Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biomechanical role of peri-implant trabecular structures during vertical loading

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the load transfer paths in cortical bone and trabecular structure of cancellous bone in the jawbones for loads from endosseous implants. Maxillae were resected from beagle dogs 6 months after implant surgery and imaged using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). A three-dimensional structure was produced based on the CT data and peri-implant trabecular structure was observed. Load transfer paths were analyzed from the results of three-dimensional finite element analysis. Furthermore, buffer actions in bone trabeculae when strain increased during stress analysis and when loads were applied were observed. Peri-implant bone trabeculae were seen extending into the upper and lower cortical bone from the fixture. The direction of bone trabecular alignment corresponded with the load transfer paths. In addition, analysis with increased strain confirmed that trabecular structures could serve as load buffers. These results suggest that bone trabeculae supporting load transfer from implants undergo remodeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eraslan O, Inan O (2009) The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis. Clin Oral Investig, June 20 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s00784-009-0305-1

  2. Duyck J, Rønold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H et al (2001) The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:207–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S et al (2004) Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants. Considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 15:401–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liang K, Yingying S, Kaijin H et al (2008) Selections of the cylinder implant neck taper and implant end fillet for optimal biomechanical properties. A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Biomech 41:1124–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ming LH, Fang CC, Hung CK et al (2007) Influence of off-axis loading of an anterior maxillary implant. A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22:301–309

    Google Scholar 

  6. Müller R, Rüegsegger P (1997) Micro-tomographic imaging for the nondestructive evaluation of trabecular bone architecture. Stud Health Technol Inform 40:61–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ulrich D, Hildebrand T, Van RB et al (1997) The quality of trabecular bone evaluated with micro-computed tomography, FEA and mechanical testing. Stud Health Technol Inform 40:97–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takano N, Nakano T, Umakoshi Y et al (2007) High-resolution image-based simulation of biological hard tissues. Materia Japan 7:456–459

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stegaroiu R, Watanabe N, Tanaka M et al (2006) Peri-implant stress analysis in simulation models with or without trabecular bone structure. Int J Prosthodont 19:40–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsunaga S, Okudera H, Abe S et al (2008) The influence of bite force on the internal structure of the mandible through implant. J Oral Biosci 50:194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamada A, Yamakura D, Kishi M (2005) Three-dimensional observation of internal structure of canine mandible by microcomputed tomography. Morphometric differences between loaded and unloaded cancellous bone around implants. Shikwa Gak 105:577–587

    Google Scholar 

  12. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J 2001;94:569–573

  13. Kong L, Sun Y, Hu K et al (2008) Selections of the cylinder implant neck taper and implant end fillet for optimal biomechanical properties. A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Biomech 41:1124–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee KI, Roh HS, Yoon SW (2003) Acoustic wave propagation in bovine cancellous bone: application of the modified Biot-Attenborough model. J Acoust Soc Am 114:2284–2293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parfitt AM (1994) Osteonal and hemi-osteonal remodeling: the spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem 55:273–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ et al (1987) Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech 20:1135–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lekholm U, Zarb GA (1985) Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds) Tissue-integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Quintessence, Chicago, pp 199–209

    Google Scholar 

  18. Misch CE (1990) Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive bone loading. Int J Oral Implantol 6:23–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Mitsuteru Asai and Mr. Kunihiko Taki of the Department of Micro System Technology, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, for providing valuable technical information. We also thank Professor Masatsugu Hashimoto of the Department of Forensic Anthropology, Tokyo Dental College, for his thoughtful review of the manuscript. The authors also appreciate the enthusiastic cooperation of the staff of the Department of Anatomy, Tokyo Dental College. This study was supported by grants to Satoru Matsunaga (19890223, 20791441) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sport, Culture and Technology of Japan.

Conflict of interests

The authors have no financial relationship with the organization that sponsored the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoru Matsunaga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohashi, T., Matsunaga, S., Nakahara, K. et al. Biomechanical role of peri-implant trabecular structures during vertical loading. Clin Oral Invest 14, 507–513 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0332-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0332-y

Keywords

Navigation