Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Expression of growth factors during the healing process of alveolar ridge augmentation procedures using autogenous bone grafts in combination with GTR and an anorganic bovine bone substitute

An immunohistochemical study in the sheep

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the expression of various immunohistochemical growth factors and vascularization markers in augmentation on the mandible comparing onlay bone grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR).

Materials and methods

Using a sheep in vivo model, autogenous bone grafts were harvested from the iliac crest. A combination of a resorbable collagen membrane (CM) and a Deproteinized Bovine Bone Material (DBBM) was performed. This modification of the host side was compared with an onlay bone graft control group. Expression of different vascularization markers was compared between these groups.

Results

The expression of revascularization markers was significantly higher within the modification of the host side using GBR and DBBM. Regarding different graft regions, a significantly higher expression within the bone graft using GBR and DBBM could be observed in staining on bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) (5.75 vs. 3.55), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (3.08 vs. 1.64), VEGF Receptor 1 (VEGFR-1) and VEGF Receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) (4.88 vs. 2.24 and 5.06 vs. 2.74), and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (5.29 vs. 3.28 and 5.22 vs. 3.09; p = 0.000, all others p < 0.05), whereas the control group showed a higher rate of resorption during the surveillance period until euthanasia of sheep after 16 weeks.

Conclusion

The use of GBR and DBBM in the transplantation process of autogenous bone grafts compared with the therapeutical use of certain growth factors may enhance vascularization and lower atrophy and resorption.

Clinical relevance

The use of a combination of GBR and DBBM in augmentation procedures on the mandible shows less resorption than simple onlay bone grafts and seems to be superior in a clinical use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hjorting-Hansen E (2002) Bone grafting to the jaws with special reference to reconstructive preprosthetic surgery. A historical review Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 6(1):6–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jakse N, Seibert FJ, Lorenzoni M, Eskici A, Pertl C (2001) A modified technique of harvesting tibial cancellous bone and its use for sinus grafting. Clin Oral Implants Res 12(5):488–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nkenke E, Schultze-Mosgau S, Radespiel-Troger M, Kloss F, Neukam FW (2001) Morbidity of harvesting of chin grafts: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 12(5):495–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nkenke E, Weisbach V, Winckler E, Kessler P, Schultze-Mosgau S, Wiltfang J, Neukam FW (2004) Morbidity of harvesting of bone grafts from the iliac crest for preprosthetic augmentation procedures: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33(2):157–163. doi:10.1054/ijom.2003.0465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nkenke E, Radespiel-Troger M, Wiltfang J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Winkler G, Neukam FW (2002) Morbidity of harvesting of retromolar bone grafts: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 13(5):514–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bauer TW, Muschler GF (2000) Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:10–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan SN, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM (2005) The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13(1):77–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adeyemo WL, Reuther T, Bloch W, Korkmaz Y, Fischer JH, Zoller JE, Kuebler AC (2008) Influence of host periosteum and recipient bed perforation on the healing of onlay mandibular bone graft: an experimental pilot study in the sheep. Oral Maxillofac Surg 12(1):19–28. doi:10.1007/s10006-008-0098-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Adeyemo WL, Reuther T, Bloch W, Korkmaz Y, Fischer JH, Zoller JE, Kuebler AC (2008) Healing of onlay mandibular bone grafts covered with collagen membrane or bovine bone substitutes: a microscopical and immunohistochemical study in the sheep. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37(7):651–659. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2008.02.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maiorana C, Beretta M, Salina S, Santoro F (2005) Reduction of autogenous bone graft resorption by means of Bio-Oss coverage: a prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 25(1):19–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Carvalho PS, Vasconcellos LW, Pi J (2000) Influence of bed preparation on the incorporation of autogenous bone grafts: a study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15(4):565–570

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Tonetti M, Karring T (2005) Long-term stability of autogenous bone grafts following combined application with guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 16(2):133–139. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01104.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin KY, Bartlett SP, Yaremchuk MJ, Fallon M, Grossman RF, Whitaker LA (1990) The effect of rigid fixation on the survival of onlay bone grafts: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86(3):449–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jardini MA, De Marco AC, Lima LA (2005) Early healing pattern of autogenous bone grafts with and without e-PTFE membranes: a histomorphometric study in rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 100(6):666–673. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.03.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karring T, Nyman S, Gottlow J (2000) Laurell L (1993) Development of the biological concept of guided tissue regeneration—animal and human studies. Periodontol 1:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahlin C, Alberius P, Linde A (1991) Osteopromotion for cranioplasty. An experimental study in rats using a membrane technique J Neurosurg 74(3):487–491. doi:10.3171/jns.1991.74.3.0487

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jovanovic SA, Spiekermann H, Richter EJ (1992) Bone regeneration around titanium dental implants in dehisced defect sites: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 7(2):233–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kostopoulos L, Karring T (1994) Guided bone regeneration in mandibular defects in rats using a bioresorbable polymer. Clin Oral Implants Res 5(2):66–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lundgren D, Lundgren AK, Sennerby L, Nyman S (1995) Augmentation of intramembraneous bone beyond the skeletal envelope using an occlusive titanium barrier. An experimental study in the rabbit Clin Oral Implants Res 6(2):67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Simion M, Trisi P, Piattelli A (1994) Vertical ridge augmentation using a membrane technique associated with osseointegrated implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 14(6):496–511

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Araujo MG, Sonohara M, Hayacibara R, Cardaropoli G, Lindhe J (2002) Lateral ridge augmentation by the use of grafts comprised of autologous bone or a biomaterial. An experiment in the dog J Clin Periodontol 29(12):1122–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guillemin G, Patat JL, Fournie J, Chetail M (1987) The use of coral as a bone graft substitute. J Biomed Mater Res 21(5):557–567. doi:10.1002/jbm.820210503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Holmes RE (1979) Bone regeneration within a coralline hydroxyapatite implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 63(5):626–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Galindo-Moreno P, Avila G, Fernandez-Barbero JE, Aguilar M, Sanchez-Fernandez E, Cutando A, Wang HL (2007) Evaluation of sinus floor elevation using a composite bone graft mixture. Clin Oral Implants Res 18(3):376–382. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01337.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S (2002) A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17(5):635–643

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Remmele W, Schicketanz KH (1993) Immunohistochemical determination of estrogen and progesterone receptor content in human breast cancer. Computer-assisted image analysis (QIC score) vs. subjective grading (IRS). Pathol Res Pract 189(8):862–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Marco AC, Jardini MA, Lima LP (2005) Revascularization of autogenous block grafts with or without an e-PTFE membrane. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20(6):867–874

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dongieux JW, Block MS, Morris G, Gardiner D, Dean K (1998) The effect of different membranes on onlay bone graft success in the dog mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 86(2):145–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Karring T (2002) Augmentation of the rat jaw with autogeneic cortico-cancellous bone grafts and guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 13(2):192–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Karring T (2002) Alveolar ridge augmentation by combining autogenous mandibular bone grafts and non-resorbable membranes. Clin Oral Implants Res 13(2):185–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Karring T (2002) Alveolar ridge augmentation using a resorbable copolymer membrane and autogenous bone grafts. An experimental study in the rat Clin Oral Implants Res 13(2):203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fonseca RJ, Clark PJ, Burkes EJ Jr, Baker RD (1980) Revascularization and healing of onlay particulate autologous bone grafts in primates. J Oral Surg 38(8):572–577

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Verhoeven JW, Ruijter J, Cune MS, Terlou M, Zoon M (2000) Onlay grafts in combination with endosseous implants in severe mandibular atrophy: one year results of a prospective, quantitative radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res 11(6):583–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Enneking WF, Burchardt H, Puhl JJ, Piotrowski G (1975) Physical and biological aspects of repair in dog cortical-bone transplants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57(2):237–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith JD, Abramson M (1974) Membranous vs. endochondrial bone autografts. Arch Otolaryngol 99(3):203–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zins JE, Whitaker LA (1983) Membranous versus endochondral bone: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 72(6):778–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Iizuka T, Smolka W, Hallermann W, Mericske-Stern R (2004) Extensive augmentation of the alveolar ridge using autogenous calvarial split bone grafts for dental rehabilitation. Clin Oral Implants Res 15(5):607–615. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01043.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Alberius P, Dahlin C, Linde A (1992) Role of osteopromotion in experimental bone grafting to the skull: a study in adult rats using a membrane technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(8):829–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jensen OT, Greer RO Jr, Johnson L, Kassebaum D (1995) Vertical guided bone-graft augmentation in a new canine mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10(3):335–344

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lundgren AK, Lundgren D, Sennerby L, Taylor A, Gottlow J, Nyman S (1997) Augmentation of skull bone using a bioresorbable barrier supported by autologous bone grafts. An intra-individual study in the rabbit Clin Oral Implants Res 8(2):90–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Karring T (2002) Augmentation of the mandible with GTR and onlay cortical bone grafting. An experimental study in the rat Clin Oral Implants Res 13(2):175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hardwick R, Hayes BK, Flynn C (1995) Devices for dentoalveolar regeneration: an up-to-date literature review. J Periodontol 66(6):495–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. von Arx T, Broggini N, Jensen SS, Bornstein MM, Schenk RK, Buser D (2005) Membrane durability and tissue response of different bioresorbable barrier membranes: a histologic study in the rabbit calvarium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20(6):843–853

    Google Scholar 

  44. Carinci F, Piattelli A, Degidi M, Palmieri A, Perrotti V, Scapoli L, Martinelli M, Laino G, Pezzetti F (2006) Genetic effects of anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) on osteoblast-like MG63 cells. Arch Oral Biol 51(2):154–163. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ferrara N, Carver-Moore K, Chen H, Dowd M, Lu L, O'Shea KS, Powell-Braxton L, Hillan KJ, Moore MW (1996) Heterozygous embryonic lethality induced by targeted inactivation of the VEGF gene. Nature 380(6573):439–442. doi:10.1038/380439a0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang R, Thomas GR, Bunting S, Ko A, Ferrara N, Keyt B, Ross J, Jin H (1996) Effects of vascular endothelial growth factor on hemodynamics and cardiac performance. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 27(6):838–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Street J, Bao M, deGuzman L, Bunting S, Peale FV Jr, Ferrara N, Steinmetz H, Hoeffel J, Cleland JL, Daugherty A, van Bruggen N, Redmond HP, Carano RA, Filvaroff EH (2002) Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates bone repair by promoting angiogenesis and bone turnover. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(15):9656–9661. doi:10.1073/pnas.152324099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ohtsubo S, Matsuda M, Takekawa M (2003) Angiogenesis after sintered bone implantation in rat parietal bone. Histol Histopathol 18(1):153–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Caballero-Alias AM, Loveridge N, Lyon A, Das-Gupta V, Pitsillides A, Reeve J (2004) NOS isoforms in adult human osteocytes: multiple pathways of NO regulation? Calcif Tissue Int 75(1):78–84. doi:10.1007/s00223-003-0161-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Corbett SA, Hukkanen M, Batten J, McCarthy ID, Polak JM, Hughes SP (1999) Nitric oxide in fracture repair. Differential localisation, expression and activity of nitric oxide synthases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(3):531–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Korkmaz Y, Baumann MA, Schroder H, Behrends S, Addicks K, Raab WH, Bloch W (2004) Localization of the NO-cGMP signaling pathway molecules, NOS III-phosphorylation sites, ERK1/2, and Akt/PKB in osteoclasts. J Periodontol 75(8):1119–1125. doi:10.1902/jop.2004.75.8.1119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant of Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Germany.

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Koerdt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koerdt, S., Ristow, O., Wannhoff, A. et al. Expression of growth factors during the healing process of alveolar ridge augmentation procedures using autogenous bone grafts in combination with GTR and an anorganic bovine bone substitute. Clin Oral Invest 18, 179–188 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0938-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0938-y

Keywords

Navigation