Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 369–375 | Cite as

Comparison of occlusal loading conditions in a lower second premolar using three-dimensional finite element analysis

  • Stefano Benazzi
  • Ian R. Grosse
  • Giorgio Gruppioni
  • Gerhard W. Weber
  • Ottmar Kullmer
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the patterns of stress distribution in a lower second premolar using three conventional occlusal loadings and two more realistic loading scenarios based on occlusal contact areas.

Materials and methods

The teeth of a dried modern human skull were micro-CT scanned in maximum intercuspation contact with a Viscom X8060 NDT X-ray system. A kinematic analysis of the surface contacts between antagonistic right upper and lower teeth during the power stroke was carried out in the Occlusal Fingerprint Analyser (OFA) software. Stress distribution in the lower right second premolar was analysed using three-dimensional finite element (FE) methods, considering occlusal information taken from OFA results (cases 4–5). The output was compared to that obtained by loading the tooth with a single point force (cases 1–3).

Results

Results for cases 1–3 differ considerable from those of cases 4–5. The latter show that tensile stresses might be concentrated in grooves and fissures of the occlusal surface, in the marginal ridges, in the disto-lingual and in the distal side of the root. Moreover, the premolar experiences high tensile stresses in the buccal aspect of the crown, supporting the idea that abfraction might be a dominant factor in the aetiology of non-carious cervical lesions.

Conclusions

The application of FE methods in dental biomechanics can be advanced considering individual wear patterns.

Clinical relevance

More realistic occlusal loadings are of importance for both new developments in prosthetic dentistry and improvements of materials for tooth restoration, as well to address open questions about the worldwide spread problem of dental failure.

Keywords

Biomechanics Loading conditions Occlusal wear pattern Functional morphology 

References

  1. 1.
    Schwartz GT (2000) Taxonomic and functional aspects of the patterning of enamel thickness distribution in extant large-bodied hominoids. Am J Phys Anthropol 111:221–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spears IR, Crompton RH (1996) The mechanical significance of the occlusal geometry of great ape molars in food breakdown. J Hum Evol 31:517–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spears IR, Macho GA (1998) Biomechanical behaviour of modern human molars: implications for interpreting the fossil record. Am J Phys Anthropol 106:467–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Macho GA, Spears IR (1999) Effects of loading on the biochemical behaviour of molars of Homo, Pan, and Pongo. Am J Phys Anthropol 109:211–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Palamara D, Palamara JEA, Tyas MJ, Messer HH (2000) Strain patterns in cervical enamel of teeth subjected to occlusal loading. Dent Mater 16:412–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fernandes CP, Glantz P-OJ, Svensson SA, Bergmark A (2003) Reflection photoelasticity: a new method for studies of clinical mechanics in prosthetic dentistry. Dent Mater 19:106–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Jager N, de Kler M, van der Zel JM (2006) The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns. Dent Mater 22:234–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiang W, Bo H, YongChun G, LongXing N (2010) Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 103:6–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng YY, Li JY, Fok SL, Cheung WL, Chow TW (2010) 3D FEA of high performance polyethylene fiber reinforced maxillary dentures. Dent Mater 26:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fu G, Deng F, Wang L, Ren A (2010) The three-dimension finite element analysis of stress in posterior tooth residual root restored with postcore crown. Dent Traumatol 26:64–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Every RG (1972) A new terminology for mammalian teeth: founded on the phenomenon of thegosis. Parts 1 and 2. Pegasus, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaidonis JA (2008) Tooth wear: the view of the anthropologist. Clin Oral Invest 12:21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ichim I, Li Q, Loughran J, Swain MV, Kieser J (2007) Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: part I. Modelling of restorative fracture. Dent Mater 23:1553–1561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Palamara JE, Palamara D, Messer HH, Tyas MJ (2006) Tooth morphology and characteristics of non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 34:185–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khani MM, Tafazzoli-Shadpour M, Aghajani F, Naderi P (2009) Mechanical vulnerability of lower second premolar utilising visco-elastic dynamic stress analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 12:553–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eraslan Ö, Eraslan O, Eskitaşcıoğlu G, Belli S (2011) Conservative restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolar teeth: a FEM study. Clin Oral Investig 15:403–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Benazzi S, Kullmer O, Grosse IR, Weber GW (2011) Using occlusal wear information and finite element analysis to investigate stress distributions in human molars. J Anat 219:259–272PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Benazzi S, Kullmer O, Grosse I, Weber G (2012) Brief communication: comparing loading scenarios in lower first molar supporting bone structure using 3D finite element analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 147:128–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kullmer O, Benazzi S, Fiorenza L, Schulz D, Bacso S, Winzen O (2009) Occlusal Fingerprint Analysis (OFA)—quantification of tooth wear pattern. Am J Phys Anthropol 139:600–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kullmer O, Schulz D, Benazzi S (2012) An experimental approach to evaluate the correspondence between wear facet position and occlusal movements. Anat Rec 295:846–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Palamara JEA, Palamara D, Messer HH (2002) Strains in the marginal ridge during occlusal loading. Aust Dent J 47:218–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rees JS (2002) The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. J Oral Rehabil 29:188–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hasegawa A, Shinya A, Nakasone Y, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Shinya A (2010) Development of 3D CAD/FEM analysis system for natural teeth and jaw bone constructed from X-ray CT images. Int J Biomater. doi:10.1155/2010/659802
  24. 24.
    Benazzi S, Kullmer O, Schulz D, Gruppioni G, Weber GW (2013) Individual tooth macrowear pattern guides the reconstruction of Sts 52 (Australopithecus africanus) dental arches. Am J Phys Anthropol 150:324–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kullmer O, Benazzi S, Schulz D, Gunz P, Kordos L, Begun DR (2013) Dental arch restoration using tooth macrowear patterns with application to Rudapithecus hungaricus, from the late Miocene of Rudabánya, Hungary. J Hum Evol 64(2):151–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Benazzi S, Viola B, Kullmer O et al (2011) A reassessment of the Neanderthal teeth from Taddeo cave (southern Italy). J Hum Evol 61:377–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hattori Y, Satoh C, Kunieda T, Endoh R, Hisamatsu H, Watanabe M (2009) Bite forces and their resultants during forceful intercuspation clenching in humans. J Biomech 42:1533–1538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li H, Zhou ZR (2002) Wear behavior of human teeth in dry and artificial saliva conditions. Wear 249:980–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Magne P (2007) Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data. Dent Mater 23:539–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ko CC, Chu CS, Chung KH, Lee MC (1992) Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent 68:421–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rubin C, Krishnamurthy N, Capilouto E, Yi H (1983) Stress analysis of the human tooth using a three-dimensional finite element model. J Dent Res 62:82–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A, Romanowicz M (2007) Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion. J Prosthet Dent 98:89–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Coelho PG, Silva NR, Thompson VP, Rekow D, Zhang G (2009) Effect of proximal wall height on all-ceramic crown core stress distribution: a finite element analysis study. Int J Prosthodont 22:78–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kondo T, Wakabayashi N (2009) Influence of molar support loss on stress and strain in premolar periodontium: a patient-specific FEM study. J Dent 37:541–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Michael JA, Townsend GC, Greenwood LF, Kaidonis JA (2009) Abfraction: separating fact from fiction. Aust Dent J 54:2–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bartlett DW, Shah P (2006) A critical review of non-carious cervical (wear) lesions and the role of abfraction, erosion, and abrasion. J Dent Res 85:306–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Telles D, Pegoraro LF, Pereira JC (2006) Incidence of noncarious cervical lesions and their relation to the presence of wear facets. J Esthet Restor Dent 18:178–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sneed WD (2011) Noncarious cervical lesions: why on the facial? A theory. J Esthet Restor Dent 23:197–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Grippo JO, Simring M, Coleman TA (2012) Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion, and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: a 20-year perspective. J Esthet Restor Dent 24:10–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Grippo JO (1991) Abfractions: a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent 3:14–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Geramy A, Sharafoddin F (2003) Abfraction: 3D analysis by means of the finite element method. Quintessence Int 34:526–533PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rees JS, Hammadeh M (2004) Undermining of enamel as a mechanism of abfraction lesion formation: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 112:347–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Perez Cdos R, Gonzalez MR, Prado NA, de Miranda MS, Macêdo Mde A, Fernandes BM (2012) Restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: when, why, and how. Int J Dent 2012:687058PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Spears IR, van Noort R, Crompton RH, Cardew GE, Howard IC (1993) The effects of enamel anisotropy on the distribution of stress in a tooth. J Dent Res 72:1526–1531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A (2005) Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 94:321–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Boschian Pest L, Guidotti S, Pietrabissa R, Gagliani M (2006) Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Rehabil 33:690–697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pérez-González A, Iserte-Vilar JL, González-Lluch C (2011) Interpreting finite element results for brittle materials in endodontic restorations. Biomed Eng Online 10:44PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fill TS, Toogood RW, Major PW, Carey JP (2012) Analytically determined mechanical properties of, and models for the periodontal ligament: critical review of literature. J Biomech 45:9–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Benazzi
    • 1
  • Ian R. Grosse
    • 2
  • Giorgio Gruppioni
    • 3
  • Gerhard W. Weber
    • 4
  • Ottmar Kullmer
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Human EvolutionMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  3. 3.Department of Cultural HeritageUniversity of BolognaRavennaItaly
  4. 4.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  5. 5.Department of Palaeoanthropology and Messel ResearchSenckenberg Research InstituteFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations