Skip to main content
Log in

Cyclic fatigue and torsional strength of three different thermally treated reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 26 December 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cyclic and torsional fatigue resistance of the reciprocating single-file systems Reciproc Blue 25.08 (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany), Prodesign R 25.06 (Easy Dental Equipment, Belo Horizonte, Brazil), and WaveOne Gold 25.07 (Dentsply/Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK, USA).

Materials and methods

Sixty reciprocating instruments of the systems Reciproc Blue R25 (RB #25 .08 taper), Prodesign R (PDR #25 .06 taper), and WaveOne Gold (WOG #25 .07 taper) (n = 20) were used. Cyclic fatigue resistance testing was performed by measuring the time to failure in an artificial stainless steel canal with a 60° angle of curvature and a 5-mm radius located 5 mm from the tip (n = 10). The torsional test (ISO 3630-1) evaluated the torque and angle of rotation at failure of new instruments (n = 10) in the portion 3 mm from the tip. The fractured surface of each fragment was also observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition, a supplementary examination was performed to measure the cross-sectional area of each instrument 3 and 5 mm from the tip. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test, and the level of significance was set at 5%.

Results

The cyclic fatigue resistance values of PDR 25.06 were significantly higher (P < 0.05). RB 25.08 showed higher fatigue resistance than WOG 25.07 (P < 0.05). The torsional test showed that PDR 25.06 had lower torsional strength (P < 0.05). No differences were observed between RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07 (P > 0.05). PDR 25.06 showed higher angular rotation values than RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07 (P < 0.05). RB 25.08 presented higher angular rotation than WOG 25.07 (P < 0.05). The cross-sectional area analysis showed that PDR 25.06 presented the smallest cross-sectional areas at 3 and 5 mm from the tip (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

PDR 25.06 presented the highest cyclic fatigue resistance and angular rotation until fracture compared to RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07. In addition, RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07 had higher torsional strength than PDR 25.06.

Clinical relevance

In endodontic practice, thermally treated reciprocating instruments have been used for the root canal preparation of curved and constricted canals; therefore, these instruments should present high flexibility and suitable torsional strength to minimize the risk of instrument fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 26 December 2017

    The original version of this article contained a mistake. The name Jader Carvalho Pinto should have been Jader Camilo Pinto.

References

  1. Gao Y, Gutmann JL, Wilkinson K, Maxwell R, Ammon D (2012) Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J Endod 38(3):398–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shen Y, Zhou HM, Zheng YF et al (2013) Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 39(2):163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De-Deus G, Moreira EJL, Lopes HP, Elias CN (2010) Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod 43(12):1063–1068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01756.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karataş E, Arslan H, Büker M, Seçkin F, Çapar ID (2016) Effect of movement kinematics on the cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium instruments. Int Endod J 49(4):361–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Vieira VT et al (2017) Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the Reciproc files. J Endod 43(3):462–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS et al (2012) Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 38(4):541–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Varela-Patiño P, Ibañez-Párraga A, Rivas-Mundiña B, Cantatore G, Otero XL, Martin-Biedma B (2010) Alternating versus continuous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 36(1):157–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JEA et al (2000) Defects in rotary nickel–titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 26(3):161–165. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pedullà E, Lo Savio F, Boninelli S, Plotino G, Grande NM, la Rosa G, Rapisarda E (2016) Torsional and cyclic fatigue resistance of a new nickel-titanium instrument manufactured by electrical discharge machining. J Endod 42(1):156–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.004

  10. Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE (2015) Torsion and bending properties of OneShape and WaveOne instruments. J Endod 41(4):544–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W et al (2012) Mechanical properties of controlled memory and superelastic nickel-titanium wires used in the manufacture of rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod 38(11):1535–1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peters OA, Gluskin AK, Weiss RA, Han JT (2012) An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of novel Hyflex nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J 45(11):1027–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02067.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Özyürek T (2016) Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc, WaveOne, and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 42(10):536–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Topçuoğlu HS, Düzgün S, Aktı A, Topçuoğlu G (2017) Laboratory comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and WaveOne files in canals with a double curvature. Int Endod J 50(7):713–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hieawy A, Haapasalo M, Zhou H, Wang Z, Shen Y (2015) Phase transformation behavior and resistance to bending and cyclic fatigue of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal instruments. J Endod 41(7):1134–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Webber J (2015) Shaping canals with confidence: WaveOne GOLD single-file reciprocating system. Roots 11(1):34–40

  17. Plotino G, Grande NM, Mercadé Bellido M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G (2017) Influence of temperature on cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal rotary files. J Endod 43(2):200–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM, Badr AE (2016) Torsional and bending resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and Twisted File Adaptive instruments. Int Endod J 50(11):1077–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Plotino G, Grande NM, Cotti E, Testarelli L, Gambarini G (2014) Blue treatment enhances cyclic fatigue resistance of vortex nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 40(9):1451–1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shen Y, Zhou H, Coil JM, Aljazaeri B, Buttar R, Wang Z, Zheng Y, Haapasalo M (2015) ProFile vortex and vortex blue nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use. J Endod 41(6):937–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Silva EJ, Rodrigues C, Vieira VT et al (2016) Bending resistance and cyclic fatigue of a new heat-treated reciprocating instrument. Scanning 38(6):837–841. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alcalde MP, Tanomaru-Filho M, Bramante CM, Duarte MAH, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Camilo-Pinto J, Só MVR, Vivan RR (2017) Cyclic and torsional fatigue resistance of reciprocating single files manufactured by different nickel-titanium alloys. J Endod 43(7):1186–1191. https://doi.org/10.2016/j.joen.2017.03.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pedullà E, Lo Savio F, Boninelli S, Plotino G, Grande NM, la Rosa G, Rapisarda E (2016) Torsional and cyclic fatigue resistance of a new nickel-titanium instrument manufactured by electrical discharge machining. J Endod 42(1):156–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.004

  24. Bahia MG, Melo MC, Buono VT (2006) Influence of simulated clinical use on the torsional behavior of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101(5):675–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.04.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang EW, Cheung GS, Zheng YF (2011) A mathematical model for describing the mechanical behaviour of root canal instruments. Int Endod 44(1):72–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01801.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaval ME, Capar ID, Ertas H (2016) Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary files with various alloy properties. J Endod 42(12):1840–1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Plotino G, Grande NM, Cordaro M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G (2009) A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 35(11):1469–1476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Capar ID, Kaval ME, Ertas H et al (2015) Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 different rotary pathfinding instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire and controlled memory wire. J Endod 41(4):535–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.008

  29. Lopes HP, Gambarra-Soares T, Elias CN, Siqueira JF Jr, Inojosa IFJ, Lopes WSP, Vieira VTL (2013) Comparison of the mechanical properties of rotary instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire, or nickel-titanium alloy in R-phase. J Endod 39(4):516–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Arslan H, Alsancak M, Doğanay E, Karataş E, Davut Çapar İ, Ertas H (2016) Cyclic fatigue analysis of Reciproc R25® instruments with different kinematics. Aust Endod J 42(1):22–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pedulla E, Grande NM, Plotino G et al (2013) Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 39(2):258–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim JW, Ha JH, Cheung GS et al (2014) Safety of the factory preset rotation angle of reciprocating instruments. J Endod 40(10):1671–1675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gündoğar M, Özyürek T (2017) Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc blue nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 43(7):1192–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. e Vasconcelos RA, Murphy S, Carvalho CA et al (2016) Evidence for reduced fatigue resistance of contemporary rotary instruments exposed to body temperature. J Endod 42(5):782–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pereira ESJ, Amaral CCF, Gomes JACP, Peters OA, Buono VTL, Bahia MGA (2017) Influence of clinical use on physical-structural surface properties and electrochemical potential of NiTi endodontic instruments. Int Endod J. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12768

  36. Baek SH, Lee CJ, Versluis A, Kim BM, Lee WC, Kim HC (2011) Comparison of torsional stiffness of nickel-titanium rotary files with different geometric characteristics. J Endod 37(9):1283–1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the State of São Paulo Research Foundation FAPESP (2014/25520-0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Ricci Vivan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: the name Jader Carvalho Pinto should have been Jader Camilo Pinto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alcalde, M.P., Duarte, M.A.H., Bramante, C.M. et al. Cyclic fatigue and torsional strength of three different thermally treated reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments. Clin Oral Invest 22, 1865–1871 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2295-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2295-8

Keywords

Navigation