Fluoride in saliva and dental biofilm after 1500 and 5000 ppm fluoride exposure
The aim of this randomized, double-blind, crossover study was to measure fluoride in saliva and 7-day-old biofilm fluid and biofilm solids after rinsing three times per day for 3 weeks with 0, 1500, or 5000 ppm fluoride (NaF).
Materials and methods
Following the 3-week wash-in/wash-out period, including 1 week of biofilm accumulation, saliva and biofilm samples were collected from 12 participants immediately before (background fluoride), and 10, 30, and 60 min after a single rinse. Biofilm samples were separated into fluid and solids, and samples were analyzed using a fluoride electrode (microanalysis).
The background fluoride concentration was statistically significantly higher in the 5000 compared to the 1500 ppm F rinse group in all three compartments (22.3 and 8.1 μM in saliva, 126.8 and 58.5 μM in biofilm fluid, and 10,940 and 4837 μmol/kg in biofilm solids). The 1-h fluoride accumulation for the 5000 ppm F rinse was higher than for the 1500 ppm F rinse in all three compartments, although not statistically significant for saliva and biofilm solids.
Regular exposure to 5000 ppm fluoride elevates background fluoride concentrations in saliva, biofilm fluid, and biofilm solids compared to 1500 ppm fluoride. Increasing the fluoride concentration almost 3.5 times (from 1500 to 5000 ppm) only elevates the background fluoride concentrations in saliva, biofilm fluid, and biofilm solids twofold.
Even though fluoride toothpaste may be diluted by saliva, the results of the present study indicate that use of 5000 ppm fluoride toothpaste might lead to improved caries control.
KeywordsFluorides Biofilm fluid Biofilm solids Saliva Dental plaque Dental caries
This study was funded by the private funds “Tandlægeforeningen (FORSKU),” “Familien Hede Nielsens Fond,” and “Fonden til fremme af Odontologisk Videnskab af 2001.” The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Central Denmark Region Committees on Health Research Ethics (case no. 1-10-72-165-14).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 7.Williams E (1949) Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Aust J Sci Res 2(2):149–168Google Scholar
- 14.Jacobson AP (1995) Low fluoride concentrations: their relevance to the inhibition of dental caries. PhD Thesis, University of GlasgowGoogle Scholar
- 19.Naumova EA, Dickten C, Jung R, Krauss F, Rubesamen H, Schmutsch K, Sandulescu T, Zimmer S, Arnold WH (2016) Dynamics of fluoride bioavailability in the biofilms of different oral surfaces after amine fluoride and sodium fluoride application. Sci Rep 6:18729. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18729 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar