Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of tin–chloride pretreatment on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the effect on resin composite-to-dentin bond strength of incorporation of an acidic tin–chloride pretreatment in two adhesive systems.

Materials and methods

Human molars were ground to expose mid-coronal dentin. For microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing, dentin was treated with Optibond FL or Clearfil SE according to one of six protocols (n = 22/group). Group 1: Phosphoric acid etching, Optibond FL Prime, Optibond FL Adhesive (manufacturer’s instructions; control); Group 2: Tin–chloride pretreatment, Optibond FL Prime, Optibond FL Adhesive; Group 3: Phosphoric acid etching, tin–chloride pretreatment, Optibond FL Prime, Optibond FL Adhesive; Group 4: Clearfil SE Primer, Clearfil SE Bond (manufacturer’s instructions; control); Group 5: Phosphoric acid etching, Clearfil SE Primer, Clearfil SE Bond; and Group 6: Tin–chloride pretreatment, Clearfil SE Primer, Clearfil SE Bond. The molars were then built up with resin composite (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic). After storage (1 week, 100  % humidity, 37 °C) the μTBS was measured and failure mode was determined. Additionally, pretreated dentin surfaces were evaluated using SEM and EDX. The μTBS results were analyzed statistically by a Welch Two Sample t-test and a Kruskal–Wallis test followed by exact Wilcoxon rank sum tests with Bonferroni–Holm adjustment for multiple testing (α = 0.05).

Results

When Optibond FL was used, partial or total replacement of phosphoric acid with tin–chloride decreased μTBS significantly. In contrast, when Clearfil SE was used, inclusion of a tin–chloride pretreatment in the adhesive procedure increased μTBS significantly.

Conclusions

Tin–chloride pretreatment had a beneficial influence on the bond promoting capacity of the MDP-containing adhesive system Clearfil SE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Loveren C (1990) The antimicrobial action of fluoride and its role in caries inhibition. J Dent Res 69:676–683, Special No

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Loveren C (2001) Antimicrobial activity of fluoride and its in vivo importance: identification of research questions. Caries Res 35(Suppl. 1):65–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller S, Truong T, Heu R, Stranick M, Bouchard D, Gaffar A (1994) Recent advances in stannous fluoride technology: antibacterial efficacy and mechanism of action towards hypersensitivity. Int Dent J 44:83–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Paraskevas S, van der Weijden GA (2006) A review of the effects of stannous fluoride on gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 33:1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganss C, Neutard L, von Hinckeldey J, Kilmek J, Schlueter N (2010) Efficacy of a tin/fluoride rinse: a randomized in situ trial on erosion. J Dent Res 89:1214–1218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganss C, Schlueter N, Hardt M, Schattenberg P, Klimek J (2008) Effect of fluoride compounds on enamel erosion in vitro: a comparison of amine, sodium and stannous fluoride. Caries Res 42:2–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganss C, Lussi A, Sommer N, Klimik J, Schlueter N (2010) Efficacy of fluoride compounds and stannous chloride as erosion inhibitors in dentine. Caries Res 44:248–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ganss C, Lussi A, Grunau O, Klimek J, Schlueter N (2011) Conventional and anti-erosion fluoride toothpastes: effect on enamel erosion and erosion-abrasion. Caries Res 45:581–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huysmans MCDNJM, Jager DHJ, Ruben JL, Unk DEMF, Klijn CPAH, Vieira AM (2011) Reduction of erosive wear in situ by stannous fluoride-containing toothpaste. Caries Res 45:518–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schlueter N, Klimek J, Ganss C (2009) Efficacy of an experimental tin-F-containing solution in erosive tissue loss in enamel and dentine in situ. Caries Res 43:415–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ganss C, Hardt M, Lussi A, Cocks AK, Klimek J, Schlueter N (2010) Mechanism of action of tin-containing fluoride solutions as anti-erosive agents in dentine - an in vitro tin-uptake, tissue loss, and scanning electron microscopy study. Eur J Oral Sci 118:376–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Flury S, Koch T, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A, Ganss C (2013) The effect of a tin-containing fluoride mouth rinse on the bond between resin composite and erosively demineralised dentin. Clin Oral Invest 17:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lussi A (2006) Erosive tooth wear – a multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge. Monogr Oral Sci 20:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tay FR, Sano H, Carvalho R, Pashley EL, Pashley DH (2000) An ultrastructural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhes Dent 2:83–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, de Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B (2006) Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent 34:77–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, de Munck J, van Meerbeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83:454–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van Meerbeek B, de Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B (2005) One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 30:39–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Osaka A, van Meerbeek B (2006) Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 85:941–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoshiraha K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Mine A, Nakamura M, Minagi S, Osaka A, Suzuki K, van Meerbeek B (2010) Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater 6:3573–3582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, Osaka A, van Meerbeek B (2012) Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 91:376–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Torii Y, Itou K, Nishitani Y, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K (2002) Effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to self-etching primer application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 15:305–308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Walker MP, Wang Y, Swafford J, Evans A, Spencer P (2000) Influence of additional acid etch treatment on resin cement dentin infiltration. J Prosthod 9:77–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Gaba International AG, Therwil, Switzerland and Kuraray Europe, Germany for providing the materials needed. Furthermore, we thank J. Wandel and Prof. Dr. J. Hüsler, Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Bern for statistical analyses.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or non-financial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland

    Anne Peutzfeldt, Tamara Koch, Simon Flury & Adrian Lussi

  2. Department of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, Dental Clinic of the Justus Liebig University, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Giessen, Germany

    Carolina Ganss

Authors
  1. Anne Peutzfeldt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tamara Koch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carolina Ganss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Simon Flury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Adrian Lussi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Peutzfeldt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peutzfeldt, A., Koch, T., Ganss, C. et al. Effect of tin–chloride pretreatment on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin. Clin Oral Invest 18, 535–543 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0975-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0975-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation