Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical use of an epinephrine-reduced (1/400,000) articaine solution in short-time dental routine treatments—a multicenter study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The addition of epinephrine in dental local anaesthesia results in a longer and deeper anaesthesia under almost ischemic conditions. For short-time dental treatments, epinephrine-reduced anaesthetics may offer shorter and more individual anaesthesia with reduced potential side effects. The aim of this study was a clinical evaluation of anaesthetic potency and adverse effects of an epinephrine-reduced articaine formulation in dental patients undergoing short-time routine treatment. In a prospective clinical, not interventional, study between January 2008 and February 2009, 908 patients undergoing short-time dental treatment in five medical centers were anaesthetized with 4% articaine 1:400,000 epinephrine (Ubistesin™, 3M/ESPE, Seefeld, Germany). Efficacy and safety in clinical use were evaluated. A follow-up after 1 day was conducted by telephone survey. A mean amount of 1.3-ml anaesthetic solution was needed to achieve a complete or sufficient anaesthesia in 97% (n = 876) of cases. A second injection had to be done in 3.7% (n = 34) before and in 11.9% (n = 108) during treatment. Here, the second injection had to be applied after a mean of 48.6 min. The mean duration of soft tissue anaesthesia after infiltration was 146.6 min, after nerve block 187.7 min. The painful treatment took a mean of 50.2 min and the total treatment time summed up to 68.8 min. In 1.7% cases (n = 15), unwanted side effects were observed. The results indicate that a lower concentration of epinephrine in combination with the 4% articaine solution leads to a high success rate of efficacy. The clinical use of a 4% articaine 1:400,000 epinephrine solution can be stated as safe and effective in short dental routine treatments. Reconsiderations concerning limitations of indication or additional contraindications are not necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meechan JG (2009) Pain control in local analgesia. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 10(2):71–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stabholz A, Peretz B (1999) Dental anxiety among patients prior to different dental treatments. Int Dent J 49:90–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oliveira PC, Volpato MC, Ramacciato JC, Ranali J (2004) Articaine and lignocaine efficiency in infiltration anaesthesia: a pilot study. Br Dent J 197:45–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dudkiewicz A, Schwartz S, Laliberté R (1987) Effectiveness of mandibular infiltration in children using the local anesthetic Ultracaine (articaine hydrochloride). J Can Dent Assoc 53:29–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vree TB, Gielen MJ (2005) Clinical pharmacology and the use of articaine for local and regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 19:293–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lima-Junior JL, Dias-Ribeiro E, de Araujo TN, Ferreira-Rocha J, Honfi-Junior ES, Sarmento CF, Seabra FR, de Sousa MS (2009) Evaluation of the buccal vestibule–palatal diffusion of 4% articaine hydrochloride in impacted maxillary third molar extractions. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 14:129–132

    Google Scholar 

  7. Winther JE, Nathalang B (1972) Effectivity of a new local analgesic Hoe 40 045. Scand J Dent Res 80:272–278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Elad S, Admon D, Kedmi M, Naveh E, Benzki E, Ayalon S, Tuchband A, Lutan H, Kaufman E (2008) The cardiovascular effect of local anesthesia with articaine plus 1:200,000 adrenalin versus lidocaine plus 1:100,000 adrenalin in medically compromised cardiac patients: a prospective, randomized, double blinded study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105:725–730. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davenport RE, Porcelli RJ, Iacono VJ, Bonura CF, Mallis GI, Baer PN (1990) Effects of anesthetics containing epinephrine on catecholamine levels during periodontal surgery. J Periodontol 61:553–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunlevy TM, O’Malley TP, Postma GN (1996) Optimal concentration of epinephrine for vasoconstriction in neck surgery. Laryngoscope 106:1412–1414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Laragnoit AB, Neves RS, Neves IL, Vieira JE (2009) Locoregional anesthesia for dental treatment in cardiac patients. Clin Sao Paulo 64:177–182

    Google Scholar 

  12. O’Malley TP, Postma GN, Holtel M, Girod DA (1995) Effect of local epinephrine on cutaneous bloodflow in the human neck. Laryngoscope 105:140–143. doi:10.1288/00005537-199502000-00005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen TG, Morton NS, Cullen PM, Watson DG (2001) Plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine with and without adrenaline following caudal anaesthesia in infants. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 45:42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lipp M, Dick W, Daublander M, Fuder H, Stanton-Hicks M (1993) Exogenous and endogenous plasma levels of epinephrine during dental treatment under local anesthesia. Reg Anesth 18:6–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meechan JG, Jastak JT, Donaldson D (1994) The use of epinephrine in dentistry. J Can Dent Assoc 60(825–828):831–824

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yagiela JA (1995) Vasoconstrictor agents for local anesthesia. Anesth Prog 42:116–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tofoli GR, Ramacciato JC, de Oliveira PC, Volpato MC, Groppo FC, Ranali J (2003) Comparison of effectiveness of 4% articaine associated with 1: 100,000 or 1: 200,000 epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve block. Anesth Prog 50:164–168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruffolo RR Jr, Nichols AJ, Stadel JM, Hieble JP (1991) Structure and function of alpha-adrenoceptors. Pharmacol Rev 43:475–505

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Petrikas AZ, Egorova VA, Ermilova KV (2009) Articaine and adrenaline combinations efficacy for dental anesthesia. Stomatol Mosk 5:24–26

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moore PA, Boynes SG, Hersh EV, DeRossi SS, Sollecito TP, Goodson JM, Leonel JS, Floros C, Peterson C, Hutcheson M (2006) The anesthetic efficacy of 4 percent articaine 1:200,000 epinephrine: two controlled clinical trials. J Am Dent Assoc 137:1572–1581

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdulwahab M, Boynes S, Moore P, Seifikar S, Al-Jazzaf A, Alshuraidah A, Zovko J, Close J (2009) The efficacy of six local anesthetic formulations used for posterior mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc 140:1018–1024

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Santos CF, Modena KC, Giglio FP, Sakai VT, Calvo AM, Colombini BL, Sipert CR, Dionisio TJ, Faria FA, Trindade AS Jr, Lauris JR (2007) Epinephrine concentration (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) does not affect the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:2445–2452. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore PA, Doll B, Delie RA, Hersh EV, Korostoff J, Johnson S, Goodson JM, Halem S, Palys M, Leonel JS, Kozlowski VA, Peterson C, Hutcheson M (2007) Hemostatic and anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine HCl with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 4% articaine HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine when administered intraorally for periodontal surgery. J Periodontol 78:247–253. doi:10.1902/jop.2007.060314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Potocnik I, Bajrovic F (1999) Failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in endodontics. Endod Dent Traumatol 15:247–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meyer FU (1999) Complications of local dental anesthesia and anatomical causes. Anat Anz 181:105–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fan S, Chen WL, Pan CB, Huang ZQ, Xian MQ, Yang ZH, Dias-Ribeiro E, Liang YC, Jiao JY, Ye YS, Wen TY (2009) Anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal infiltration or periodontal ligament injections with articaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis in the mandibular first molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:e89–e93. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.06.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tortamano IP, Siviero M, Costa CG, Buscariolo IA, Armonia PL (2009) A comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 35:165–168. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Srinivasan N, Kavitha M, Loganathan CS, Padmini G (2009) Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107:133–136. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Corbett IP, Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG (2008) Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars. J Endod 34:514–518. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Evans G, Nusstein J, Drum M, Reader A, Beck M (2008) A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations. J Endod 34:389–393. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sierra Rebolledo A, Delgado Molina E, Berini Aytís L, Gay Escoda C (2007) Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 12:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  32. Maniglia-Ferreira C, Almeida-Gomes F, Carvalho-Sousa B, Barbosa AV, Lins CC, Souza FD, Santos RA (2009) Clinical evaluation of the use of three anesthetics in endodontics. Acta Odontol Latinoam 22:21–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Costa CG, Tortamano IP, Rocha RG, Francischone CE, Tortamano N (2005) Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration. Quintessence Int 36:197–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Daublander M, Muller R, Lipp MD (1997) The incidence of complications associated with local anesthesia in dentistry. Anesth Prog 44:132–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hersh EV, Giannakopoulos H, Levin LM, Secreto S, Moore PA, Peterson C, Hutcheson M, Bouhaljib M, Mosenkis A, Townsend RR, Elliot V (2006) The pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects of high-dose articaine with 1:100,000 an 1:200,000 epinephrine. J Am Dent Assoc 137:1562–1571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Daubländer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daubländer, M., Kämmerer, P.W., Willershausen, B. et al. Clinical use of an epinephrine-reduced (1/400,000) articaine solution in short-time dental routine treatments—a multicenter study. Clin Oral Invest 16, 1289–1295 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0608-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0608-x

Keywords

Navigation