Abstract
When relating the change of periodontal attachment level to its baseline value, mathematical coupling has to be taken into account. Oldham’s strategy of testing the differences in variances of two repeated measurements was recently advocated as a possible solution. Here, a simple bivariate three-level (site and subject with a lowest level specifying the multivariate structure) model is introduced where gingival units (sites) were nested in subjects. It allows the easy interpretation of the variance–covariance structure and fixed model estimates, and provides an unbiased estimate of the correlation between the mean and change of periodontal measurements. The properties of this model are exemplified using data of a study on the clinical effects of non-surgical periodontal therapy in adults. Based on the covariance terms, correlation between the change in clinical attachment after therapy and the mean of the pre-operative and post-operative attachment level was very low (about −0.11, p < 0.001) at the site level, and not significant at the subject level. Regarding the attachment level, differential treatment effects may be neglected. With regard to periodontal probing depth, however, patients with larger extent and severity would benefit more from treatment. The present communication provides an easy strategy for the avoidance of mathematical coupling in the study between change and initial value by employing a bivariate multi-level model.
References
Blance AJ, Tu YK, Gilthorpe MS (2005) A multilevel modeling solution to mathematic coupling. Stat Methods Med Res 14:553–565
Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i(8476):307–310
Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang KY, Zeger SL (2002) The analysis of longitudinal data, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Goldstein H, Browne WJ, Rasbash J (2002) Multilevel modelling of medical data. Stat Med 21:3291–3315
Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Trombelli L, Heitz F, Needleman I, Moles D (2002) A systematic review of the effect of surgical debridement vs. non-surgical debridement for the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 29(Suppl 3):92–102
Müller HP, Heinecke A (2004) Clinical effects of scaling and root planing in adults infected with Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Clin Oral Investig 8:63–69
Müller HP, Stadermann S (2006) Multivariate multilevel models for repeated measures in the study of smoking effects on the association between plaque and gingival bleeding. Clin Oral Investig 10:311–316
Oldham PD (1962) A note on the analysis or repeated measurements of the same subjects. J Chronic Dis 15:969–977
Rasbash J, Goldstein H (2004) Mathematical coupling: a simpler approach. Int J Epidemiol 33:1401–1402
Tu YK, Gilthorpe MS (2007) Revisiting the relation between change and initial value: a review and evaluation. Stat Med 26:443–457
Acknowledgement
Supported by the Kuwait University Research Administration, Grant #DS04/02.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müller, HP. A bivariate multi-level model, which avoids mathematical coupling in the study of change and initial periodontal attachment level after therapy. Clin Oral Invest 11, 307–310 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0099-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0099-y