Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 1531–1539 | Cite as

Cone beam computed tomography and ultrasonography imaging of benign intraosseous jaw lesion: a prospective radiopathological study

  • Ibrahim Sevki Bayrakdar
  • Ahmet Berhan Yilmaz
  • Fatma Caglayan
  • Umit Ertas
  • Cemal Gundogdu
  • Ismail Gumussoy
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

We assessed whether ultrasonography (US) can be used in combination with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to image intraosseous jaw lesions.

Material and methods

Using CBCT and US, we evaluated 123 lytic intraosseous jaw lesions diagnosed in 121 patients with guidance from the CBCT findings. The lesions were classified into two groups based on histopathological evaluation: (1) cysts and (2) tumors and tumor-like lesions. US and histopathological findings on the lesions of the two groups and their relationships with each other were also assessed. Results are reported as means ± standard errors, and p < 0.001 was accepted as indicating statistical significance.

Result

In total, 123 lesions were evaluated; 74 (60.2%) were cysts and 49 (39.8%) were tumors or tumor-like lesions. The CBCT and US findings were compatible as far as dimensional measurements of the lesions in the three planes (p < 0.001). The US and histopathological findings on the content of the lesions correlated (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

CBCT provides useful information for diagnosing intraosseous jaw lesions. Because it offers no valid Hounsfield unit (HU) value, it does not differentiate between solid and cystic masses. Thus, US can be used with CBCT to image intraosseous jaw lesions caused by buccal cortical thinning or perforation.

Clinical relevance

US provides useful information about intraosseous jaw lesions and can be used with CBCT to image such lesions caused by buccal cortical thinning or perforation. Clinicians can take this information into consideration when evaluating intraosseous jaw pathology.

