Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A chitosan-based irrigant improves the dislocation resistance of a mineral trioxide aggregate-resin hybrid root canal sealer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the effectiveness of root canal irrigation with chitosan on the dislocation resistance of a root canal sealer (MTA Fillapex) in vitro, measured by the push-out bond strength test.

Materials and methods

Root canals of mandibular premolars (n = 57) were prepared using rotary files with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as the irrigant during instrumentation. Following this, the specimens were randomly divided into three groups (n = 19) based on the final irrigant: group 1, 0.2% chitosan solution; group 2, 17% EDTA solution; group 3, saline. Three specimens from each group were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). The remaining specimens of each group were divided into two subgroups (n = 8) based on the method of agitation of the final irrigants (chitosan/EDTA/saline): subgroup A, sonic (Endoactivator, Dentsply Maillefer); subgroup B, no activation (control). After irrigation, all specimens obturated with a commercial mineral trioxide aggregate-resin hybrid sealer (MTA Fillapex, Angelus, Londrina, Brazil). Dislocation resistance was measured using the push-out bond strength test after 3 weeks. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test (P = 0.05).

Results

Immaterial of the irrigant agitation, groups irrigated with chitosan showed significantly higher bond strength values than those irrigated with EDTA (P < 0.05). Groups irrigated with saline showed the least bond strength values (P < 0.05). When EDTA was used, sonic agitation significantly improved the bond strength of the sealer, compared to the control (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between sonic agitation and the control when chitosan solution was used as the final irrigant (P > 0.05). The nitrogen/carbon ratio was significantly higher in chitosan groups compared to the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

This study provides the first evidence that chitosan irrigation improves the dislocation resistance of MTA-resin hybrid root canal sealer, compared to EDTA and saline irrigation.

Clinical relevance

Chitosan-based irrigation has been previously shown to demonstrate anti-biofilm properties in the root canal. The present study demonstrates that chitosan can improve the bond strength of a root filling material, which may contribute to better sealing of the root canal system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caron G, Nham K, Bronnec F, Machtou P (2010) Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals. J Endod 36:1361–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khedmat S, Shokouhinejad N (2008) Comparison of the efficacy of three chelating agents in smear layer removal. J Endod 34:599–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, Bakland LK (2002) Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a rewiew. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 94:658–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gu L, Kim JR, King J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2009) Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 35:791–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shahravan A, Haghdoost AA, Adl A, Rahimi H, Shadifar F (2007) Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 33:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Spanó JCE, Silva RG, Guedes DFC, Sousa-Neto MD, Estrela C, Pécora JD (2009) Atomic absorption spectrometry and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of concentration of calcium ions and smear layer removal with root canal chelators. J Endod 35:727–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuah HG, Lui JN, Tseng PS, Chen NN (2009) The effect of EDTA with and without ultrasonics on removal of the smear layer. J Endod 35:393–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Torabinejad M, Khademi A, Babagoli J (2003) A new solution for the removalof the smear layer. J Endod 29:170–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kishen A, Shrestha S, Srestha A, Chengc C (2016) Characterizing the collagen stabilizing effect of crosslinked chitason nanoparticles against collagenase degradation. Dental Mat 32:968–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peter MG (1995) Applications and environmental aspects of chitin and chitosan. J Macromol Sci A 32:629–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carpio-Perochena AD, Bramante CM, Duarte MAH, de Moura MR, Aouada FA, Kishen A (2015) Chelating and antibacterial properties of chitosan nanoparticles on dentin. Restor Dent Endod 40:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Silva P, Guedes D, Nakadi F, Pecora J, Cruz-Filho A (2013) Chitosan: a new solution for removal of smear layer after root canal instrumentation. Int Endod 46:332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bolles JA, He J, Svoboda KKH, Scheinderman E, Glickman GN (2013) Comparison of Vibringe, EndoActivator, and needle irrigation on sealer penetration in extracted human teeth. J Endod 39:708–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Torres DU, Gonzalez-Rodrıguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM (2010) Effectiveness of the EndoActivator system in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation. J Endod 36:308–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Neelakantan P, Ahmed HMA, Wong MCM, Matinlinna JP, Cheung GSP (2018) Effect of root irrigation protocols on the disclocation resistance of mineral trioxide aggregate-based materials: a systematic review of laboratory studies. Int Endod J 51:847–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oliveira DS, Cardoso ML, Queiroz TF, Silva EJ, Souza EM, De-Deus G (2016) Suboptimal push-out bond strenghts of calcium silicate-based sealers. Int Endod J 49:796–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Madhusudhana K, Satyavathi E, Lavanya A, Suneelkumar C, Deepthi M (2015) Research article comparison of the effect of chitosan and morindacitrifolia on smear layer removal: an in vitro study. Sch J Dent Sci 2:132–136

    Google Scholar 

  18. Neelakantan P, Nandagopal M, Shemesh H, Wesselink P (2015) The effect of root dentine conditioning protocols on the push-out bond strength of three calcium silicate sealers. Int J Adhes Adhes 60:104–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reddy P, Neelankantan P, Sanjee K, Matinlinna J (2018) Effect of irrigant neutralizing reducing agents on the compromised dislocation resistance of an epoxy resin and a methacrylate resin-based root canal sealer in vitro. Int J Adhes Adhes 82:206–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Silva PV, Guedes DF, Pécora JD, Cruz-Filho AM (2012) Time-dependent effects of chitosan on dentin structures. Braz Dent J 23:357–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gusiyska A, Dyulgerova E, Vassileva R, Gyulbenkiyan E (2016) The effectiveness of chitosan-citrate solution to remove the smear layer in root canal treatment-an in-vitor study. Int J Sci Res 5:1169–1174

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM (2006) Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 39:809–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ururahy MS, Curylofo-Zotti FA, Galo R, Nogueira LFB, Ramos AP, Corona SAM (2017) Wettability and surface morphology of eroded dentin treated with chitosan. Arch Oral Biol 75:68–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shrestha A, Fong SW, Khoo BC, Kishen A (2009) Delivery of antibacterial nanoparticles into dentinal trubules using high-intensity focused ultrasound. J Endod 35:1028–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gu LS, Cai X, Guo JM, Pashley DH, Breschi L, Xu HHK, Wang XY, Tay FR, Niu LN (2018) Chitosan-based extrafibrillar deminerilization for dentin bonding. J Dent Res 98:186–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518805419. [Epub ahead of print

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gu L, Mazzoni A, Gou Y, Pucci C, Breschi L, Pashley DH, Niu L, Tay FR (2018) Zymography of hybrid layers created using extrafibrillar demineralization. J Dent Res 97:409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mancini M, Cerroni L, Iorio L, Armellin E, Conte G, Cianconi L (2013) Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study. J Endod 39:1456–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Niu LN, Luo XJ, Li GH, Bortoluzzi EA, Mao J, Chen JH, Gutmann JL, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2014) Effects of different sonic activation protocols on debridement efficacy in teeth with single-rooted canals. J Dent 42:1001–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe MS, Felippe WT (2009) Biomineralization ability and interaction of mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cement with dentine in a phosphate-containing fluid. J Endod 35:731–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sarkar NK, Caicedo R, Ritwik P, Moiseyeva R, Kawashima I (2005) Physicochemical basis of the biologic properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 31:97–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Govindaraju L, Neelakantan P, Gutmann JL (2017) Effect of root canal irrigating solutions on the compressive strength of tricalcium silicate cements. Clin Oral Investig 21:567–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kesim B, Burak AK, Ustun Y, Delikan E, Gungor A (2018) Effect of chitosan on sealer penetration into the dentinal tubules. Niger J Clin Pract 21:1284–1290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prasanna Neelakantan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Esin Ozlek declares that she has no conflict of interest. Priti Pragati Rath declares that she has no conflict of interest. Anil Kishen declares that he has no conflict of interest. Prasanna Neelakantan declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The use of extracted teeth was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics committee of The University of Yuzuncu Yil.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozlek, E., Rath, P.P., Kishen, A. et al. A chitosan-based irrigant improves the dislocation resistance of a mineral trioxide aggregate-resin hybrid root canal sealer. Clin Oral Invest 24, 151–156 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02916-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02916-x

Keywords

Navigation