Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of seating forces on cement–ceramic adhesion in microtensile bond tests

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different seating forces during cementation in cement–ceramic microtensile bond strength (μTBS).

Materials and methods

Forty-five blocks (5 × 5 × 4 mm3) of a glass-infiltrated alumina-based ceramic (In-Ceram Alumina) were fabricated according to the manufacturer’s instructions and duplicated in resin composite. Ceramic surfaces were polished, cleaned for 10 min in an ultrasonic bath, silica coated using a laboratory type of air abrasion device, and silanized. Each treated ceramic block was then randomly assigned to five groups (n = 9) and cemented to a composite block under five seating forces (10 g, 50 g, 100 g, 500 g, and 750 g) using a dual-cured resin cement (Panavia F). The ceramic–cement–composite assemblies were cut under coolant water to obtain bar specimens (1 mm × 0.8 mm2). The μTBS tests were performed in a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). The mean bond strengths values were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA (α ≤ 0.05).

Results

Different seating forces resulted in no significant difference in the μTBS results ranging between 13.1 ± 4.7 and 18.8 ± 2.1 MPa (p = 0.13) and no significant differences among cement thickness.

Conclusions

Excessive seating forces during cementation seem not to affect the μTBS results.

Clinical relevance

Excessive forces during the seating of single all-ceramic restorations cementation seem to display the same tensile bond strength to the resin cement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Hooshmand T, van Noort R, Keshvad A (2002) Bond durability of the resin-bonded and silane treated ceramic surface. Dent Mater 18:179–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Awliya W, Oden A, Yaman P, Dennison JP, Razzoog ME (1998) Shear bond strength of a resin cemented to densely sintered high-purity alumina with various surface conditions. Acta Odontol Scand 56:9–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kern M, Thompson VP (1995) Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 73:240–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadoun M, Asmussen E (1994) Bonding of resin cements to an aluminous ceramic: a new surface treatment. Dent Mater 10:185–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Özcan M, Alkumuru HN, Gemalmaz D (2001) The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 14:335–339

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leevailoj C, Platt JA, Cochran MA, Moore BK (1998) In vitro study of fracture incidence and compressive fracture load of all-ceramic crowns cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer and other luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 80:699–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amaral R, Özcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF (2006) Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 22:283–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Noack MJ, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Roulet JF, Vanherle G (1992) Marginal adaptation of four tooth-coloured inlay systems in vivo. J Dent 20:18–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen EK, Asmussen E (1993) Correlation between depth of cure and surface hardness of a light-activated resin. Scand J Dent Res 101:62–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL (1993) True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determined with a linometer. Dent Mater 9:11–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Magne P, Versluis A, Douglas WH (1999) Effect of luting composite shrinkage and thermal loads on the stress distribution in porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 81:335–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Watts DC, Kisumbi BK, Toworfe GK (2000) Dimensional changes of resin/ionomer restoratives in aqueous and neutral media. Dent Mater 16:89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Geurtsen W (1990) Crown and restoration margins. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 45:380–386

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jager N, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ (2005) Finite element analysis model to simulate the behavior of luting cements during setting. Dent Mater 21:1025–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koyano E, Iwaku M, Fusayama T (1978) Pressuring techniques and cement thickness for cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 40:544–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ken T, Ibbetson R (1996) The effect of cement volume on crown seating. Int J Prosthodont 9:445–451

    Google Scholar 

  17. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1989) Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 68:48–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Amaral R, Özcan M, Valandro L, Valducci I, Bottino MA (2008) Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 85:1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Özcan M, Vallittu K (2003) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 19:725–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Black S, Amoore JN (1993) Measurement of forces applied during the clinical cementation of dental crowns. Physiol Meas 14:387–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuhl MA (1997) A final cementation technique. J Am Dent Assoc 128:1286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang C-J, Millstein PL, Nathanson D (1992) Effects of cement, cement space, marginal design, seating aid materials, and seating force on crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent 67:786–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore JA, Barghi N, Brukl CE, Kaiser DA (1985) Marginal distortion of cast restorations induced by cementation. J Prosthet Dent 54:336–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zortuk M, Bolpaca P, Kilic K, Ozdemir E, Aguloglu S (2010) Effects of finger pressure applied by dentists during cementation of all-ceramic crowns. Eur J Dent 4:383–388

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wylie SG, Wilson PR (1994) An investigation into the pressure transmitted to the pulp chamber on crown cementation: a laboratory study. J Dent Res 73:1684–1689

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wong RH, Wilson PR (1997) The effect of seating force and die spacing on pulpward cementation pressure transmission: a laboratory study. Int Dent J 47:45–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Humplink AJ, Wilson PR (2001) The effect of oscillation and low seating force on pulpward pressure transmission and seating during crown cementation. A laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 14:53–57

    Google Scholar 

  28. Della Bona A, van Noort R (1995) Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 74:1591–1596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Quinn JB, Quinn GD, Kelly JR, Scherrer SS (2005) Fractographic analyses of three ceramic whole crown restoration failures. Dent Mater 21:920–929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jorgensen KD (1960) Factors affecting the film thickness of zinc phosphate cements. Acta Odontol Scand 18:479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chieffi N, Chersoni S, Papacchini F, Vano M, Goracci C, Davidson CL, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2007) The effect of application sustained seating pressure on adhesive luting procedure. Dent Mater 23:159–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kramer N, Frankenberger R (2000) Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting composites. Oper Dent 25:466–472

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS (1996) Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 12:245–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sindel J, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A (1999) Crack formation of all ceramic crowns dependent on different core build-up and luting materials. J Dent 27:175–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Federlin M, Schmidt S, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmaltz G (2004) Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation. Oper Dent 29:560–570

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rekow ED, Harsono M, Janal M, Thompson VP, Zhang G (2006) Factorial analysis of variables influencing stress in all-ceramic crowns. Dent Mater 22:125–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

S.M.S.M. acknowledges a fellow from CAPES/CNPq - IEL Nacional - Brazil.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University—UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil

    Susana María Salazar Marocho, Regina Amaral & Marco Antonio Bottino

  2. Dental Materials Unit, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Mutlu Özcan

  3. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil

    Luiz Felipe Valandro

Authors
  1. Susana María Salazar Marocho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mutlu Özcan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Regina Amaral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luiz Felipe Valandro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marco Antonio Bottino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susana María Salazar Marocho.

Additional information

This paper was presented at the 85th IADR General Session, July 2008, Toronto, Canada, as a poster presentation, entitled: “Effect of pressure on cement-–ceramic adhesion in microtensile bond tests”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marocho, S.M.S., Özcan, M., Amaral, R. et al. Effect of seating forces on cement–ceramic adhesion in microtensile bond tests. Clin Oral Invest 17, 325–331 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0668-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0668-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation