Effectiveness for dentin hypersensitivity treatment of non-carious cervical lesions: a meta-analysis
- 1k Downloads
The aim of this review is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of in-home or in-office treatments for dentin hypersensitivity.
Materials and methods
An electronic search without restriction on dates or languages was performed in four electronic databases until March 2017. In addition, hand-searches in regular journals and in the gray literature were also conducted. To develop the search strategy, clinical questions were formulated using the PICOS method. Eligibility criteria included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared the effectiveness of different agents for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity through chemical occlusion, physical occlusion, nerve desensitization, or photobiomodulation (low-level light therapy). This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42016039394.
Twenty-five RCTs (16 parallel; 9 split-mouth), published from 1992 to 2016, were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that in-office subgroups treated with chemical or physical occlusion of dentin tubules and nerve desensitization had a statistically significant difference from placebo, with P < 0.00001, P < 0.00001, and P = 0.02, respectively. For in-home treatments, the results of the meta-analysis showed that only those subgroups treated with chemical occlusion of dentin tubules and nerve desensitization exhibited a statistically significant difference from placebo, with P < 0.00001 and P = 0.03, respectively.
The results of pairwise meta-analysis suggest that among in-office treatments, dentinal tubule occlusion (whether chemical or physical) and nerve desensitization provide the best outcomes for treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. For in-home treatments, only chemical occlusion of dentin tubules and nerve desensitization showed a greater treatment efficacy than placebo and the difference was statistically significant.
KeywordsEvidence-based dentistry Dentin hypersensitivity Dentin desensitizing agent Meta-analysis
The authors would like to thank Dr. Anely Oliveira Lopes, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Brazil, for providing some missing information about this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 2.Addy M (1992) Clinical aspects of dentine hypersensitivity. Proc Finn Dent Soc 88(suppl. 1):407–412Google Scholar
- 3.Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT, Meyerowitz C, Litaker MS, Heft MW, Tasgaonkar N, Day MR, Porter-Williams A, Gordan VV, Yardic RL, Lawhorn TM, Gilbert GH, National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group (2017) Management of dentin hypersensitivity by practitioners in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc 148:728–736CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Vano M, Derchi G, Barone A, Pinna R, Usai P, Covani U (2017) Reducing dentine hypersensitivity with nano-hydroxyapatite toothpaste: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2113-3
- 14.Orsini G, Procaccini M, Manzoli L, Giuliodori F, Lorenzini A, Putignano A (2010) A double-blind randomized-controlled trial comparing the desensitizing efficacy of a new dentifrice containing carbonate/hydroxyapatite nanocrystals and a sodium fluoride/potassium nitrate dentifrice. J Clin Periodontol 37(6):510–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01558.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Higgins JPT, Green S, eds (2006) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]. In: The Cochrane Library 4Google Scholar
- 20.Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P (2007) Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 15:7–16Google Scholar
- 23.Prabhakar AR, Manojkumar AJ, Basappa N (2013) In vitro remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions and assessment of dentine tubule occlusion from NaF dentifrices with and without calcium. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 31(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.112403 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Nagata T, Ishida H, Shinohara H, Nishikawa S, Kasahara S, Wakano Y, Daigen S, Troullos ES (1994) Clinical evaluation of a potassium nitrate dentifrice for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 21(3):217–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1994.tb00307.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Cunha-Cruz J, Wataha JC, Heaton LJ, Rothen M, Sobieraj M, Scott J, Berg J, Northwest Practice-based Research Collaborative in Evidence-based DENTistry (2013) The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in general dental practices in the northwest United States. J Am Dent Assoc 144(3):288–296. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0116 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 36.Pesevska S, Nakova M, Ivanovski K, Angelov N, Kesic L, Obradovic R, Mindova S, Nares S (2010) Dentinal hypersensitivity following scaling and root planing: comparison of low-level laser and topical fluoride treatment. Lasers Med Sci 25(5):647–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0685-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Veitz-Keenan A, Barna JA, Strober B, Matthews AG, Collie D, Vena D et al (2013) Treatments for hypersensitive noncarious cervical lesions: a Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network randomized clinical effectiveness study. J Dent Am Assoc 144:495–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Gillam DG, Newman HN, Davies EH, Bulman JS (1992) Clinical efficacy of a low abrasive dentifrice for the relief of cervical dentinal hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 19(3):197–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1992.tb00639.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Gillam DG, Bulman JS, Jackson RJ, Newman HN (1996) Efficacy of a potassium nitrate mouthwash in alleviating cervical dentine sensitivity (CDS). J Clin Periodontol 23(11):993–997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00526.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 50.Assis JS, Rodrigues LK, Fonteles CS, Colares RC, Souza AM, Santiago SL (2011) Dentin hypersensitivity after treatment with desensitizing agents: a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial. Braz Dent J 22(2):157–161. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402011000200012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 51.Yilmaz HG, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Cengiz E (2011) Long-term effect of diode laser irradiation compared to sodium fluoride varnish in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity in periodontal maintenance patients: a randomized controlled clinical study. Photomed Laser Surg 29:721–725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 57.Neuhaus KW, Milleman JL, Milleman KR, Mongiello KA, Simonton TC, Clark CE, Proskin HM, Seemann R (2013) Effectiveness of a calcium sodium phosphosilicate-containing prophylaxis paste in reducing dentine hypersensitivity immediately and 4 weeks after a single application: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol 40(4):349–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12057 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 59.Elias Boneta AR, Ramirez K, Naboa J, Mateo LR, Stewart B, Panagokos F, de Vizio W (2013) Efficacy in reducing dentine hypersensitivity of a regimen using a toothpaste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate, a mouthwash containing 0.8% arginine, pyrophosphate and PVM/MA copolymer and a toothbrush compared to potassium and negative control regimens: an eight-week randomized clinical trial. J Dent 41(Suppl. 1):S42–S49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 63.Wang L, Magalhães AC, Francisconi-Dos-Rios LF, Calabria MP, Araújo D, Buzalaf M, Lauris J, Pereira JC (2016) Treatment of dentin hypersensitivity using nano-hydroxyapatite pastes: a randomized three-month clinical trial. Oper Dent 41(4):E93–E101. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-145-C CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar