Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 18, Issue 8, pp 1969–1974 | Cite as

Children's toothbrush contamination in day-care centers: how to solve this problem?

  • Paulo Nelson-FilhoEmail author
  • Maristela Soares Swerts Pereira
  • Andiara De Rossi
  • Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva
  • Késsia Suênia Fidelis de Mesquita
  • Alexandra Mussolino de Queiroz
  • Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the contamination level of toothbrushes by mutans streptococci (MS) and the efficacy of antimicrobial solutions: cetylpyridinium chloride 0.05 % (CPC; Cepacol™) and chlorhexidine 0.12 % (CHX; Periogard™), to disinfect toothbrushes of preschool-aged children in day-care centers.

Material and methods

Fifty-two children were randomly divided into three groups, and a three-stage changeover system was used with a 1-week interval between each stage. Solutions were used by a different group of children in each stage. Children were submitted to a 1 minute brushing without dentifrice, performed by a professional calibrated, followed by random spraying over the bristles of brushes. Process and microbiological analysis were realized, and four brushes of each group were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Results

Friedman's test at 5 % significance level revealed difference between the antimicrobial solutions (p < 0.01). MS were detected in 100 % cases of toothbrushes sprayed with sterile tap water (control) and in 66.7 % after spraying with CPC, but it was not detected formation of colonies/biofilms after spraying with CHX. The data were confirmed by SEM.

Conclusions

The toothbrushes were contaminated with MS after a single brushing.

Clinical relevance

Although CPC has shown good results in comparison with the control, CHX showed greater efficacy in disinfection bristles of toothbrushes.

Keywords

Toothbrushes Disinfection Day-care centers Streptococcus mutans 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Dr. Izabel Yoko Ito (in memoriam) of Department of Clinical Analyses, Toxicology and Bromatology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto and Dr. Marcos Antonio Rossi (in memoriam) of Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo for helpful assistance during microbiological processing and analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Mani SA, Aziz AA, John J, Ismail NM (2010) Knowledge, attitude and practice of oral health promoting factors among caretakers of children attending day-care centers in Kubang Kerian, Malaysia: a preliminary study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 28:78–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scar S (1998) American child care today. Am Psychol 53:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ayşegül O, Elgin IE, Gulcin A, Nedim S (2007) The efficacy of chlorhexidine spray vs mouthwash in the microbial contamination of child toothbrushes. J Dent Child 74:177–181Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glass RT, Jensen HG (1988) More on the contaminated toothbrushes: the viral story. Quintessence Int 19:713–716PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newbrun E (1992) Preventing dental caries: breaking the chain of transmission. J Am Dent Assoc 123:55–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malmberg E, Birkhed D, Norvenius G, Norén JG, Dahlén G (1994) Microorganisms on toothbrushes at day-care centers. Acta Odontol Scand 52:93–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Efstratiou M, Papaionnou W, Nakou M, Ktenas E, Vrotsos IA, Panis V (2007) Contamination of a toothbrush with antibacterial properties by oral microorganisms. J Dent 35:331–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nelson-Filho P, Macari S, Faria G, Assed S, Ito IY (2000) Microbial contamination of toothbrushes and their decontamination. Pediatr Dent 22:381–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karibasappa GN, Nagesh L, Sujatha BK (2011) Assessment of microbial contamination of toothbrush head: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 22:2–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bunetel L, Tricot-Doulex S, Agnani G, Bonnaure-Malletm M (2000) In vitro evaluation of the retention of three different types of toothbrush. Oral Microbiol Immunol 15:313–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nascimento AP, Watanabe E, Ito IY (2010) Toothbrush contamination by Candida spp. and efficacy of mouthrinse spray for their disinfection. Mycopathologia 169:133–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Turner LA, McCombs GB, Hynes WL, Tolle SL (2009) A novel approach to controlling bacterial contamination on toothbrushes: chlorhexidine coating. Int J Dent Hyg 7(4):241–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sato S, Pedrazzi V, Guimarães-Lara EH, Panzeri H, Albuquerque-Júnior RF, Ito YI (2005) Antimicrobial spray for toothbrush disinfection: an in vivo evaluation. Quintessence Int 36:812–816PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nelson-Filho P, Faria G, Silva RA, Rossi MA, Ito IY (2006) Evaluation of the contamination and disinfection methods of toothbrushes used by 24- to 48-month-old children. J Dent Child 73:152–158Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caufield PW, Cutter GR, Dasanayake AP (1993) Initial acquisition of mutans streptococci by infants: evidence for a discrete window of infectivity. J Dent Res 72:37–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tedjosasongko U, Kozai K (2002) Initial acquisition and transmission of mutans streptococci in children at day nursery. J Dent Child 69:284–288Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Köhler B, Bratthall D (1978) Intrafamilial levels of Streptococcus mutans and some aspects of the bacterial transmission. J Dent Res 86:35–42Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davey AL, Rogers AH (1984) Multiple types of the bacterium Streptococcus mutans in the human mouth and their intra-family transmission. Arch Oral Biol 29:453–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saravia ME, Nelson-Filho P, Ito IY, Silva LAB, Silva RAB, Emilson C-G (2011) Morphological differentiation between S. mutans and S. sobrinus on modified SB-20 culture medium. Microbiol Res 166:63–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Quirynen M, De Soete M, Pauwels M, Gizani S, Van Meerbeek B, van Steenberghe D (2003) Can toothpaste or a toothbrush with antibacterial tufts prevent toothbrush contamination? J Periodontol 74:312–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nelson-Filho P, Isper AR, Assed S, Faria G, Ito IY (2004) Effect of triclosan dentifrice on toothbrush contamination. Pediatr Dent 26:11–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jensen B, Bratthall D (1989) A new method for the estimation of mutans streptococci in human saliva. J Dent Res 68:468–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shklair IL, Keene HJ (1974) A biochemical scheme for the separation of the five varieties of Streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol 19:1079–1081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Whittenbury R (1964) Hydrogen peroxide formation and catalase activity in the lactic acid bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 35:13–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saravia ME, Nelson-Filho P, Silva RAB, Faria G, Rossi MA, Ito IY (2008) Viability of Streptococcus mutans toothbrush bristles. J Dent Child 75:29–32Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Balappanavar AY, Nagesh L, Ankola AV, Tangade PS, Kakodkar P, Varun S (2009) Antimicrobial efficacy of various disinfecting solutions in reducing the contamination of the toothbrush — a comparative study. Oral Health Prev Dent 7:137–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kennedy HF, Morrison D, Tomlinson D, Gibson BES, Bagg J, Gemmell CG (2003) Gingivitis and toothbrushes: potential roles in viridans streptococcal bacteraemia. J Infect 46:67–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sullivan A, Wretlind B, Nord E (2003) Will triclosan in toothpaste select for resistant oral streptococci? Clin Microbiol Infect 9:306–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Caudry SD, Klitorinos A, Chan ECS (1995) Contaminated toothbrushes and their disinfection. J Can Dent Assoc 61:511–516PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Giuliana G, Pizzo G, Milici ME, Musotto GC, Giangreco R (1997) In vitro antifungal properties of mouthrinses containing antimicrobial agents. J Periodontol 68:729–733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paulo Nelson-Filho
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maristela Soares Swerts Pereira
    • 2
  • Andiara De Rossi
    • 1
  • Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva
    • 1
  • Késsia Suênia Fidelis de Mesquita
    • 1
  • Alexandra Mussolino de Queiroz
    • 1
  • Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric DentistrySchool of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
  2. 2.Department of PediatricSchool of Dentistry, University José do Rosário VellanoAlfenasBrazil

Personalised recommendations