Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Insufficient diagnostic accuracy of a single-item questionnaire to detect psychosocial distress in temporomandibular disorder patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Psychosocial assessment needs to be integrated into the diagnosis of chronic pain conditions; however, it is not clear how this assessment should be performed with minimal patient and health care provider burden. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a single-item questionnaire to detect psychosocial distress in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients.

Methods

Presence of psychosocial distress was measured in 126 TMD patients using Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD Axis II measures (depression, somatization, dysfunctional chronic pain). A newly developed single-item questionnaire served as a test to detect psychosocial distress. The association between the presence of distress and test results was analyzed using generalized linear models (GLM). Diagnostic accuracy of the one-item test was assessed.

Results

The GLM revealed a statistically significant association between the presence of psychosocial distress and a positive test result (p < 0.001). Psychosocially distressed patients were 70 % more likely to indicate psychosocial distress in the single-item questionnaire than patients without distress. However, diagnostic test accuracy of the single-item questionnaire was low (sensitivity 73.0 %, specificity 55.7 %). The resulting positive likelihood ratio (1.65) indicated that the single-item test is an inadequate measure for detecting psychosocial distress.

Conclusions

The single-item questionnaire was not sufficiently accurate for detecting TMD patients’ psychosocial distress and may therefore not be useful as an assessment tool for the various dimensions of psychosocial distress in TMD patients.

Clinical relevance

Health care providers should not trust in TMD patients’ responses to a single question regarding psychosocial distress. Nevertheless, this questionnaire may constitute a first step into a more profound patient–provider communication on psychological issues relevant to TMD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Westman A, Linton SJ, Ohrvik J, Wahlen P, Leppert J (2008) Do psychosocial factors predict disability and health at a 3-year follow-up for patients with non-acute musculoskeletal pain? A validation of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Eur J Pain 12:641–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reissmann DR, John MT, Wassell RW, Hinz A (2008) Psychosocial profiles of diagnostic subgroups of temporomandibular disorder patients. Eur J Oral Sci 116:237–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tversky J, Reade PC, Gerschman JA, Holwill BJ, Wright J (1991) Role of depressive illness in the outcome of treatment of temporomandibular joint pain-dysfunction syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 71:696–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCreary CP, Clark GT, Oakley ME, Flack V (1992) Predicting response to treatment for temporomandibular disorders. J Craniomandib Disord 6:161–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yap AU, Chua EK, Tan KB, Chan YH (2004) Relationships between depression/somatization and self-reports of pain and disability. J Orofac Pain 18:220–225

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yap AU, Chua EK, Dworkin SF, Tan HH, Tan KB (2002) Multiple pains and psychosocial functioning/psychologic distress in TMD patients. Int J Prosthodont 15:461–466

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scherer M, Himmel W, Stanske B et al (2007) Psychological distress in primary care patients with heart failure: a longitudinal study. Br J Gen Pract 57:801–807

