Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study was to quantify the blue light that passes through different incremental thicknesses of bulk fill in comparison to conventional resin-based composites (RBCs) and to relate it to the induced mechanical properties.
Materials and methods
Seven bulk fill, five nanohybrid and two flowable RBCs were analysed. Specimens (n = 5) of three incremental thicknesses (2, 4 and 6 mm) were cured from the top for 20 s, while at the bottom, a spectrometer monitored in real time the transmitted irradiance. Micro-mechanical properties (Vickers hardness, HV, and indentation modulus, E) were measured at the top and bottom after 24 h of storage in distilled water at 37 °C. Electron microscope images were taken for assessing the filler distribution and size.
Results
Bulk fill RBCs (except SonicFill) were more translucent than conventional RBCs. Low-viscosity bulk fill materials showed the lowest mechanical properties. HV depends highly on the following parameters: material (ηp 2 = 0.952), incremental thickness (0.826), filler volume (0.747), filler weight (0.746) and transmitted irradiance (0.491). The bottom-to-top HV ratio (HVbt) was higher than 80 % in all materials in 2- and 4-mm increments (except for Premise), whereas in 6-mm increments, this is valid only in four bulk fill materials (Venus Bulk Fill, SDR, x-tra fil, Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill).
Conclusions
The depth of cure is dependent on the RBC’s translucency. Low-viscosity bulk fill RBCs have lower mechanical properties than all other types of analysed materials. All bulk fill RBCs (except SonicFill) are more translucent for blue light than conventional RBCs.
Significance
Although bulk fill RBCs are generally more translucent, the practitioner has to follow the manufacturer’s recommendations on curing technique and maximum incremental thickness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferracane JL (2011) Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater 27(1):29–38. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020
Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB (2008) How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater 24(11):1501–1505. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.013
Rueggeberg F (1999) Contemporary issues in photocuring. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995) (25):S4–15; quiz S73.
Radhika M, Sajjan GS, Kumara Swami BN, Mittal N (2010) Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulations. J Conserv Dent 13(1):9–15. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.62633
Kwon Y, Ferracane J, Lee IB (2012) Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites. Dent Mater 28(7):801–809. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.028
Oliveira LC, Duarte S Jr, Araujo CA, Abrahao A (2010) Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations. Dent Mater 26(3):e159–e169. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.076
Heraeus Kulzer (2013) Venus Bulk Fill DFU.http://venusbulkfill.com/media/webmedia_local/media/pdfs/VenusBulkFillDFU_English.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
Ivoclar Vivadent Pty. Ltd. (2013) Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill DFU. http://www.ivoclarvivadent.com/zoolu-website/media/document/11227/Tetric + EvoCeram + Bulk + Fill. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
VOVO GmbH (2013) x-tra fil DFU. http://www.voco.com/en/products/_products/x_tra_fil/x-tra_fil_22spr_049.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
VOVO GmbH (2013) x-tra base DFU. http://www.voco.com/en/products/_products/x-tra_base/GI_x-tra_base_22spr_0811.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
DENTSPLY Caulk (2013) SureFil SDR DFU. http://www.caulk.com/assets/pdfs/products/51C006_SureFilSDR_(1–24–12).pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
3M ESPE Dental Products (2013) Filtek Bulk Fill DFU. http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?mwsId = SSSSSufSevTsZxtUoYtUn8_GevUqevTSevTSevTSeSSSSSS–&fn = filtek_bf_ifu_na_en.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
Kerr Corporation (2011) SonicFill DFU. http://www.kerrdental.com/index/cms-filesystem-action?file=/kerrdental-products-dfu/2011_SonicFill_[NA].pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2012
Ferracane JL (1995) Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 6(4):302–318
Czasch P, Ilie N (2012) In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 17(1):227–235. doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0702-8
Ilie N, Hickel R (2009) Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites. Clin Oral Investig 13(4):427–438. doi:10.1007/s00784-009-0258-4
Kwon TY, Bagheri R, Kim YK, Kim KH, Burrow MF (2012) Cure mechanisms in materials for use in esthetic dentistry. J Investig Clin Dent 3(1):3–16. doi:10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00114.x
Moszner N, Fischer UK, Ganster B, Liska R, Rheinberger V (2008) Benzoyl germanium derivatives as novel visible light photoinitiators for dental materials. Dent Mater 24(7):901–907. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.004
Caldas DB, de Almeida JB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA, Consani S (2003) Influence of curing tip distance on resin composite Knoop hardness number, using three different light curing units. Oper Dent 28(3):315–320
Yearn JA (1985) Factors affecting cure of visible light activated composites. Int Dent J 35(3):218–225
Thome T, Steagall W Jr, Tachibana A, Braga SR, Turbino ML (2007) Influence of the distance of the curing light source and composite shade on hardness of two composites. J Appl Oral Sci: revista FOB 15(6):486–491. doi:10.1590/S1678-77572007000600006
Calheiros FC, Daronch M, Rueggeberg FA, Braga RR (2008) Influence of irradiant energy on degree of conversion, polymerization rate and shrinkage stress in an experimental resin composite system. Dent Mater 24(9):1164–1168. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.006
Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC, Condon JR, Todd R (1997) Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res 76(8):1508–1516. doi:10.1177/00220345970760081401
Ilie N, Hickel R (2007) Quality of curing in relation to hardness, degree of cure and polymerization depth measured on a nano-hybrid composite. Am J Dent 20(4):263–268
Durner J, Obermaier J, Draenert M, Ilie N (2012) Correlation of the degree of conversion with the amount of elutable substances in nano-hybrid dental composites. Dent Mater 28(11):1146–1153. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.006
Aranha AM, Giro EM, Hebling J, Lessa FC, Costa CA (2010) Effects of light-curing time on the cytotoxicity of a restorative composite resin on odontoblast-like cells. J Appl Oral Sci: revista FOB 18(5):461–466. doi:10.1590/S1678-77572010000500006
Akram S, Ali Abidi SY, Ahmed S, Meo AA, Qazi FU (2011) Effect of different irradiation times on microhardness and depth of cure of a nanocomposite resin. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 21(7):411–414. doi:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21777529
Bouschlicher MR, Rueggeberg FA, Wilson BM (2004) Correlation of bottom-to-top surface microhardness and conversion ratios for a variety of resin composite compositions. Oper Dent 29(6):698–704
ISO (2013) Dentistry—polymer-based restorative materials. ISO 4049:2009
Flury S, Hayoz S, Peutzfeldt A, Husler J, Lussi A (2012) Depth of cure of resin composites: is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials? Dent Mater 28(5):521–528. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.002
ISO (2013) Metallic materials—instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parameters—part 1: test method. ISO 14577–1:2002
Musanje L, Darvell BW (2006) Curing-light attenuation in filled-resin restorative materials. Dent Mater 22(9):804–817. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.009
Arikawa H, Kanie T, Fujii K, Takahashi H, Ban S (2007) Effect of filler properties in composite resins on light transmittance characteristics and color. Dent Mater J 26(1):38–44
Fujita K, Ikemi T, Nishiyama N (2011) Effects of particle size of silica filler on polymerization conversion in a light-curing resin composite. Dent Mater 27(11):1079–1085. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.010
Emami N, Sjodahl M, Soderholm KJ (2005) How filler properties, filler fraction, sample thickness and light source affect light attenuation in particulate filled resin composites. Dent Mater 21(8):721–730. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.01.002
Feng L, Suh BI, Shortall AC (2010) Formation of gaps at the filler-resin interface induced by polymerization contraction stress: gaps at the interface. Dent Mater 26(8):719–729. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.004
Hadis MA, Shortall AC, Palin WM (2012) Specimen aspect ratio and light transmission in photoactive dental resins. Dent Mater 28(11):1154–1161. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.010
Shortall AC, Palin WM, Burtscher P (2008) Refractive index mismatch and monomer reactivity influence composite curing depth. J Dent Res 87(1):84–88. doi:10.1177/154405910808700115
Chen YC, Ferracane JL, Prahl SA (2007) Quantum yield of conversion of the photoinitiator camphorquinone. Dent Mater 23(6):655–664. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.005
Guo G, Fan Y, Zhang JF, Hagan JL, Xu X (2012) Novel dental composites reinforced with zirconia-silica ceramic nanofibers. Dent Mater 28(4):360–368. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.006
Braem M, Finger W, Van Doren VE, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1989) Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites. Dent Mater 5(5):346–348
Chung KH, Greener EH (1990) Correlation between degree of conversion, filler concentration and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 17(5):487–494. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb01419.x
Price RB, Felix CA, Andreou P (2004) Effects of resin composite composition and irradiation distance on the performance of curing lights. Biomaterials 25(18):4465–4477. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.032
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bucuta, S., Ilie, N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Invest 18, 1991–2000 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1177-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1177-y