Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed at evaluating soft and hard tissue dimensions after immediate implant placement and immediate temporization with or without alveolar preservation at the maxillary anterior region.
Materials and methods
Twenty-two patients needing maxillary incisor extraction and with the possibility of immediate implant placement were randomly assigned to the following groups: test (n = 11): immediate implant placement + deproteinized bovine bone derived with collagen inserted into the alveolus or control (n = 11): immediate implant placement without biomaterial. All soft tissue measurements were evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after implant therapy. Cone beam tomography was performed at baseline and at 6 months after implant placement to evaluate hard tissue dimension.
Results
The test group presented higher height of soft tissue at mesiobuccal and distobuccal sites at 3 months and 6 months when compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Regarding the bone tissue, the test group showed higher buccolingual ridge dimension at 6 months when compared to the control group (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
It can be concluded that the use of deproteinized bovine bone derived with collagen together with immediate dental implants results in better soft and bone tissue outcomes than immediate implants alone.
Clinical relevance
The use of deproteinized bovine bone derived with collagen may enhance the results regarding soft and bone tissue in combination with immediate implant and temporization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Willings M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV (2008) Different loading strategies of dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials. Eur J Oral Implantol 1:259–276
Javed F, Romanos GE (2010) The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. J Dent 38:612–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.013
Phillips K, Kois JC (1998) Aesthetic peri-implant site development. The restorative connection. Dent Clin N Am 42:57–70
Barone A, Toti P, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Derchi G, Covani U (2014) Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 85:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2013.120711
Stoupel J, Lee CT, Glick J, Sanz-Miralles E, Chiuzan C, Papapanou PN (2016) Immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the aesthetic zone using a flapless or a flap-involving approach: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol 43:1171–1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12610
Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L (2015) Soft tissue contour changes at immediate postextraction single-tooth implants with immediate restoration: a 12-month prospective cohort study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 35:191–198. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2326
Cosyn J, Eghbali A, Hermans A, Vervaeke S, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R (2016) A 5-year prospective study on single immediate implants in the aesthetic zone. J Clin Periodontol 43:702–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12571
Araújo MG, da Silva JCC, de Mendonça AF, Lindhe J (2015) Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:407–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12366
Roccuzzo M, Gaudioso L, Bunino M, Dalmasso P (2014) Long-term stability of soft tissues following alveolar ridge preservation: 10-year results of a prospective study around non submerged implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 34:795–804. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2133
Alkan EA, Parlar A, Yildirim B, Senguven B (2013) Histological comparison of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using enamel matrix derivatives versus Bio-Oss Collagen: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:1522–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.06.002
Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Huerzeler M (2008) Tissue alterations after tooth extraction with and without surgical trauma: a volumetric study in the beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol 35:356–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01209.x
Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, Lindhe J (2005) Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:645–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x
Araújo MG, Lindhe J (2005) Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:212–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x
Brägger U, Pasquali L, Kornman KS (1988) Remodelling of interdental alveolar bone after periodontal flap procedures assessed by means of computer-assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA). J Clin Periodontol 15:558–564
Wood DL, Hoag PM, Donnenfeld OW, Rosenfeld LD (1972) Alveolar crest reduction following full and partial thickness flaps. J Periodontol 43:141–144
Tavtigian R (1970) The height of the facial radicular alveolar crest following apically positioned flap operations. J Periodontol 41:412–418
De Rouck T, Collys K, Wyn I, Cosyn J (2009) Instant provisionalization of immediate single-tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:566–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01674.x
Pontes AE, Ribeiro FS, da Silva VC, Margonar R, Piattelli A, Cirelli JA, Marcantonio E Jr (2008) Clinical and radiographic changes around dental implants inserted in different levels in relation to the crestal bone, under different restoration protocols, in the dog model. J Periodontol 79:486–494. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070145
Park JB (2010) Healing of extraction socket grafted with deproteinized bovine bone and acellular dermal matrix: histomorphometric evaluation. Implant Dent 19:307–313. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181e5abbc
Araújo MG, Lindhe J (2009) Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss Collagen: a 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:433–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01705.x
Seibert JS (1993) Treatment of moderate localized alveolar ridge defects. Preventive and reconstructive concepts in therapy. Dent Clin N Am 37:265–280
Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J (2004) Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 31:820–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x
Chen ST, Buser D (2014) Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla—a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29:186–215. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3