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Demertzis KH, Craske MG (2006) Anxiety in primary care. Curr Psychiatry Rep 8:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fink P, Sorensen L, Engberg M, Holm M, Munk-Jorgensen P (1999) Somatization in primary care. Prevalence, health care utilization, and general practitioner recognition. Psychosomatics 40:330–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nordstrom A, Bodlund O (2008) Every third patient in primary care suffers from depression, anxiety or alcohol problems. Nord J Psychiatry 62:250–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fink P, Jensen J, Borgquist L et al (1995) Psychiatric morbidity in primary public health care: a Nordic multicentre investigation. Part I: method and prevalence of psychiatric morbidity. Acta Psychiatr Scand 92:409–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Becker SM (2004) Detection of somatization and depression in primary care in Saudi Arabia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39:962–966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eisenberg L (1992) Treating depression and anxiety in primary care. Closing the gap between knowledge and practice. N Engl J Med 326:1080–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Higgins ES (1994) A review of unrecognized mental illness in primary care. Prevalence, natural history, and efforts to change the course. Arch Fam Med 3:908–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L (1973) SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale—preliminary report. Psychopharmacol Bull 9:13–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Beck AT, Steer RA (1987) Beck depression inventory—manual. The Psychological Association, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB (2001) The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 16:606–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF (1992) Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 50:133–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Linton SJ, Hallden K (1998) Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain 14:209–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M et al (2008) A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Rheum 59:632–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Main CJ, Wood PL, Hollis S, Spanswick CC, Waddell G (1992) The Distress and Risk Assessment Method. A simple patient classification to identify distress and evaluate the risk of poor outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Apeldoorn AT, Bosselaar H, Ostelo RW et al (2012) Identification of patients with chronic low back pain who might benefit from additional psychological assessment. Clin J Pain 28:23–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Löwe B, Kroenke K, Grafe K (2005) Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2). J Psychosom Res 58:163–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kriston L, Holzel L, Weiser AK, Berner MM, Harter M (2008) Meta-analysis: are 3 questions enough to detect unhealthy alcohol use? Ann Intern Med 149:879–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bowling A (2005) Just one question: If one question works, why ask several? J Epidemiol Community Health 59:342–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cunny KA, Perri M 3rd (1991) Single-item vs multiple-item measures of health-related quality of life. Psychol Rep 69:127–130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mitchell AJ (2007) Pooled results from 38 analyses of the accuracy of distress thermometer and other ultra-short methods of detecting cancer-related mood disorders. J Clin Oncol 25:4670–4681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Milton K, Bull FC, Bauman A (2011) Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure. Br J Sports Med 45:203–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kriston L, Gunzler C, Rohde A, Berner MM (2010) Is one question enough to detect female sexual dysfunctions? A diagnostic accuracy study in 6,194 women. J Sex Med 7:1831–1841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cook C, Cleland J, Huijbregts P (2007) Creation and critique of studies of diagnostic accuracy: use of the STARD and QUADAS methodological quality assessment tools. J Man Manip Ther 15:93–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. John MT, Hirsch C, Reiber T, Dworkin S (2006) Translating the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders into German: evaluation of content and process. J Orofac Pain 20:43–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dworkin SF, LeResche L (1992) Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 6:301–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kröner-Herwig B, Denecke H, Glier B et al (1996) Qualitätssicherung in der Therapie chronischen Schmerzes. Ergebnisse einer Arbeitsgruppe der Deutschen Gesellschaft zum Studium des Schmerzes (DGSS) zur psychologischen Diagnostik. IX. Multidimensionale Verfahren zur Erfassung schmerzrelevanter Aspekte und Empfehlungen zur Standarddiagnostik. Schmerz 10:47–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hautzinger M, Bailer M (1995) Allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS). Beltz, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  35. Radloff L (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1:385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Von Zerssen D (1976) Die Beschwerden-Liste. Beltz, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dworkin SF, Sherman J, Mancl L, Ohrbach R, LeResche L, Truelove E (2002) Reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II Scales: depression, non-specific physical symptoms, and graded chronic pain. J Orofac Pain 16:207–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. John MT, Zwijnenburg AJ (2001) Interobserver variability in assessment of signs of TMD. Int J Prosthodont 14:265–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schmitter M, Ohlmann B, John MT, Hirsch C, Rammelsberg P (2005) Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: a calibration and reliability study. Cranio 23:212–218

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2004) Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ 329:168–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McGee S (2002) Simlipfying likelihood ratios. J Gen Intern Med 17:647–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL (1994) User's guide to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? J Am Med Assoc 271:703–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kirmayer LJ, Robbins JM (1996) Patients who somatize in primary care: a longitudinal study of cognitive and social characteristics. Psychol Med 26:937–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gatchel RJ (2004) Psychosocial factors that can influence the self-assessment of function. J Occup Rehabil 14:197–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hayward P, Bright JA (1997) Stigma and mental illness: a review and critique. J Ment Health 6:345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Barney LJ, Griffiths KM, Jorm AF, Christensen H (2006) Stigma about depression and its impact on help-seeking intentions. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 40:51–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lobbezoo F, van Selms MK, John MT et al (2005) Use of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders for multinational research: translation efforts and reliability assessments in The Netherlands. J Orofac Pain 19:301–308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wolf E, Petersson K, Petersson A, Nilner M (2001) Long-lasting orofacial pain—a study of 109 consecutive patients referred to a pain group. Swed Dent J 25:129–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Manfredini D, Borella L, Favero L, Ferronato G, Guarda-Nardini L (2010) Chronic pain severity and depression/somatization levels in TMD patients. Int J Prosthodont 23:529–534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Yap AU, Tan KB, Chua EK, Tan HH (2002) Depression and somatization in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent 88:479–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pandey M, Devi N, Thomas BC, Kumar SV, Krishnan R, Ramdas K (2007) Distress overlaps with anxiety and depression in patients with head and neck cancer. Psychooncology 16:582–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Weissman MM, Sholomskas D, Pottenger M, Prusoff BA, Locke BZ (1977) Assessing depressive symptoms in five psychiatric populations: a validation study. Am J Epidemiol 106:203–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wool CA, Barsky AJ (1994) Do women somatize more than men? Gender differences in somatization. Psychosomatics 35:445–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. John MT, Selle D (1998) Assessment of personality traits in patients with craniomandibular disorders. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 8:547–550

    Google Scholar 

  55. Löwe B, Wahl I, Rose M et al (2010) A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population. J Affect Disord 122:86–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Linda S. Raab and Leesa Morrow for the editorial assistance and Annett Schrock for the data management.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel R. Reissmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reissmann, D.R., John, M.T., Kriston, L. et al. Insufficient diagnostic accuracy of a single-item questionnaire to detect psychosocial distress in temporomandibular disorder patients. Clin Oral Invest 17, 1937–1945 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0892-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0892-0

Keywords

Navigation