Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The precision of case difficulty and referral decisions: an innovative automated approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Endodontic treatment works as a successful treatment modality in several cases. However, it may fail due to some reasons unforeseeable by the dentist. Many failures can be prevented by carefully assessing the difficulty level of the case before initiating treatment or by referral to a specialist. This study presents an approach using machine learning to generate an algorithm which can help predict the difficulty level of the case and decide about a referral, with the help of the standard American Association of Endodontists (AAE) Endodontic Case Difficulty Assessment Form.

Materials and methods

Using the AAE Endodontic Case Difficulty Form after obtaining the patients’ consent, 500 potential root canal patients were diagnosed. The filled forms were assessed by two pre-calibrated endodontists, and, in cases of conflicting opinion, a third endodontist’s opinion was taken. Artificial neural network was used for generating the algorithm.

Results

Using 500 filled AAE forms, a sensitivity of 94.96% was achieved by the machine learning algorithm.

Conclusion

This study provides an option for automation to the conventional method of predicting the difficulty level of a case, thus increasing the speed of decision-making and referrals if necessary.

Clinical relevance

An AAE Endodontic Case Difficulty Assessment Form when utilized along with machine learning can assist general dentists in rapid assessment of the case difficulty. This is a helpful tool in developing countries, where endodontic treatment and referral guidelines are often neglected. It also helps to make difficulty level assessments easier for novice practitioners, when they are in doubt about the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reiser SJ, Reiser SJ. (1981) Medicine and the reign of technology. Cambridge University Press

  2. Foster KR, Koprowski R, Skufca JD (2014) Machine learning, medical diagnosis, and biomedical engineering research-commentary. Biomed Eng 13(1):94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carrotte P (2004) Endodontics: part 2 diagnosis and treatment planning. Br Dent J 197(5):231. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. https://www.aae.org/specialty/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/06/2006casedifficultyassessmentformb_edited2010.pdf . Accessed on 8 February 2019

  5. Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S (2017) Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2:230–243. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Han J, Pei J, Kamber M (2011) Data mining: concepts and techniques. Elsevier

  7. Kim EY, Lim KO, Rhee HS (2009) Predictive modeling of dental pain using neural network. Stud Health Technol Inform 146:745–746

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Käkilehto T, Salo S, Larmas M (2009) Data mining of clinical oral health documents for analysis of the longevity of different restorative materials in Finland. Int J Med Inform 78(12):e68–e74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Korhonen M, Gundagar M, Suni J, Salo S, Larmas M (2009) A practice-based study of the variation of diagnostics of dental caries in new and old patients of different ages. Caries Res 43(5):339–344. https://doi.org/10.1159/000231570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. https://firebase.google.com/. Assessed on 25/09/2018

  11. Deng N, Tian Y, Zhang C (2012) Support vector machines: optimization based theory, algorithms, and extensions. Chapman and Hall/CRC

  12. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A, Bengio Y (2016) Deep learning. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duchi J, Hazan E, Singer Y (2011) Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. J Mach Learn Res 12:2121–2159

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swartz DB, Skidmore AE, Griffin JA (1983) Twenty years of endodontic success and failure. J Endod 9(5):198–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80092-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chandra BS, Gopikrishna V (2014) ENDODONTIC PRACTICE. Wolters Kluwer India

  16. https://www.aae.org/specialty/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/06/educatorguidetocdaf.pdf. Accessed on 7/7/19

  17. Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC (eds) (2008). Ingle's endodontics 6. PMPH USA

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shivani Mallishery.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study has been approved by the appropriate Ethics Committee (Nair Hospital Dental College; Mumbai, India approval no. EC-84/CONS-09ND/2018). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mallishery, S., Chhatpar, P., Banga, K.S. et al. The precision of case difficulty and referral decisions: an innovative automated approach. Clin Oral Invest 24, 1909–1915 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03050-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03050-4

Keywords

Navigation