Wilson TG, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran D (1998) Implants placed in immediate extraction sites: a report of histologic and histometric analyses of human biopsies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13:333–341
Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, Lindhe J (2006) Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 17:615–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01317.x
Akimoto K, Becker W, Persson R, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O’Neal RB (1999) Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: a study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:351–360
Carlsson L, Röstlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T (1988) Implant fixation improved by close fit cylindrical implant—bone interface studied in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 59:272–275
Caudill RF, Meffert RM (1991) Histologic analysis of the osseointegration of endosseous implants in simulated extraction sockets with and without e-PTFE barriers. 1. Preliminary findings. Int J Periodontics Restorative, vol 11. Dent, pp 207–215
Hasturk H, Kantarci A, Ghattas M, Dangaria SJ, Abdallah R, Morgan EF, Diekwisch TG, Ashman A, Van Dyke T (2014) The use of light/chemically hardened polymethylmethacrylate, polyhydroxylethylmethacrylate, and calcium hydroxide graft material in combination with polyanhydride around implants and extraction sockets in minipigs: part II: histologic and micro-CT evaluations. J Periodontol 85:1230–1239. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.120424
Assaf JH, Zanatta FB, de Brito RB Jr, França FM (2013) Computed tomographic evaluation of alterations of the buccolingual width of the alveolar ridge after immediate implant placement associated with the use of a synthetic bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:757–763. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2719
Caneva M, Botticelli D, Morelli F, Cesaretti G, Beolchini M, Lang NP (2012) Alveolar process preservation at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine bone mineral—an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:789–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02332.x
Araújo MG, Linder E, Lindhe J (2011) Bio-Oss collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: a 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 22:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01920.x
Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC (2007) A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin Oral Implants Res 18:552–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01388.x
Sanz M, Lindhe J, Alcaraz J, Sanz-Sanchez I, Cecchinato D (2017) The effect of placing a bone replacement graft in the gap at immediately placed implants: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 28:902–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12896
Cardaropoli D, Gaveglio L, Gherlone E, Cardaropoli G (2014) Soft tissue contour changes at immediate implants: a randomized controlled clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 34:631–637. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1845
Clementini M, Tiravia L, De Risi V, Vittorini Orgeas G, Mannocci A, de Sanctis M (2015) Dimensional changes after immediate implant placement with or without simultaneous regenerative procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 42:666–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12423
Araújo M, Linder E, Wennström J, Lindhe J (2008) The influence of bio-Oss collagen on healing of an extraction socket: an experimental study in the dog. Int J periodontics restorative, vol 28. Dent, pp 123–135
Tsoukaki M, Kalpidis CD, Sakellari D, Tsalikis L, Mikrogiorgis G, Konstantinidis A (2013) Clinical, radiographic, microbiological, and immunological outcomes of flapped vs. flapless dental implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 24:969–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02503.x
Lee CT, Chiu TS, Chuang SK, Tarnow D, Stoupel J (2014) Alterations of the bone dimension following immediate implant placement into extraction socket: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 41:914–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12276
Delgado-Ruiz R, Romanos GE, Alexandre Gerhke S, Gomez-Moreno G, Maté-Sánchez de Val JE, Calvo-Guirado JL (2016) Biological effects of compressive forces exerted on particulate bone grafts during socket preservation: animal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 29:792–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12942
Romanos GE, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Gómez-Moreno G, López-López PJ, Mate Sanchez de Val JE, Calvo-Guirado JL (2018) Role of mechanical compression on bone regeneration around a particulate bone graft material: an experimental study in rabbit calvaria. Clin Oral Implants Res 29(6):612-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12592
van Steenberghe D, Callens A, Geers L, Jacobs R (2000) The clinical use of deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration in conjunction with immediate implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 11:210–216
Cosyn J, Hooghe N, De Bruyn H (2012) A systematic review on the frequency of advanced recession following single immediate implant treatment. J Clin Periodontol 39:582–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01888.x
Knox R, Caudill R, Meffert R (1991) Histologic evaluation of dental endosseous implants placed in surgically created extraction defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 11:364–375
Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D (2006) State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig 10:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0031-2
Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S, Terakado M (2003) A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95:371–437. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.120
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the local ethical committee of Paulista University (56342516.8.0000.5512).
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Girlanda, F.F., Feng, H.S., Corrêa, M.G. et al. Deproteinized bovine bone derived with collagen improves soft and bone tissue outcomes in flapless immediate implant approach and immediate provisionalization: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 23, 3885–3893 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02819-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02819-x