Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reliability and failure modes of narrow implant systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Narrow implants are indicated in areas of limited bone width or when grafting is nonviable. However, the reduction of implant diameter may compromise their performance. This study evaluated the reliability of several narrow implant systems under fatigue, after restored with single-unit crowns.

Materials and methods

Narrow implant systems were divided (n = 18 each), as follows: Astra (ASC); BioHorizons (BSC); Straumann Roxolid (SNC), Intra-Lock (IMC), and Intra-Lock one-piece abutment (ILO). Maxillary central incisor crowns were cemented and subjected to step-stress accelerated life testing in water. Use level probability Weibull curves and reliability for a mission of 100,000 cycles at 130- and 180-N loads (90 % two-sided confidence intervals) were calculated. Scanning electron microscopy was used for fractography.

Results

Reliability for 100,000 cycles at 130 N was ∼99 % in group ASC, ∼99 % in BSC, ∼96 % in SNC, ∼99 % in IMC, and ∼100 % in ILO. At 180 N, reliability of ∼34 % resulted for the ASC group, ∼91 % for BSC, ∼53 % for SNC, ∼70 % for IMC, and ∼99 % for ILO. Abutment screw fracture was the main failure mode for all groups.

Conclusions

Reliability was not different between systems for 100,000 cycles at the 130-N load. A significant decrease was observed at the 180-N load for ASC, SNC, and IMC, whereas it was maintained for BSC and ILO.

Clinical relevance

The investigated narrow implants presented mechanical performance under fatigue that suggests their safe use as single crowns in the anterior region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Chuang SK, Weber HP, Gallucci GO (2012) A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:102–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Khraisat A, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O (2002) Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs. J Prosthet Dent 88:604–610. doi:10.1067/mpr.2002.129384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Malo P, Nobre MD (2011) Implants (3.3 mm diameter) for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior regions: a retrospective clinical study with up to 11 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 13:95–103. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00188.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Allum SR, Tomlinson RA, Joshi R (2008) The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res 19:553–559. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01395.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirata R, Bonfante EA, Machado LS, Tovar N, Coelho PG (2014) Mechanical evaluation of four narrow-diameter implant systems. Int J Prosthodont 27:359–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cehreli MC, Akca K (2004) Narrow-diameter implants as terminal support for occlusal three-unit FPDs: a biomechanical analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 24:513–519

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Carinci F (2008) Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants: a retrospective study of 510 implants. J Periodontol 79:49–54. doi:10.1902/jop.2008.070248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kitagawa T, Tanimoto Y, Odaki M, Nemoto K, Aida M (2005) Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 75:457–463. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.30328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Freitas-Junior AC, Rocha EP, Bonfante EA, Almeida EO, Anchieta RB, Martini AP, Assuncao WG, Silva NR, Coelho PG (2012) Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: an in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis. Dent Mater 28:e218–e228. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2012.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parrington R (2002) Fractography of metals and plastics. ASM International

  11. Coelho PG, Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Guess PC, Rekow ED, Thompson VP (2009) Fatigue testing of two porcelain-zirconia all-ceramic crown systems. Dent Mater 25:1122–1127. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Coelho PG, Bonfante EA, Silva NR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP (2009) Laboratory simulation of Y-TZP all-ceramic crown clinical failures. J Dent Res 88:382–386. doi:10.1177/0022034509333968

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bonfante EA, Almeida EO, Lorenzoni FC, Coelho PG (2015) Effects of implant diameter and prosthesis retention system on the reliability of single crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30:95–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martins LM, Bonfante EA, Zavanelli RA, Freitas Jr AC, Silva NR, Marotta L, Coelho PG (2012) Fatigue reliability of 3 single-unit implant-abutment designs. Implant Dent 21:67–71. doi:10.1097/ID.0b013e31823fcc9f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Freitas Jr AC, Bonfante EA, Martins LM, Silva NR, Marotta L, Coelho PG (2011) Reliability and failure modes of anterior single-unit implant-supported restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:1005–1011. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02269.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Almeida EO, Freitas Junior AC, Bonfante EA, Rocha EP, Silva NR, Coelho PG (2012) Effect of microthread presence and restoration design (screw versus cemented) in dental implant reliability and failure modes. Clin Oral Implants Res 24:191–196. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02437.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Almeida EO, Freitas Jr AC, Bonfante EA, Marotta L, Silva NR, Coelho PG (2013) Mechanical testing of implant-supported anterior crowns with different implant/abutment connections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 28:103–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Freitas AC, Jr., Bonfante EA, Rocha EP, Silva NR, Marotta L, Coelho PG (2011) Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns. Eur J Oral Sci 119:323–330. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00837.x

  19. Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Navarro Jr JM, Pegoraro LF, Bonfante G, Thompson VP, Silva NR (2010) Reliability and failure modes of implant-supported Y-TZP and MCR three-unit bridges. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 12:235–243. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00156.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abernethy R (2006) The new Weibull handbook. Dr. Robert B, Abernethy, North Palm Beach, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  21. Silva NR, Coelho PG, Fernandes CA, Navarro JM, Dias RA, Thompson VP (2009) Reliability of one-piece ceramic implant. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 88:419–426. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nelson W (2004) Accelerated testing: statistical models, test plans and data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  23. Manda MG, Psyllaki PP, Tsipas DN, Koidis PT (2009) Observations on an in-vivo failure of a titanium dental implant/abutment screw system: a case report. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 89:264–273. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reliasoft (2010) The Weibull distribution and beta. http://www.reliasoft.com/newsletter/1q2001/beta.htm. Accessed Acces Date

  25. Nelson W (1990) Book title. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Barber HD, Seckinger RJ (1994) The role of the small-diameter dental implant: a preliminary report on the miniplant system. Compendium 15(1390):1392

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bidra AS, Almas K (2013) Mini implants for definitive prosthodontic treatment: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 109:156–164. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60035-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McCracken M (1999) Dental implant materials: commercially pure titanium and titanium alloys. J Prosthodont 8:40–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hirata R, Bonfante EA, Machado LS, Tovar N, Coelho PG (in press 2015) Mechanical evaluation of two titanium alloy grades used in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant.

  30. Freitas Junior AC, Bonfante EA, Silva NR, Marotta L, Coelho PG (2011) Effect of implant-abutment connection design on reliability of crowns: regular vs. horizontal mismatched platform. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:1123–1126. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02257.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Roach M, Williamson RS, Zardiackas L (2005) Comparison of the corrosion fatigue characteristics of CP Ti grade 4, Ti-6Al-4V ELI, Ti-6Al-7Nb, and Ti-15Mo. In: International A (ed) Book title.,

  32. Suzuki M, Bonfante E, Silva NRFA, Coelho PG (2011) Reliability testing of indirect composites as single implant restorations. J Prosthodont Implant Esthet Reconst Dent 20:528–534. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00754.x

    Google Scholar 

  33. Almeida EO, Junior AC, Bonfante EA, Silva NR, Coelho PG (2012) Reliability evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched versus laser-sintered dental implants. Lasers Med Sci. doi:10.1007/s10103-012-1170-8

    Google Scholar 

  34. Freitas-Junior AC, Almeida EO, Bonfante EA, Silva NR, Coelho PG (2012) Reliability and failure modes of internal conical dental implant connections. Clin Oral Implants Res 24:197–202. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02443.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Freitas-Junior AC, Bonfante EA, Martins LM, Silva NR, Marotta L, Coelho PG (2011) Effect of implant diameter on reliability and failure modes of molar crowns. Int J Prosthodont 24:557–561

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Estevam A. Bonfante.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was partially supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), grant no. 309475/2014-7, by FAPESP nos. 2013/20806-0 and 2014/22859-6, and by Intra-Lock International, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hirata, R., Bonfante, E.A., Anchieta, R.B. et al. Reliability and failure modes of narrow implant systems. Clin Oral Invest 20, 1505–1513 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1636-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1636-8

Keywords

Navigation