Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 1–14 | Cite as

Efficacy and safety of over-the-counter whitening strips as compared to home-whitening with 10 % carbamide peroxide gel—systematic review of RCTs and metanalysis

  • Carla Regina Serraglio
  • Luana Zanella
  • Karine Battestin Dalla-Vecchia
  • Sinval Adalberto Rodrigues-JuniorEmail author
Review

Abstract

Objectives

The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of over-the-counter whitestrips with the American Dental Association (ADA)-recommended home-whitening using the 10 % carbamide peroxide gel.

Materials and methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of the whitestrips with the 10 % carbamide peroxide (10 % CP) gel applied on tray for tooth whitening in adults were searched at PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases and selected up to October 2014. Efficacy of the whitening techniques was assessed through ∆E, ∆L, and ∆b parameters, while side effects were analyzed as dichotomous variables. Data was extracted independently by two reviewers. Metanalysis was performed using random- and fixed-effect models (RevMan 5.3).

Results

Eight studies were included in the metanalysis. The metanalysis revealed no significant difference between the intervention groups for tooth-whitening efficacy measured as ΔE (mean difference [MD]−0.53; 95 % CI [−1.72;0.66]; Z = 0.88; p = 0.38) and ΔL (MD−0.22; 95 % CI [−0.81;0.36]; z = 0.75; p = 0.45); reduction of yellowing was higher with the whitestrips (MD−0.47; 95 % CI [−0.89; −0.06]; Z = 2.25; p = 0.02). Tooth sensitivity (risk ratio [RR] 1.17; 95 % CI [0.81–1.69]; Z = 0.81; p = 0.42) and gingival sensitivity (RR 0.76; 95 % CI [0.53–1.10]; Z = 1.44; p = 0.15) were similar, regardless of the whitening method used. The observed gingival irritation was higher when the 10 % CP gel was applied on tray (RR 0.43; 95 % CI [0.20–0.93]; Z = 2.14; p = 0.03). The quality of evidence generated was rated very low for all outcomes.

Conclusions

There is no sound evidence to support the use of the whitening strips in detriment of the ADA-recommended technique based on the 10 % carbamide peroxide gel applied on tray.

Clinical relevance

To the moment, there is no sound evidence in dental literature to suggest that the ADA-recommended whitening technique based on 10 % carbamide peroxide gel could be substituted by the whitening strips. The existing studies, with their limitations, revealed similar tooth whitening and tooth and gingival sensitivity for both whitening techniques.

Keywords

Tooth whitening Whitestrips Systematic review Metanalysis Randomized controlled trials 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Gustavo Porfírio, from the Brazilian Cochrane Center, for his insights concerning methodological issues of this systematic review.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript certify that they have no interest of any nature or kind in any product, service, and/or company presented in this article. The study had no external funding.

References

  1. 1.
    American Dental Association (ADA) (2009) Tooth whitening/bleaching: treatment considerations for dentists and their patients. Retrieved online February 13, 2014 from: http://www.ada.org/sections/about/pdfs/HOD_whitening_rpt.pdf.
  2. 2.
    Haywood VB, Heymann HO (1989) Nightguard vital bleaching. Quintessence Int 20:173–176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tortopidis D, Hatzikyriakos A, Kokoti M, Menexes G, Tsiggos N (2007) Evaluation of the relationship between subjects’ perception and professional assessment of esthetic treatment needs. J Esthet Restor Dent 19:154–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Demarco FF, Meireles SS, Masotti AS (2009) Over-the-counter whitening agents: a concise review. Braz Oral Res 23:64–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    American Dental Association (2001) Whitening toothpastes. J Am Dent Assoc 132:1146–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barbieri GM, Mota EG, Rodrigues-Junior SA, Burnett Jr LH (2011) Effect of whitening dentifrices on the surface roughness of commercial composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 23:338–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eimar H, Siciliano R, Abdallah M-N, Nader SA, Amin WM, Matinez P-P, et al. (2012) Hydrogen peroxide whitens teeth by oxidizing the organic structure. J Dent 40s:e25–e33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gerlach RW (2000) Shifting paradigms in whitening: introduction of a novel system for vital tooth bleaching. Compend Contin Educ Dent 21:S4–S9Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Donly KJ, Segura A, Henson T, Barker ML, Gerlach RW (2007) Randomized controlled trial of professional at-home tooth whitening in teenagers. Gen Dent 55:669–674PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hasson H, Ismail A, Gisele N (2006) Home-based chemically-induced whitening of teeth in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 11, Art. No. CD006202. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006202.pub4.
  11. 11.
    Meireles SS, Goettems ML, Dantas RVF, Della Bona A, Santos IS, Demarco FF (2014) Changes in oral health related quality of life after dental bleaching in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent 42:114–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papas AS, Kugel G, Singh M, Barker ML, Gerlach RW (2009) Placebo-controlled clinical trial of use of 10 % hydrogen peroxide whitening strips for medication-induced xerostomia. Gerontology 55:551–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meireles SS, Santos IS, Della Bona A, Demarco FF (2010) A double-blind randomized clinical trial of two carbamide peroxide tooth bleaching agents: 2-year follow-up. J Dent 38:956–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff MC, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Br Med J 339:b2700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Commission Internationale De L’Eclairage (1978) Recommendations on uniform colour spaces, colour difference equations and psychometric colour terms; 15 (Supplement 2). Bureau Central de la CIE., ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  17. 17.
    Review Manager (RevMan) (2014) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Auschill TM, Hellwig E, Schmidale S, Sculean A, Arweiler NB (2005) Efficacy, side-effects and patients’ acceptance of different bleaching techniques (OTC, in office, at-home). Oper Dent 30:152–163Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gerlach RW, Gibb RD, Sagel PA (2000) A randomized clinical trial comparing a novel 5.3 % hydrogen peroxide whitening strip to 10 %, 15 %, and 20 % carbamide peroxide tray-based bleaching systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent 29:S22–S28Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gerlach RW, Barker ML, Sagel PA (2001) Comparative efficacy and tolerability of two direct-to-consumer tooth whitening systems. Am J Dent 14:267–272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gerlach RW, Zhou X (2002) Comparative clinical efficacy of two professional bleaching systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent 23:35–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karpinia KA, Magnusson I, Sagel PA, Zhou X, Gerlach RW (2002) Vital bleaching with two at-home professional systems. Am J Dent 15:13A–18APubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karpinia K, Magnusson I, Barker M, Gerlach RW (2003) Clinical comparison of two self-directed bleaching systems. J Prosthodont 12:242–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bizhang M, Chun Y-PH, Damerau K, Singh P, Raab WH-M, Zimmer S (2009) Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of three different bleaching methods. Oper Dent 34:635–641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hannig C, Lindner D, Attin T (2007) Efficacy and tolerability of two home bleaching systems having different peroxide delivery. Clin Oral Investig 11:321–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Monticelli F, Kugel G, Barker ML, Gerlach RW (2007) Daytime use of a custom bleaching tray or whitening strips: initial and sustained color improvement. Am J Dent 20:19A–22APubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pinto MM, Godoy CHL, Bortoletto CC, Olivan SRG, Motta LJ, Altavista OM, et al. (2014) Tooth whitening with hydrogen peroxide in adolescentes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 15:395PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kihn PW, Barnes DM, Romberg E, Peterson K (2000) A clinical evaluation of 10 % vs. 15 %. J Am Dent Assoc 131:1478–1484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Heymann HO (2005) Tooth whitening: facts and fallacies. Br Dent J 198:514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Matis BA, Cochran MA, Franco M, Al-Ammar W, Eckert GJ, Stropes M (2007) Eight in-office tooth whitening systems evaluated in vivo: a pilot study. Oper Dent 32:322–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gerlach RW, Barker ML, Karpinia K, Magnusson I (2009) Single site meta-analysis of 6 % hydrogen peroxide whitening strip effectiveness and safety over 2 weeks. J Dent 37:360–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, West SussexCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Leonard RH, Sharma A, Haywood VB (1998) Use of different concentration of carbamide peroxide for bleaching. Quintessence Int 29:503–507PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Markowitz K (2010) Pretty painful: Why does tooth bleaching hurt? Med Hypotheses 74:835–840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. (2011a) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction – GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64:383–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. (2010) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Br Med J 340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, et al. (2011b) GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1283–1293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carla Regina Serraglio
    • 1
    • 4
  • Luana Zanella
    • 1
    • 4
  • Karine Battestin Dalla-Vecchia
    • 2
  • Sinval Adalberto Rodrigues-Junior
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.School of DentistryCommunity University of the Region of Chapecó—UnochapecóChapecóBrazil
  2. 2.Private PracticeChapecóBrazil
  3. 3.Post-Graduate Program in Health SciencesCommunity University of the Region of Chapecó – UnochapecóChapecóBrazil
  4. 4.Universidade Comunitária da Região de ChapecóChapecóBrasil

Personalised recommendations