Keywords

Cone beam computed tomography Intraosseous jaw lesion Ultrasonography 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Lauria L, Curi MM, Chammas MC, Pinto DS, Torloni H (1996) Ultrasonography evaluation of bone lesions of the jaw. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 82:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sumer AP, Danaci M, Ozen Sandikci E, Sumer M, Celenk P (2009) Ultrasonography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of intraosseous lesions of the jaws. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 38:23–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boeddinghaus R, Whyte A (2008) Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging. Eur J Radiol 66:396–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shumway BS, Foster TS (2011) Pathology of the jaw: the importance of radiographs. J Can Dent Assoc 77:b132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baum U, Greess H, Lell M, Nomayr A, Lenz M (2000) Imaging of head and neck tumors—methods: CT, spiral-CT, multislice-spiral-CT. Eur J Radiol 33:153–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR (2009) Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:609–625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahmad M, Freymiller E (2010) Cone beam computed tomography: evaluation of maxillofacial pathology. J Calif Dent Assoc 38:41–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scarfe WC, Farman AG (2008) What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin N Am 52:707–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gumussoy I, Miloglu O, Bayrakdar IS, Dagistan S, Caglayan F (2014) Ultrasonography in the evaluation of the mid-palatal suture in rapid palatal expansion. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 43:20140167CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wakasugi-Sato N, Kodama M, Matsuo K, Yamamoto N, Oda M, Ishikawa A et al (2010) Advanced clinical usefulness of ultrasonography for diseases in oral and maxillofacial regions. Int J Dent 2010:639382CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shahidi S, Shakibafard A, Zamiri B, Mokhtare MR, Houshyar M, Mahdian S (2015) The feasibility of ultrasonography in defining the size of jaw osseous lesions. J Dent (Shiraz) 16:335–340Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cotti E, Campisi G, Garau V, Puddu G (2002) A new technique for the study of periapical bone lesions: ultrasound real time imaging. Int Endod J 35:148–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cotti E, Campisi G, Ambu R, Dettori C (2003) Ultrasound real-time imaging in the differential diagnosis of periapical lesions. Int Endod J 36:556–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gundappa M, Ng SY, Whaites EJ (2006) Comparison of ultrasound, digital and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 35:326–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Araki M, Kameoka S, Matsumoto N, Komiyama K (2007) Usefulness of cone beam computed tomography for odontogenic myxoma. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 36:423–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenberg PA, Frisbie J, Lee J, Lee K, Frommer H, Kottal S et al (2010) Evaluation of pathologists (histopathology) and radiologists (cone beam computed tomography) differentiating radicular cysts from granulomas. J Endod. 36:423–428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guo J, Simon JH, Sedghizadeh P, Soliman ON, Chapman T, Enciso R (2013) Evaluation of the reliability and accuracy of using cone-beam computed tomography for diagnosing periapical cysts from granulomas. J Endod 39:1485–1490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schon R, Duker J, Schmelzeisen R (2002) Ultrasonographic imaging of head and neck pathology. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 10:213–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pallagatti S, Sheikh S, Puri N, Mittal A, Singh B (2012) To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonography compared to clinical diagnosis, radiography and histopathological findings in the diagnosis of maxillofacial swellings. Eur J Radiol 81:1821–1827CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gritzmann N, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Rettenbacher T (2002) Sonography of soft tissue masses of the neck. J Clin Ultrasound 30:356–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    el-Silimy O, Corney C. The value of sonography in the management of cystic neck lesions. J Laryngol Otol 1993;107:245–251Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chandak R, Degwekar S, Bhowte RR, Motwani M, Banode P, Chandak M et al (2011) An evaluation of efficacy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of head and neck swellings. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 40:213–221CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alam T, Khattak YJ, Beg M, Raouf A, Azeemuddin M, Khan AA (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules using fine needle aspiration cytology as the reference standard. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15:10039–10043CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ishii J, Nagasawa H, Wadamori T, Yamashiro M, Ishikawa H, Yamada T et al (1999) Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of palatal tumors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 87:39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Darshan DD, Katti G, Raviraj GA, Manikantan NS, Kumar AD, Balakrishnan D (2013) Sound waves for unsound entities: an electronic search study to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography in cysts and tumors of maxillofacial region. J Contemp Dent Pract 14:586–589CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ishikawa H, Ishii Y, Ono T, Makimoto K, Yamamoto K, Torizuka K (1983) Evaluation of gray-scale ultrasonography in the investigation of oral and neck mass lesions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:775–781CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shimizu M, Ussmuller J, Hartwein J, Donath K, Kinukawa N (1999) Statistical study for sonographic differential diagnosis of tumorous lesions in the parotid gland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 88:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Blessmann M, Pohlenz P, Blake FA, Lenard M, Schmelzle R, Heiland M (2007) Validation of a new training tool for ultrasound as a diagnostic modality in suspected midfacial fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:501–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nezafati S, Javadrashid R, Rad S, Akrami S (2010) Comparison of ultrasonography with submentovertex films and computed tomography scan in the diagnosis of zygomatic arch fractures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 39:11–16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kurabayashi T, Ida M, Yoshino N, Sasaki T, Ishii J, Ueda M (1997) Differential diagnosis of tumours of the minor salivary glands of the palate by computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 26:16–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ferreira TL, Costa AL, Tucunduva MJ, Tucunduva-Neto RR, Shinohara EH, de Freitas CF. Ultrasound evaluation of intra-osseous cavity: a preliminary study in pig mandibles. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2016 Nov;6 (Suppl 1):S14–S17. Epub 2016 Oct 15
  32. 32.
    Musu D, Rossi-Fedele G, Campisi G, Cotti E (2016 Jul) Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of bone lesions of the jaws: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 122(1):e19–e29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.03.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of DentistryEskisehir Osmangazi UniversityEskişehirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of DentistryAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of DentistryAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  4. 4.Medical PathologyErzurumTurkey
  5. 5.Turkish Health Ministry Gungoren Oral Health HospitalIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations