Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shear bond strength between veneering composite and PEEK after different surface modifications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to test the influence of different surface treatments and conditioning on the shear bond strength between polyetherketone (PEEK) and composite.

Materials and methods

Surfaces (570 plates) were used untreated, etched, air-particle abraded or activated with silica-modified alumina oxide. Surface roughness was determined after different treatments. Cylinders of composite were polymerized onto the surfaces. Eighteen different pre-treatment combinations were applied, partly combined with opaque application. Shear bond strength (SBS) was determined following ISO TR 11405. Baseline tests were performed 24 h after composite polymerization. For investigating the influence of storage and aging, the specimens were either stored in distilled water (37 °C, 90 days) or thermally cycled (12,000 cycles 5 °C/55 °C, distilled water). Means and standard deviations were calculated (statistics: one-way ANOVA/Bonferroni (α = 0.05)).

Results

Surface roughness varied between 0.04 ± 0.01 and 6.76 ± 1.11 μm. Only etching caused a significant (p < 0.001) increase. SBS strongly varied between 0.0 ± 0.0 and 23.2 ± 2.1 MPa. After thermal cycling (TC), nine of the investigated systems showed SBS higher than 5 MPa, varying from 8.8 ± 2.7 MPa (#7) to 19.4 ± 2.5 MPa (#4). After water storage, nine systems provided SBS higher than 5 MPa, seven even values higher than 10 MPa. Maximum SBS was 27.1 ± 3.1 MPa (#2) and lowest value was 5.4 ± 2.6 MPa (#4). Significant (p < 0.001) differences were found between the individual systems after 24 h, TC and after 90 days storage.

Conclusions

For good bonding between PEEK and composite, cleaning and roughening is recommended. Surface conditioning prior to bonding seems essential. Combination with opaque revealed an increase in SBS.

Clinical relevance

Successful bonding on PEEK surfaces can be achieved by surface roughening and subsequent surface activation with acetone- or phosphate-based methacrylate primers or tribochemical treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwitalla A, Müller WD (2013) PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol 39:743–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tannous F, Steiner M, Shahin R, Kern M (2012) Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Dent Mater 28:273–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meningaud JP, Spahn F, Donsimoni JM (2012) After titanium, PEEK? Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 113:407–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, Schmidlin PR (2013) Polyetheretherketone—a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 101:1209–1216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Santing HJ, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Özcan M (2012) Fracture strength and failure mode of maxillary implant-supported provisional single crowns: a comparison of composite resin crowns fabricated directly over PEEK abutments and solid titanium abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14:882–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu X, Liu X, Wei J, Ma J, Deng F, Wei S (2012) Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Nanomedicine 7:1215–1225

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee WT, Koak JY, Lim YJ, Kim SK, Kwon HB, Kim MJ (2012) Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 100:1044–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams DF, McNamara A (1987) Potential of polyetherketone (PEEK) and carbon-fibre-reinfroced PEEK in medical applications. J Mater Sci Lett 6:188–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stawarczyk B, Bähr N, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Gernet W, Jahn D, Schmidlin PR (2014) Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Investig 18:163–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kern M, Lehmann F (2012) Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK). Dent Mater 28:1280–1283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hämmerle CH, Fischer J (2010) Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater 26:553–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Behr M, Proff P, Kolbeck C, Langrieger S, Kunze J, Handel G, Rosentritt M (2011) The bond strength of the resin-to-zirconia interface using different bonding concepts. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4:2–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Gröger G, Handel G (2003) Adhesive bond of veneering composites on various metal surfaces using silicoating, titanium-coating or functional monomers. J Dent 31:33–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. ISO/TR 11405 (1994) Dental materials—guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Beuth, Berlin

  15. Rosentritt M, Behr M, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ (2009) Shear bond strength of cement to zirconia. J Adhes Sci Technol 23:1125–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hallmann L, Mehl A, Sereno N, Hämmerle CHF (2012) The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through different pre-treatments. Appl Surf Sci 258:7213–7218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Victrex, GB; PEEK user manual

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Rosentritt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosentritt, M., Preis, V., Behr, M. et al. Shear bond strength between veneering composite and PEEK after different surface modifications. Clin Oral Invest 19, 739–744 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1294-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1294-2

Keywords

Navigation