Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 1113–1122 | Cite as

Bond durability of universal adhesive to bovine enamel using self-etch mode

  • Soshi Suzuki
  • Toshiki Takamizawa
  • Arisa Imai
  • Akimasa Tsujimoto
  • Keiichi Sai
  • Masayuki Takimoto
  • Wayne W. Barkmeier
  • Mark A. Latta
  • Masashi Miyazaki
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to examine the enamel bond durability of universal adhesives in the self-etch mode under 2-year water storage and thermal cycling conditions.

Materials and methods

Three commercially available universal adhesives and a gold standard two-step self-etch adhesive were used. Ten specimens of bovine enamel were prepared per test group, and shear bond strength (SBS) was measured to determine the bonding durability after thermal cycling (TC) or long-term water storage (WS). The bonded specimens were divided into three groups: (1) specimens subjected to TC, where the bonded specimens were stored in 37 °C distilled water for 24 h before being subjected to 3000, 10,000, 20,000 or 30,000 TC; (2) specimens stored in 37 °C distilled water for 3 months, 6 months, 1 year or 2 year; and (3) specimens stored in 37 °C distilled water for 24 h, serving as a baseline.

Results

The two-step self-etch adhesive showed significantly higher SBS than the universal adhesives tested, regardless of the type of degradation method. All universal adhesives showed no significant enamel SBS reductions in TC and WS, when compared to baseline and the other degradation conditions.

Conclusions

Compared to the bond strengths obtained with the two-step self-etch adhesive, significantly lower bond strengths were obtained with universal adhesives. However, the enamel bond durability of universal adhesives was relatively stable under both degradation conditions tested.

Clinical relevance

The present data indicate that the enamel bond durability of universal adhesives in the self-etch mode might be sufficient for clinical use.

Keywords

Universal adhesive Bonding durability Thermal cycling Two-year water storage 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, 16K11565, 17K11716 and 17K17141, from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. This project was also supported in part by the Sato Fund and by a grant from the Dental Research Center of the Nihon University School of Dentistry, Japan.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study does not contain any studies with human participants and subjects or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Ferracane JL (2011) Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater 27:29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ruggeberg FA (2011) State of the art: dental photocuring—a review. Dent Mater 27:39–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ (2000) Minimal intervention dentistry—a review. FDI Commission Project 1–97. Int Dent J 50:501–512.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00540.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Carencro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano DE (2008) Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 24:90–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carvalho RM, Manse AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2012) Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater 28:72–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tezvergil-Mutluy A, Pashley DH, Mutluray MM (2015) Long-term durability of dental adhesives. Curr Oral Health Rep 2:174–181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-015-0070-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Scheidel DD, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2015) Effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching on fatigue limits of self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent 40:379–395. doi:  https://doi.org/10.2341/13–252-L
  8. 8.
    Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Scheidel DD, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2015) Influence of water storage on fatigue strength of self-etch adhesives. J Dent 43:1416–1427.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.10.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84:118–132.  https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, Van Meerbeek B (2014) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restorations of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. Dent Mater 30:1089–1103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amaral FLB, Colucci V, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SAM (2007) Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: a critical review. J Esthet Restor Dent 19:340–354.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00134.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sai K, Shimamura Y, Takamizawa T, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Endo H, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of degradation conditions on dentin bonding durability of three universal adhesives. J Dent 54:56–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.09.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deng D, Yang H, Guo J, Chen X, Zhang W, Huang C (2014) Effects of different artificial ageing methods on the degradation of adhesive-dentine interfaces. J Dent 42:1577–1585.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frassetto A, Breschi L, Turco G, Marchesi G, Di Lenarda R, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Cadenaro M (2016) Mechanisms of degradation of the hybrid layer in adhesive dentistry and therapeutic agents to improve bond durability—a literature review. Dent Mater 32:e41–e53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miyazaki M, Sato M, Onose H (1998) Influence of thermal cycling on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent 11:118–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    da Rosa WL, Piva E, da Silva AF (2015) Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 43:765–776.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seabra B, Arantes-Oliveira S, Portugal J (2014) Influence of multimode universal adhesives and zirconia primer application techniques on zirconia repair. J Prosthet Dent 112:182–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater 32:e9–e21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Endo H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems. Oper Dent 41:520–530.  https://doi.org/10.2341/15-347-L CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siqueria F, Cardenas AM, Gutierrez MF, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigão J (2016) Laboratory performance of universal adhesive systems for luting CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Adhes Dent 18:331–340.  https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a36519 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Wilwerding T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2017) Influence of surface free energy characteristics on universal adhesives on boding to various substrates. Oper Dent 42:e59–e70.  https://doi.org/10.2341/15–353-L. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    ISO 29022: 2013 Dentistry-Adhesion-Notched-edge shear bond strength test. 1stedn. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization. ISO (2013) 1–12.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gale MS, Darvell BW (1999) Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 27:89–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Flower CS, Swartz ML, Moore BK, Rhodes BF (1992) Influence of selected variables on adhesion testing. Dent Mater 8:265–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schilke R, Bauss O, Lisson JA, Schuckar M, Geurtsen W (1999) Bovine dentin as a substitute for human dentin in shear bond strength measurements. Am J Dent 12:92–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomater 28:3757–3785.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials2007.04.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL (2011) State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 27:17–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C, Hashimoto M, Breschi L, Carvalho RM, Ito S (2004) Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res 83:216–221.  https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300306 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    De Munck J, Van den Steen PE, Mine A, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Opdebakker G, Van Meerbeek B (2009) Inhibition of enzymatic degradation of adhesive-dentin interfaces. J Dent Res 88:1101–1106.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509346952 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Garcia-Godoy F, Krӓmer N, Feilzer AJ, Frankenberger R (2010) Long-term degradation of enamel and dentin bonds: 6-year results in vitro vs. in vivo. Dent Mater 26:1113–1118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.07.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Powers JM, Wataha JC (2013) Dental materials: properties and manipulation chapter 2 properties of materials 14–25, 10th ed. Missouri:Mosby, Elsevier Inc., USA.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Tagami J (2000) The influence of storage solution on dentin bond durability of resin cement. Dent Mater 16:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00061-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Loguercio AD, Uceda-Gomez N, Carrilho MR, Reis A (2005) Influence of specimen size and regional variation on long-term resin-dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 21:224–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tsuchiya K, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsubota K, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Effect of functional monomer (MDP) on the enamel bond durability of single-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 124:96–102.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12232 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soshi Suzuki
    • 1
  • Toshiki Takamizawa
    • 1
  • Arisa Imai
    • 1
  • Akimasa Tsujimoto
    • 1
  • Keiichi Sai
    • 1
  • Masayuki Takimoto
    • 1
  • Wayne W. Barkmeier
    • 2
  • Mark A. Latta
    • 2
  • Masashi Miyazaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Operative DentistryNihon University School of DentistryTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of General DentistryCreighton University School of DentistryOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations