Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 1205–1212 | Cite as

Therapeutic elastic tape reduces morbidity after wisdom teeth removal—a clinical trial

  • Oliver RistowEmail author
  • Bettina Hohlweg-Majert
  • Stephen R. Stürzenbaum
  • Victoria Kehl
  • Steffen Koerdt
  • Lilian Hahnefeld
  • Christoph Pautke
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

Although the extraction of an impacted third molar (3M) is a routine procedure, postoperative morbidities typically include swelling, pain, and trismus. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the application of kinesiologic tape can improve the postoperative morbidities associated with 3M surgery, thereby improving the postoperative well-being of patients.

Materials and methods

Forty patients assigned for prospective 3M removal were randomized into two treatment groups (with/without kinesiologic tape). Facial swelling was quantified using a five-line measurement at six specific time points. Pain scores were assessed using a visual analog scale, and mouth opening range was assessed by means of standard calipers. In addition, all patients were asked to evaluate overall satisfaction and swelling (both groups) and the effect of the tape on movement and comfort (taped group only).

Results

The postoperational application of kinesiologic tape reduced significantly all investigated parameters: swelling, pain, and trismus. Furthermore, patients with kinesiologic tape reported a significantly lower morbidity rate.

Conclusion

The application of kinesiologic tape following a 3M surgery is a simple and economical, yet medically relevant approach.

Clinical relevance

Kinesiologic tape offers patients a less traumatic postoperational experience and therefore holds promise to enhance the quality of life of a large cohort of the population.

Keywords

Kinesio tape Third molar Swelling Pain Trismus Morbidity, extraction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the K-Active Europe GmbH for the donation of all K-Active Tapes® used in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interests with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Friedman JW (2007) The prophylactic extraction of third molars: a public health hazard. Am J Publ Health 97(9):1554–1559. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.100271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colorado-Bonnin M, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C (2006) Quality of life following lower third molar removal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35(4):343–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.08.008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGrath C, Comfort MB, Lo EC, Luo Y (2003) Changes in life quality following third molar surgery—the immediate postoperative period. Br Dent J 194(5):265–268. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809930, discussion 261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Monaco G, Daprile G, Tavernese L, Corinaldesi G, Marchetti C (2009) Mandibular third molar removal in young patients: an evaluation of 2 different flap designs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 67(1):15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pasqualini D, Cocero N, Castella A, Mela L, Bracco P (2005) Primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a comparative study. IntJ Oral Maxillofac Surg 34(1):52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chukwuneke FN, Oji C, Saheeb DB (2008) A comparative study of the effect of using a rubber drain on postoperative discomfort following lower third molar surgery. IntJ Oral Maxillofac Surg 37(4):341–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.11.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sortino F, Cicciu M (2011) Strategies used to inhibit postoperative swelling following removal of impacted lower third molar. Dental Research Journal 8(4):162–171. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.86031 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carrillo JS, Calatayud J, Manso FJ, Barberia E, Martinez JM, Donado M (1990) A randomized double-blind clinical trial on the effectiveness of helium-neon laser in the prevention of pain, swelling and trismus after removal of impacted third molars. Int Dent J 40(1):31–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greenstein G (2007) Therapeutic efficacy of cold therapy after intraoral surgical procedures: a literature review. J Periodontol 78(5):790–800. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060319 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Szolnoky G, Szendi-Horvath K, Seres L, Boda K, Kemeny L (2007) Manual lymph drainage efficiently reduces postoperative facial swelling and discomfort after removal of impacted third molars. Lymphology 40(3):138–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kase K, Hashimoto T, Tomoki O (1996) Development of kinesio taping perfect manual. Kinesio Taping Association, Tokyo, pp 1–39Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T (2003) Clinical therapeutic applications of the kinesio taping method, 2nd edn. Kinesio Taping Association, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kase K, Stockheimer KR (2006) Kinesio taping for lymphoedema and chronic swelling—Kinesio Taping Manual. Ken Ikai Co. Ltd., Tokyo, pp 1–172Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sijmonsma J, Trompert R, van der Veen T (2010) Lymph taping: theory, technique. Practice. Fysionair V.O.F, Oost, pp 1–44Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rai A, Datarkar A, Borle RM (2011) Are maxillomandibular fixation screws a better option than Erich arch bars in achieving maxillomandibular fixation? A randomized clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(12):3015–3018. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Williams S, Whatman C, Hume PA, Sheerin K (2012) Kinesio taping in treatment and prevention of sports injuries: a meta-analysis of the evidence for its effectiveness. Sports Med 42(2):153–164. doi: 10.2165/11594960-000000000-00000 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sahoo NK, Mohan R (2010) IMF screw: an ideal intermaxillary fixation device during open reduction of mandibular fracture. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 9(2):170–172. doi: 10.1007/s12663-010-0049-0 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luhr HG (1987) Vitallium Luhr systems for reconstructive surgery of the facial skeleton. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 20(3):573–606Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garcia AG, Sampedro FG, Rey JG, Vila PG, Martin MS (2000) Pell–Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(6):585–587. doi: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0535 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leonard MS (1992) Removing third molars: a review for the general practitioner. J Am Dent Assoc 123(2):77–78, 81–82, 85–86Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chou YH, Li SH, Liao SF, Tang HW (2012) Case report: manual lymphatic drainage and kinesio taping in the secondary malignant breast cancer-related lymphedema in an arm with arteriovenous (A-V) fistula for hemodialysis. Am J Hosp Palliat Care (Epub Ahead Of Print). doi: 10.1177/1049909112457010 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsai HJ, Hung HC, Yang JL, Huang CS, Tsauo JY (2009) Could kinesio tape replace the bandage in decongestive lymphatic therapy for breast-cancer-related lymphedema? A pilot study. Support Care Cancer Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer 17(11):1353–1360. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0592-8 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rana M, Gellrich NC, Ghassemi A, Gerressen M, Riediger D, Modabber A (2011) Three-dimensional evaluation of postoperative swelling after third molar surgery using 2 different cooling therapy methods: a randomized observer-blind prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(8):2092–2098. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Markiewicz MR, Brady MF, Ding EL, Dodson TB (2008) Corticosteroids reduce postoperative morbidity after third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 66(9):1881–1894. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim K, Brar P, Jakubowski J, Kaltman S, Lopez E (2009) The use of corticosteroids and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medication for the management of pain and inflammation after third molar surgery: a review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107(5):630–640. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.11.005 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bjorn H, Lundqvist C, Hjelmstrom P (1954) A photogrammetric method of measuring the volume of facial swellings. J Dent Res 33(3):295–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Milles M, Desjardins PJ, Pawel HE (1985) The facial plethysmograph: a new instrument to measure facial swelling volumetrically. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral And Maxillofac Surg 43(5):346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van Gool AV, Ten Bosch JJ, Boering G (1975) A photographic method of assessing swelling following third molar removal. Int J Oral Surg 4(3):121–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gonzalez-Iglesias J, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Cleland JA, Huijbregts P, Del Rosario Gutierrez-Vega M (2009) Short-term effects of cervical kinesio taping on pain and cervical range of motion in patients with acute whiplash injury: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 39(7):515–521. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.3072 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thelen MD, Dauber JA, Stoneman PD (2008) The clinical efficacy of kinesio tape for shoulder pain: a randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 38(7):389–395. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2791 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver Ristow
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Bettina Hohlweg-Majert
    • 1
    • 3
  • Stephen R. Stürzenbaum
    • 4
  • Victoria Kehl
    • 5
  • Steffen Koerdt
    • 2
  • Lilian Hahnefeld
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christoph Pautke
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.Medizin und AesthetikClinic for Oral and Maxillofacial and Plastic SurgeryMunichGermany
  2. 2.University of MunichMunichGermany
  3. 3.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
  4. 4.School of Biomedical SciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  5. 5.Institute of Medical Statistics and EpidemiologyTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
  6. 6.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryUniversity of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations