Effect of selective enamel etching on clinical performance of CAD/CAM partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement
- 684 Downloads
This study was conducted to evaluate a self-adhesive resin luting cement [RelyX Unicem 3MESPE–RXU] for luting partial ceramic crowns (PCCs) with and without selective enamel etching in a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Materials and methods
Thirty-four patients had received the intended treatment. Two PCCs (Vita Mark II; Cerec 3D; Sirona) had been placed in a split-mouth design: one with RXU without enamel etching (RXU), the other with RXU with selective enamel etching (RXU + E). Restorations were evaluated at baseline (BL) and after 12, 24, and 36 months (USPHS criteria). For statistical analysis, the Chi-square test was applied (α = 0.05). Clinical survival of all restorations (n = 68) after 3 years was determined using Kaplan–Meier analysis.
Twenty three patients (12 male/11 female) were available for clinical evaluation after 3 years. 19 RXU-PCCs were placed in molars, four in premolars, 18 RXU + E–PCCs in molars, five in premolars. Concerning clinical changes, no significant differences were found between luting strategies RXU/RXU + E at all recalls. Statistically significant changes over time were observed for marginal adaptation and marginal discoloration between BL and 36 m for RXU and RXU + E. For RXU + E, postoperative hypersensitivities decreased significantly from BL (n = 6) to 36 m (n = 0). Of the 68 restorations originally included, eight RXU and four RXU + E restorations failed. At 3 years, Kaplan–Meier survival of RXU was 72.9 %, that of RXU + E 87.6 %. Survival rates were not statistically significant different.
Although clinical survival of RXU + E is slightly better at 3 years, restorations of both groups perform similar with respect to clinical changes over time as evaluated by modified USPHS criteria.
The self-adhesive resin cement RXU can be used in conjunction with selective enamel etching, because survival rates of PCCs in the RXU + E group were not lower but, as a trend, even better than without enamel etching.
KeywordsControlled Prospective clinical study Partial ceramic crowns Clinical evaluation Self-adhesive cement Selective enamel etching
Conflict of interest
- 1.ADA Council on scientific affairs (2003) Tooth-colored restorative materials for posterior teeth. Acceptance program guidelinesGoogle Scholar
- 26.Mörmann WH, Götsch T, Krejci I, Lutz F, Barbakow F (1991) Clinical status of 94 Cerec ceramic inlays after 3 years in situ. In: Mörmann WH (ed) International symposium on computer restorations. The state of the art of the Cerec method (Proceedings). Quintessenz, Berlin, pp 355–363Google Scholar
- 37.Stamatacos C, Simon JF (2013) Cementation of indirect restorations: an overview of resin cements. Compend Contin Educ Dent 34(42–4):46Google Scholar
- 43.Wilson AD, Prosser HJ, Powis DM (1983) Mechanism of adhesion of polyelectrolyte cements to hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 590–592Google Scholar