Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 18, Issue 8, pp 1913–1917 | Cite as

Evaluation of light-touch sensation in the buccal mucosa of leprosy patients

  • S. N. Marta
  • C. Sgavioli
  • P. P. Saraiva
  • R. S. Carvalho
  • M. G. A. Nogueira
  • F. C. Monti
  • M. VirmondEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the light-touch sensation of the oral mucosa in leprosy patients.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional study included 228 adults, 133 being leprosy patients and 95 normal controls. To assess light-touch sensation, the five-filament standard Semmes–Weinstein kit in eight regions of the oral mucosa was used. Chi-square test was used to verify the differences in responses between the studied groups.

Results

Normal sensation was predominant in both groups, and diminished sensation was found also in the nonleprosy group. Normal controls showed diminished light-touch sensation in at least one point, which may be attributed to the definition of sensation normality. The chi-square test revealed no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.43171). Severe diminished sensation was detected only in the leprosy group.

Conclusion

It is concluded that altered light-touch sensation in the oral cavity may not be a common feature in leprosy.

Clinical relevance

Decreased or lost sensation in skin lesions is a paramount in leprosy diagnosis; however, clinicians must be aware that this seems not to be true in the oral mucosa in leprosy cases for diagnosis purpose.

Keywords

Buccal mucosa Leprosy Semmes–Weinstein filament Sensory test Oral physiology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by the Paulista Foundation Against Leprosy.

Conflicts of interest

No conflicts of interest declared.

References

  1. 1.
    Sengupta U (2001) Immunopathology of leprosy: a state of the art. Int J Lepr 69:S36–S41Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sarno EN, Pessolani MCV (2001) Oldest and most feared disease. Lancet Suppl S39:358Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM et al (1995) Oral and maxillofacial pathology. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bucci FJ, Mese M, Schwartz RA et al (1987) Oral lesions in lepromatous leprosy. J Oral Med 42:4–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scheepers A, Lemmer J, Lownie JF (1993) Oral manifestations of leprosy. Lepr Rev 64:37–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tonello AS, Virmond MCL, Belmonte P, Zuchieri MABO, Monti JF, Belmonte G (2007) Oral health in leprosy patients. Indian J Lepr 79:37–45Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharma VK, Kaur S, Radotra BD et al (1993) Tongue involvement in lepromatous leprosy. Int J Dermatol 32:27–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ridley DS, Jopling WH (1966) Classification of leprosy according to immunity. A five-group system. Int J Lepr 34:255–273Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bodin IKH, Lind MG, Arnander C (1994) Free radial forearm flap reconstruction in surgery of the oral cavity and pharynx: surgical complications, impairment of speech and swallowing. Clin Otolaryngol 19:28–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boliek CA, Rieger JM, Li SYY, Mohamed Z, Kickham J, Amundsen K (2007) Establishing a reliable protocol to measure tongue sensation. J Oral Rehabil 34:433–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Watanabe Y, Ishikawa T, Kino K et al (2005) Relationship between oral sensory thresholds and depressive moods. J Med Dent Sci 52:72–80Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anderson AM, Croft RP (1999) Reliability of Semmes–Weinstein monofilament and ballpoint sensory testing, and voluntary muscle testing in Bangladesh. Lepr Rev 70:305–313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bell-Krotoski J, Tomancik E (1987) The repeatability of testing with Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Surg 12A:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sawyer DR, Alagumba LN, Lehnert JF (1987) Facial and oral manifestations of leprosy: an evaluation of the one hundred and four cases. J Oral Med 42:143–149Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scollard DM, Skinsnes OK (1999) Oral and maxillofacial pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 87:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Soni NK, Chatterji P (1981) Disturbance of taste in leprosy. J Laryngol Otol 95:717–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anuja N, Sherlin HJ, Anandan S, Mani NJ, Malathi N (2011) Subclinical changes of oral mucosa in Hansen’s disease—a histopathological and immunohistochemical study. Biol Med 3:31–42Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fokken WJ, Gijs SJ, Trenite N, Virmond M, Kleinjanvera ALG, Andrade NV (1998) The nose in leprosy: immunohistology of the nasal mucosa. Int J Lepr 66:328–337Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    van Brakel WH, Nicholls PG, Das L et al (2005) The INFIR Cohort Study: investigating prediction, detection and pathogenesis of neuropathy and reactions in leprosy. Methods and baseline results of a cohort of multibacillary leprosy patients in north India. Lepr Rev 76:14–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kets CM, VanN Leerdam ME, Van Brakel WH, Deville A, Bertelsmann FW (1996) References values for touch sensibility thresholds in healthy Nepalese volunteers. Lepr Rev 67:28–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jain S, Muzzafarullah S, Peri S, Ellanti R, Moorthy K et al (2008) Lower touch sensibility in the extremities of healthy Indians: further deterioration with age. J Peripher Nerv Syst 13:47–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dessirier JM, Simons CT, Carstens ML, O’Mahony M, Carstens E (2000) Psychophysical and neurobiological evidence that the oral sensation elicited by carbonated water is of chemogenic origin. Chem Senses 25:277–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Loewe IJ, Boliek CA, Harris J, Seikaly H, Rieger JM (2010) Sensation and function after tongue reconstruction. Head Neck 32:85–95Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Calhoun KH, Gibson B, Hartley L, Minton J, Hokanson JA (1992) Age-related changes in oral sensation. Laryngoscope 102:109–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Costa Nery JA, Oliveira M, Cuzzi T, Silva M (2003) Oral lesions in leprosy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 69:381–385Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. N. Marta
    • 1
  • C. Sgavioli
    • 1
  • P. P. Saraiva
    • 1
  • R. S. Carvalho
    • 1
  • M. G. A. Nogueira
    • 1
  • F. C. Monti
    • 2
  • M. Virmond
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Dentistry School, Graduate StudiesSacred Hearth UniversityBauruBrazil
  2. 2.School of MedicineFederal University of Sao CarlosSao CarlosBrazil
  3. 3.Rehabilitation CenterLauro Souza Lima Research InstituteBauruBrazil

Personalised recommendations