Influence of attachment design and material on the retention of resin-bonded attachments
- 138 Downloads
The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the influence of the attachment design and material on the retention of resin-bonded attachments (RBAs) before and after dynamic loading.
Materials and methods
Forty-eight caries-free human premolars were prepared for RBAs fabricated either from a CoCr alloy or from zirconia ceramic. Specimens were divided into three groups (n = 16 each). Two groups had a standard attachment design for alloys (group M made from a CoCr alloy and group Z1 made from zirconia ceramic). The third group had an attachment design optimized for zirconia ceramic (group Z2 made from zirconia ceramic). Attachments were bonded to the acid-etched enamel of the premolars using a phosphate monomer containing adhesive resin. Subgroups of eight specimens each were either debonded using a tensile force in a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 2 mm/min (S) or were exposed to dynamic loading with 50 N over 1200,000 loading cycles in a chewing simulator prior to debonding (D).
There were no significant differences in the initial failure loads of groups. With the exception of subgroup Z1-D, all specimens survived the dynamic loading. Statistical analysis showed that dynamic loading caused a significant decrease of failure loads in group Z1. In contrast, subgroup Z2-D exhibited significantly higher failure loads compared to the subgroup Z1-D.
The results suggest that zirconia RBAs fabricated with an optimized attachment design may be a valid clinical alternative to metal RBAs.
Clinical data on the long-term potential of zirconia RBAs is required before these restorations can be recommended for general use.
KeywordsResin-bonded attachments RBAs, all-ceramic Fracture load Fatigue load Dye penetration Zirconia
The authors acknowledge the support of this study by Bredent, Senden, Germany, by providing their material free of charge, as well as by Neue Zähne, Osnabrück, Germany, by manufacturing the zirconia restorations free of charge.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 1.Marinello CP, Schärer P (1987) Resin-bonded etched cast extracoronal attachments for removable partial dentures: clinical experiences. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 7(2):36–49Google Scholar
- 2.Kern M (1991) Care of young female patient using adhesive attachments and removable partial denture. Quintessenz 42(4):577–590Google Scholar
- 3.Kern M (2005) Single retainer resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses and resin-bonded attachments—proven innovation. Zahnärztl Mitt 95(21):2878–2884Google Scholar
- 4.Kern M, Simons K (1999) Resin-bonded attachments for removable partial dentures. Zahnärztl Mitt 89(10):1232–1237Google Scholar
- 5.Kleimeier B, Kern M (1992) Resin-bonded attachments—use in severe periodontitis. Parodontol 3(4):259–270Google Scholar
- 6.Kern M (1998) Resin-bonded attachments for removable partial dentures—a 7-year follow up of young female patient. Quintessenz 49(1):7–12Google Scholar
- 9.Peters S (1986) Comparison of tooth structure removal for adhesive and crown preparation. Quintessenz 37(12):2039–2044Google Scholar
- 11.Larson TD (2008) Atraumatic tooth preparation. Northwest Dent 87(1):29–34Google Scholar
- 13.Schmitt J, Wichmann M, Eitner S, Hamel J, Holst S (2011) Five-year clinical follow-up of prefabricated precision attachments: a comparison of uni- and bilateral removable dental prostheses. Quintessence Int 42(5):413–418Google Scholar
- 14.Kern M, Knode H, Strub JR (1991) The all-porcelain, resin-bonded bridge. Quintessence Int 22(4):257–262Google Scholar
- 21.Kern M (2017) RBFDPs: resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses, 1st edn. Quintessence, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 26.Koutayas SO, Kern M, Ferraresso F, Strub JR (2002) Influence of framework design on the fracture strength of mandibular anterior all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 15(3):223–229Google Scholar