Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to evaluate the adhesion between PEEK and two self-adhesive resin cements after plasma treatment.

Methods

Eight hundred sixty-four polyetheretherketone (PEEK) disks were cut and polished to silicon carbide (SIC) P4000. One half of the specimens were randomly selected and pretreated with plasma, whereas the remaining 432 specimens remained untreated. Subsequently, specimens were randomly allocated to four groups (n = 108/group): Visio.link (Bredent), Signum PEEK Bond (Heraeus Kulzer), Ambarino P60 (Creamed), and a control group without additional treatment. Half of the specimens of each group (n = 54) were then cemented with either RelyX Unicem Automix 2 (3 M ESPE) or with Clearfil SA (Kuraray). All specimens were stored in water for 24 h (37 °C). Afterwards, specimens were divided into three groups (n = 18) for different aging levels: (1) no aging (baseline measurement), (2) thermal aging for 5,000 cycles (5/55 °C), and (3) thermal aging for 10,000 cycles (5/55 °C). Thereafter, shear bond strengths (SBS) were measured, and failure types (adhesive, mixed, and cohesive) were assessed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, four- and one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Scheffé test (p < 0.05).

Results

No adhesion could be established without adhesive pretreatment, irrespectively, whether plasma was applied or not. Also, no bond strength was measured when Ambarino P60 was applied. In contrast, adhesive pretreatment resulted in SBS ranging between 8 and 15 MPa. No significant differences were found between the resin cements used. In general, no cohesive failures were observed. Groups without plasma treatment combined with Visio.link or Signum PEEK Bond showed predominantly mixed failure types. Control groups, plasma treated, or treated using Ambarino P60 groups fractured predominantly adhesively.

Conclusion

The use of methyl methacrylate (MMA)-based adhesives allows bonding between PEEK and self-adhesive resin cements. Plasma treatment has no impact on bond to resin cements.

Clinical Significance

PEEK reconstructions can be cemented using self-adhesive resin cements combined with pretreatment with MMA-based adhesives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tetelman ED, Babbush CA (2008) A new transitional abutment for immediate aestehetics and function. Implant Dent 17:51–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Santing HJ, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Ozcan M (2010) Fracture strength and failure mode of maxillary implant-supported provisional single crowns: a comparison of composite resin crowns fabricated directly over PEEK abutments and solid titanium abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00322.x [epub ahead]

  3. Bayer S, Komor N, Kramer A, Albrecht D, Mericske-Stern R, Enkling N (2011) Retention force of plastic clips on implant bars: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi:10.111/j.1600-0501.2011.02312.x [epub ahead]

  4. Tannous F, Steiner M, Shahin R, Kern M (2012) Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Dent Mater 28:273–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurtz SM, Devine JN (2007) PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 28:4845–4869

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT, Scifert JL, Seim HB 3rd, Turner AS (2006) Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 27:324–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Noiset O, Schneider YJ, Marchand-Brynaert J (2000) Adhesion and growth of CaCo2 cells on surface-modified PEEK substrata. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 11:767–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ohl A, Schröder K, Keller D, Meyer-Plath A, Bienert H, Husen B, Rune GM (1999) Chemical micropatterning of polymeric cell culture substrates using low-pressure hydrogen gas discharge plasmas. J Mater Sci Mater Med 10:747–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hammerle CH, Fischer J (2010) Effect of different surface pretreatment and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater 26:553–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallmann L, Mehl A, Sereno N, Hämmerle CHF (2012) The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through different pretreatments. Appl Surf Sci 258:7213–7218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wegner SM, Gerdes W, Kern M (2012) Effect of different artificial aging conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 15:267–272

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kern M (2009) Resin bonding to oxide ceramics for dental restorations. J Adhes Sci Technol 23:1097–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B (2009) Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 88:817–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang B, Barloi A, Kern M (2010) Influence of air-abrasion on zirconia ceramic bonding using an adhesive composite resin. Dent Mater 26:44–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liston EM (1989) Plasma treatment for improved bonding: a review. J Adhes 30:199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schroder K, Meyer-Plath A, Keller D, Ohl A (2002) On the applicability of plasma assisted chemical micropatterning to different polymeric biomaterials. Plasmas and Polymers 7:103–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Briem D, Strametz S, Schroder K, Meenen NM, Lehmann W, Linhart W, Ohl A, Rueger JM (2005) Response of primary fibroblasts and osteoblasts to plasma treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surfaces. J Mater Sci Mater Med 16:671–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yavirach P, Chaijareenont P, Boonyawan D, Pattamapun K, Tunma S, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M (2009) Effects of plasma treatment on the shear bond strength between fiber-reinforced composite posts and resin composite for core buildup. Dent Mater J 28:686–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grace JM, Gerenser LJ (2003) Plasma treatment of polymers. J Dispersion Sci Technol 24:305–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Comyn J, Mascia L, Xiao G, Parker BM (1996) Plasma-treatment of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for adhesive bonding. Int J Adhes 16:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zeiler T (1997) Oberflächenmodifizierung von thermoplastischen Polymerwerkstoffen in Hinblick auf die Verbesserung ihrer Verklebbarkeit. Thesis Erlangen

  22. Sabatini C, Patel M, D’Silva E (2012) In Vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates. Oper Dent epub ahead

  23. Pröbster L, Maiwald U, Weber H (1996) Three-point bending strength of ceramics fused to cast titanium. European J Oral Sci 104:313–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leibrock H, Degenhart M, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G (1999) In vitro study on the effect of thermo-and load-cycling on the bond strength of porcelain repair systems. J Oral Rehabil 26:130–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hancox NL (1998) Thermal effect on polymer matrix composites: part 1. Thermal cycling. Mater Design 19:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Holderegger C, Sailer I, Schuhmacher C, Schlapfer R, Hammerle C, Fischer J (2008) Shear bond strength of resin cements to human dentin. Dent Mater 24:944–950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Ferrari M, Osorio R (2012) Effect of thermal cycling on the bond strength of self-adhesive cements to fiber posts. Clin Oral Investig 16:909–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Torstenson B, Brannstrom M (1988) Contraction gap under composite resin restorations: effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. Oper Dent 13:24–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Mrs Gisela Dachs, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany, for performing the scanning electron microscopy. Special thanks go to Heraeus Kulzer, Kuraray, Bredent, 3 M ESPE and Creamed for supporting this study with materials.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Stawarczyk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stawarczyk, B., Bähr, N., Beuer, F. et al. Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Invest 18, 163–170 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0966-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0966-7

Keywords

Navigation