Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinically used adhesive ceramic bonding methods: a survey in 2007, 2011, and in 2015

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of the study is to evaluate practices of dentists regarding adhesive cementation of all-ceramic restorations over a period of 8 years.

Materials and methods

The authors developed a questionnaire regarding adhesive cementation procedures for all-ceramic restorations. Restorations were distinguished between made out of silicate ceramic or oxide ceramic. The questionnaire was handed out to all dentists participating in a local annual dental meeting in Northern Germany. The returned questionnaires were analyzed to identify incorrect cementation procedures based upon current evidence-based technique from the scientific dental literature. The survey was conducted three times in 2007, 2011, and 2015 and their results were compared.

Results

For silicate ceramic restorations, 38–69 % of the participants used evidence-based bonding procedures; most of the incorrect bonding methods did not use a silane containing primer. In case of oxide ceramic restorations, most participants did not use air-abrasion prior to bonding. Only a relatively low rate (7–14 %) of dentists used evidence-based dental techniques for bonding oxide ceramics.

Conclusion

In adhesive cementation of all-ceramic restorations, the practices of surveyed dentists in Northern Germany revealed high rates of incorrect bonding. During the observation period, the values of evidence-based bonding procedures for oxide ceramics improved while the values for silicate ceramics declined. Based on these results, some survey participants need additional education for adhesive techniques.

Clinical relevance

Neglecting scientifically accepted methods for adhesive cementation of all-ceramic restorations may result in reduced longevity of all-ceramic restorations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Attia A, Kern M (2011) Long-term resin bonding to zirconia ceramic with a new universal primer. J Prosthet Dent 106:319–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Azimian F, Klosa K, Kern M (2012) Evaluation of a new universal primer for ceramics and alloys. J Adhes Dent 14:275–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kern M (2009) Resin bonding to oxide ceramics for dental restorations. J Adhes Sci Technol 23:1097–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B (2009) Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 88:817–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shahin R, Kern M (2010) Effect of air-abrasion on the retention of zirconia ceramic crowns luted with different cements before and after artificial aging. Dent Mater 26:922–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang B, Barloi A, Kern M (2010) Influence of air-abrasion on zirconia ceramic bonding using an adhesive composite resin. Dent Mater 26:44–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kern M, Wegner SM (1998) Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 14:64–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Quaas AC, Yang B, Kern M (2007) Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures. Dent Mater 23:506–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Klosa K, Wolfart S, Lehmann F, Wenz HJ, Kern M (2009) The effect of storage conditions, contamination modes and cleaning procedures on the resin bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic. J Adhes Dent 11:127–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu YC, Tseng H, Shih YH, Lee SY (2001) Effects of surface treatments on bond strength of glass-infiltrated ceramic. J Oral Rehabil 28:805–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang B, Scharnberg M, Wolfart S, Quaas AC, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M (2007) Influence of contamination on bonding to zirconia ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 81:283–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Attia A, Kern M (2011) Effect of cleaning methods after reduced-pressure air abrasion on bonding to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent 13:561–567

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M (2003) Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 89:268–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kern M, Thompson VP (1994) Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology, and changes in the surface composition. J Prosthet Dent 71:453–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lehmann F, Kern M (2009) Durability of resin bonding to zirconia ceramic using different primers. J Adhes Dent 11:479–483

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Attia A, Lehmann F, Kern M (2011) Influence of surface conditioning and cleaning methods on resin bonding to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 27:207–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R (2011) Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater 27:71–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M (2002) Bonding to silica based ceramics: clinical and laboratory guidelines. Quintessence Dent Technol 25:54–62

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kern M, Thompson VP (1995) Bonding to a glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 73:240–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kern M, Fechtig T, Strub JR (1994) Influence of water storage and thermal cycling on the fracture strength of all-porcelain, resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 71:251–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kern M (2015) Bonding to oxide ceramics—laboratory testing versus clinical outcome. Dent Mater 31:8–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Papia E, Larsson C, du Toit M, Vult von Steyern P (2014) Bonding between oxide ceramics and adhesive cement systems: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 102:395–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L (1999) The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 15:426–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L (2000) Strength and reliability of surface treated Y-TZP dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 53:304–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guazzato M, Quach L, Albakry M, Swain MV (2005) Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent 33:9–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Kosmac T, Funduk N, Marion L (2004) Fracture resistance and reliability of new zirconia posts. J Prosthet Dent 91:342–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Quach L, Swain MV (2004) Influence of grinding, sandblasting, polishing and heat treatment on the flexural strength of a glass-infiltrated alumina-reinforced dental ceramic. Biomaterials 25:2153–2160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP (2004) Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 71B:381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Malament KA, Thompson VP, Rekow ED (2006) Damage accumulation and fatigue life of particle-abraded ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 19:442–448

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kern M, Sasse M (2011) Ten-year survival of anterior all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses. J Adhes Dent 13:407–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Abou Tara M, Eschbach S, Wolfart S, Kern M (2011) Zirconia ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses—first clinical results with a new design. J Dent 39:208–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sasse M, Kern M (2014) Survival of anterior cantilevered all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses made from zirconia ceramic. J Dent 42:660–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wada T (1986) Development of a new adhesive material and its properties. In: Gettleman L, Vrijhoef MMA, Uchiyama Y (eds) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adhesive Prosthodontics. Academy of Dental Materials, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Chicago, pp 9–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank Stefan Wolfart for his input in developing the questionnaire, Farhad Azimian for performing the survey in 2011 and data analysis, and Nadine Arpe for performing the survey in 2007 and data cleaning.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Meyer.

Ethics declarations

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Funding

All authors have received no funding for working on the article.

Additional information

K. Klosa and G. Meyer contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klosa, K., Meyer, G. & Kern, M. Clinically used adhesive ceramic bonding methods: a survey in 2007, 2011, and in 2015. Clin Oral Invest 20, 1691–1698 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1684-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1684-0

Keywords

Navigation