Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Periodontal response to two different subgingival restorative margin designs: a 12-month randomized clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Subgingival margin placement is sometimes required due to different reasons and is often associated with adverse periodontal reactions. The purpose of this study was to determine if a single restoration with subgingival margin on a tooth, in the maxillary anterior zone, would affect its periodontal soft tissue parameters, and whether or not a deep chamfer preparation has a different influence in the periodontium when compared to a feather edge preparation.

Material and methods

Plaque and gingival indexes, periodontal probing depth, bleeding on probing, and patient’s biotype were registered. One hundred six teeth were prepared with a deep chamfer, while 94 were prepared with a feather edge finishing line. Twelve months after the restoration delivery, the same parameters were evaluated. Repeated measure one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α = 0.05) was used.

Results

A statistically significant difference between the baseline and the 12-month follow-up is present in regard to plaque index, gingival index, and periodontal probing depth, but no statistically significant difference between chamfer and feather edge finishing lines. There is a statistically significant difference between the baseline and the 12-month follow-up in regard to bleeding on probing. Feather edge preparation presents significantly more bleeding on probing and less gingival recession than the chamfer.

Conclusions

Subgingival margins do influence the periodontal soft tissue response. Statistically significant difference exists between feather edge and chamfer finishing lines in regard to bleeding on probing and gingival recession.

Clinical relevance

Subgingival margins should be carefully selected, especially when feather edge finishing line is utilized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenstiel S, Land M, Fujimoto J (2006) Contemporary fixed prosthodontics, 4th edn. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, pp 209-257, 544-546

  2. Rufenacht CR (1990) Fundamentals of esthetics. Quintessence, Chicago, p 77

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ (2007) Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 98:389–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Paniz G, Kang K, Kim Y, Kumagai N, Hirayama H (2013) Influence of coping design on the cervical color of ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 110:495–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Naylor WP, Beatty MW (1992) Materials and techniques in fixed prosthodontics. Dent Clin N Am 36:665–692

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiche GJ, Pinault A (1994) Esthetics of anterior fixed prosthodontics. Quintessence, Chicago, pp 75-89, 143-159

  7. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA (2001) Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 85:363–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tan PL, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Stanford CM, Tan SC, Johnson WT, Dawson D (2005) In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated central incisors with varying ferrule heights and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 93:331–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kois JC (1994) Altering gingival levels: the restorative connection part I: biologic variables. J Esthet Dent 6:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Loi I, Di Felice A (2013) Biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT): a new approach for prosthetic restoration of periodontically healthy teeth. Eur J Esthet Dent 8:10–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Waerhaug J, Philos D (1968) Periodontology and partial prosthesis. Int Dent J 18:101–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Silness J, Hegdahl T (1970) Area of the exposed zinc phosphate cement surfaces in fixed restorations. Scand J Dent Res 78:163–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones JC (1972) The success rate of anterior crowns. Br Dent J 132:399–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saltzberg DS, Ceravolo FJ, Holstein F, Groom G, Gottsegen R (1976) Scanning electron microscope study of the junction between restorations and gingival cavosurface margins. J Prosthet Dent 36:517–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Janenko C (1979) Anterior crowns and gingival health. Aust Dent J 24:225–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Silness J (1980) Fixed prosthodontics and periodontal health. Dent Clin N Am 24:317–329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perel ML (1971) Axial crown contours. J Prosthet Dent 25:642–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Perel ML (1971) Periodontal considerations of crown contours. J Prosthet Dent 26:627–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weisgold AS (1977) Contours of the full crown restoration. Alpha Omegan 70:77–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marcum J (1967) The effect of crown marginal depth upon gingival tissue. J Prosthet Dent 17:479–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Newcomb GM (1974) The relationship between the location of subgingival crown margins and gingival inflammation. J Periodontol 45:151–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K (1983) Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 10:563–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Flores-de-Jacoby L, Zafiropoulos GG, Ciancio S (1989) The effect of crown margin location on plaque and periodontal health. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 9:197–205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maynard JG Jr, Wilson RD (1979) Physiologic dimensions of the periodontium significant to the restorative dentist. J Periodontol 50:107–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nevins M, Skurow HM (1984) The intracrevicular restorative margin, the biologic width, and the maintenance of the gingival margin. Int J Periodontol Rest Dent 4:30–49

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tarnow D, Stahl SS, Magner A, Zamzok J (1986) Human gingival attachment responses to subgingival crown placement marginal remodelling. J Clin Periodontol 13:563–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brandau HE, Yaman P, Molvar M (1988) Effect of restorative procedures for a porcelain jacket crown on gingival health and height. Am J Dent 1:119–122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Koth DL (1982) Full crown restorations and gingival inflammation in a controlled population. J Prosthet Dent 48:681–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jameson LM (1979) Comparison of the volume of crevicular fluid from restored and nonrestored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 41:209–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kent LK, Campbell SD (2000) Periodontal tissue responses after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 84:492–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP (1991) Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 65:357–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Muller HP (1986) The effect of artificial crown margins at the gingival margin on the periodontal conditions in a group of periodontally supervised patients treated with fixed bridges. J Clin Periodontol 13:97–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Valderhaug J, Ellingsen JE, Jokstad A (1993) Oral hygiene, periodontal conditions and carious lesions in patients treated with dental bridges. A 15-year clinical and radiographic follow-up study. J Clin Periodontol 20:482–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schätzle M, Land NP, Anerud A, Boysen H, Burgin W, Loe H (2001) The influence of margins of restorations of the periodontal tissues over 26 years. J Clin Periodontol 28:57–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bader J, Rozier RG, McFall WT Jr (1991) The effect of crown receipt on measures of gingival status. J Dent Res 70:1386–1389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Koke U, Sander C, Heinecke A, Mller HP (2003) A possible influence of gingival dimensions on attachment loss and gingival recession following placement of artificial crowns. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 23:439–445

    Google Scholar 

  37. Padbury A Jr, Eber R, Wang HL (2003) Interactions between the gingiva and the margin of restorations. J Clin Periodontol 30:379–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Giollo MD, Valle PM, Gomes SC, Rosing CK (2007) A retrospective clinical, radiographic and microbiological study of periodontal conditions of teeth with and without crowns. Braz Oral Res 21:348–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Orkin DA, Reddy J, Bradshaw D (1987) The relationship of the position of crown margins to gingival health. J Prosthet Dent 57:421–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gemalmaz D, Ergin S (2002) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 87:189–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Müller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, Eger T (2000) Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol 27:621–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Miller PD Jr (1985) A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 5:8–13

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kao RT, Pasquinelli K (2002) Thick vs. thin gingival tissue: a key determinant in tissue response to disease and restorative treatment. J Calif Dent Assoc 30:521–526

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Stetler KJ, Bissada NF (1987) Significance of the width of keratinized gingival on the periodontal status of the teeth with submarginal restorations. J Periodontol 58:696–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Valderhaug J (1980) Periodontal conditions and carious lesions following the insertion of fixed prostheses: a 10-year follow-up study. Int Dent J 30:296–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wennstrom J, Lindhe J (1983) Role of attached gingival for maintenance of periodontal health. Healing following excisional and grafting procedures in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 10:206–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wennstrom J, Lindhe J (1983) Plaque-induced gingival inflammation in the absence of attached gingival in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 10:226–276

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tao J, Wu Y, Chen J, Su J (2014) A follow-up study of up to 5 years of metal-ceramic crowns in the maxillary central incisors for different gingival biotypes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 34:e85–e92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Valderhaug J, Birkeland JM (1976) Periodontal conditions in patients 5 years following insertion of fixed prostheses. J Oral Rehabil 3:237–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shavell HM (1988) Mastering the art of tissue management during provisionalization and biologic final impressions. Int J Periodontics Restovative Dent 8:25–43

    Google Scholar 

  51. Waerhaug J (1981) Effect of toothbrushing on subgingival plaque formation. J Periodontol 52:30–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Loi I, Di Felice A (2013) Biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT): a new approach for prosthetic restoration of periodontally healthy teeth. Eur J Esthet Dent 8:10–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mühlemann HR, Son S (1971) Gingival sulcus bleeding—a leading symptom in initial gingivitis. Helv Odontol Acta 15:107–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ainamo J, Bay I (1975) Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 25:229–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Brunette DM, Hornby K, Oakley C (2007) Critical thinking. Understanding and evaluating dental research, 2nd edn, Quintessence, Chicago, pp. 231-244

  56. Hackshaw A, Paul E, Davenport E (2006) Evidence-based dentistry. An introduction, Blackwell Munksgaard, Oxford, pp. 68-100, 172-185

  57. Richards D, Clarkson J, Matthews D, Niederman R (2008) Evidence-based dentistry: managing information for better practice. Quintessence, London, pp 77–91

    Google Scholar 

  58. Badersten A, Nilveus R, Egelberg J (1981) Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy I. Moderate and advanced periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 8:57–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sillness J, Löe H (1964) Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontal Scand 22:121–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Löe H, Silness J (1963) Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontal Scand 21:533–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Smith DH (2010) Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 30:237–243

    Google Scholar 

  62. O’Brien WJ (2002) Dental materials and their selection, 3rd edn. Quintessence, Chicago, pp 121–122

    Google Scholar 

  63. Michalakis K, Pissiotis A, Hirayama H, Kang K, Kafantaris N (2006) Comparison of temperature increase in the pulp chamber during the polymerization of materials used for the direct fabrication of provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent 96:418–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Pontoriero R, Carnevale G (2001) Surgical crown lengthening: a 12-month clinical wound healing study. J Periodontol 72:841–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ruel J, Schuessler PJ, Malament K, Mori D (1980) Effect of retraction procedures on the periodontium in humans. J Prosthet Dent 44:508–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Albandar JM, Buischi YA, Axelsson P (1995) Caries lesions and dental restorations as predisposing factors in the progression of periodontal diseases in adolescents. A 3-year longitudinal study. J Periodontol 66:249–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Paolantonio M, D’Ercole S, Perinetti G, Tripodi D, Catamo G, Serra E, Brue C, Piccolomini R (2004) Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations. J Clin Periodontol 31:200–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Schatzle M, Land NP, Anerud A, Boysen H, Burgin W, Loe H (2001) The influence of margins of restorations of the periodontal tissues over 26 years. J Clin Periodontol 28:57–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Newcomb G (1974) The relationship between the location of subgingival crown margins and inflammation. J Periodontol 45:151–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Reeves WG (1991) Restorative margin placement and periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 66:733–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Chan C, Weber H (1987) Plaque retention on teeth restored with full ceramic crowns: a comparative study. J Prosthet Dent 56:666–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Renggli HH, Regolati B (1972) Gingival inflammation and plaque accumulation by well-adapted supragingival and subgingival proximal restorations. Helv Odontol Acta 16:99–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Mörmann W, Regolati B, Renggli HH (1974) Gingival reaction to well-fitted subgingival proximal gold inlays. J Clin Periodontol 1:120–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Waerhaug J (1980) Temporary restorations: advantages and disadvantages. Dent Clin N Am 24:305–306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Nayak RP, Wade AB (1977) The relative effectiveness of plaque removal by the proxabrush and rubber cone stimulator. J Clin Periodontol 4:128–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Dragoo MR, Williams GB (1981) Periodontal tissue reactions to restorative procedures. Part I. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2:8–29

    Google Scholar 

  77. Dragoo MR, Williams GB (1982) Periodontal tissue reactions to restorative procedures. Part II. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2:34–42

    Google Scholar 

  78. Yuodelis RA, Weaver JD, Sapkos S (1973) Facial and lingual contours of artificial complete crown restorations and their effects on the periodontium. J Prosthet Dent 29:61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Silva NRFA, Bonfante EA, Martins LM, Valverde GB, Thompson VP, Coelho PG (2012) Reliability of reduced-thickness and thinly veneered lithium disilicate crowns. J Dent Res 91:305–310

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Hodges K (1998) Concepts in nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Delmar, New York, pp 57–58

    Google Scholar 

  81. Liu KZ, Xiang XM, Man A, Sowa MG, Cholakis A, Ghiabi E, Singer DL, Scott DA (2009) In vivo determination of multiple indices of periodontal inflammation by optical spectroscopy. J Periodontol Restor 44:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Ochsenbien C, Ross S (1969) A re-evaluation of osseous surgery. Dent Clin N Am 13:87–102

    Google Scholar 

  83. Claffey N, Shanley D (1986) Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 13:654–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Lindhe J (1989) Esthetics and periodontal therapy. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp 477–514

    Google Scholar 

  85. Becker W, Ochsenbien C, Tibbetts L, Becker BE (1997) Alveolar bone anatomic profiles as measured from dry skulls. Clinical ramifications. J Clin Periodontol 24:727–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Kao RT, Pasquinelli K (2002) Thick vs thin gingival tissue: a key determinant in tissue response to disease and restorative treatment. J Calif Dent Assoc 30:521–526

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dimitris Kugiumtzis, PhD, Associate Professor of Statistics, School of Engineering, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece, for his guidance and invaluable assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose Nart.

Ethics declarations

This prospective study was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, and the research protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Padova (2737P/2013), prior to patient enrollment. Additionally, this clinical study was registered at the US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry (NCT02276586). Patients were notified that their data would be collected and used for a statistical analysis. A signed informed consent was obtained from all patients enrolled in this study. This article does not contain any studies with animal performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paniz, G., Nart, J., Gobbato, L. et al. Periodontal response to two different subgingival restorative margin designs: a 12-month randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 20, 1243–1252 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1616-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1616-z

Keywords

Navigation