeek

  2. Tanta University, Department of Dental Biomaterials, Tanta, Egypt

    Mohammed H. Ahmed

  3. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Health Research Institute, Kagawa, Japan

    Kumiko Yoshihara

  4. Okayama University, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pathology & Experimental Medicine, Okayama, Japan

    Kumiko Yoshihara

Authors
  1. Mohammed H. Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kumiko Yoshihara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benjamin Mercelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kirsten Van Landuyt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marleen Peumans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bart Van Meerbeek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.H.A. performed the experiments and statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. K.Y. contributed substantially to the discussion and proofread the manuscript. B.M. contributed to the experiments. K.V.L. and M.P. consulted on the idea and proofread the manuscript. B.V.M. was responsible for the hypothesis and experimental design and contributed substantially to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bart Van Meerbeek.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Commission for Medical Ethics of the host institute under file number S57622.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consents were collected.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, M.H., Yoshihara, K., Mercelis, B. et al. Quick bonding using a universal adhesive. Clin Oral Invest 24, 2837–2851 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03149-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03149-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation