Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Iatrogenic injury to oral branches of the trigeminal nerve: records of 449 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aims of this study were threefold: (1) to describe iatrogenic lesions to oral branches of the trigeminal nerve, signs and symptoms, and functional status, (2) to report on a simple neurosensory examination method, and (3) to discuss means of prevention of iatrogenic injury. The etiology and functional status of 449 injuries to oral branches collected over 18 years were retrospectively reviewed. A simple scheme of a clinical neurosensory examination was applied to enable a quantified rating of the perception. Injury to the lingual nerve (n = 261) is not only the most prevalent type of lesion, it also seems to be the most devastating type of lesion. Third molar surgery (n = 319) counts for the majority of injuries to the lingual, inferior alveolar, and buccal nerves. Lesions related to the injection of local analgesics was the second most frequent etiology (n = 78), and the lingual nerve was affected more frequently and severely than other oral branches of the trigeminal nerve. The female gender was overrepresented in incidence of injured nerves but no difference was found in the severity of affection between females and males. All grades of loss of neurosensory functions were found, and a range of neurogenic malfunctions was reported. Methodological obstacles in clinical neurosensory examination of trigeminal nerve injury and the magnitude of neurosensory impairment are discussed. Many nerve injuries are avoidable by critical reevaluation of indications, increased awareness of potential hazards, and modified surgical procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akal ÜK, Sayan NB, Aydogan S, Yaman Z (2000) Evaluation of the neurosensory deficiencies of oral and maxillofacial region following surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29:331–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartling R, Freeman K, Kraut RA (1999) The incidence of altered sensation of the mental nerve after mandibular implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57:1408–1412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bataineh AB (2001) Sensory nerve impairment following mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:1012–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carmichael FA, McGowan DA (1992) Incidence of nerve damage following third molar removal: a West of Scotland Oral Surgery Research Group Study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30:78–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaushu G, Taicher S, Halamish-Shani T, Givol N (2002) Medicolegal aspects of altered sensation following implant placement in the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:413–415

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cornelius CP, Roser M, Ehrenfeld M (1997) Mikroneurale Wiederherstellung nach iatrogenen Läsionen des N. Lingualis und des N. alveolaris inferior. Kritische Bestandsaufnahme. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 1:213–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dao TT, Mellor A (1998) Sensory disturbances associated with implant surgery. Int J Prosthodont 11:462–469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dodson TB, Kaban LB (1997) Recommendations for management of trigeminal nerve defects based on a critical appraisal of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:1380–1386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fielding AF, Rachiele DP, Frazier G (1997) Lingual nerve paresthesia following third molar surgery. A retrospective clinical study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 84:345–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gargallo-Albiol J, Buenechea-Imaz R, Gay-Escoda C (2000) Lingual nerve protection during surgical removal of lower third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29:268–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerlach KL, Hoffmeister B, Walz C (1989) Dysästhesien und Anästhesien des N. mandibularis nach zahnärztlicher Bahandlung. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 44:970–972

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gomes AC, Vasconcelos BC, de Oliveira e Silva ED, da Silva LC (2005) Lingual nerve damage after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:1443–1446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grotz KA, Al-Nawas B, de Aguiar EG, Schulz A, Wagner W (1998) Treatment of injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve after endodontic procedures. Clin Oral Investig 2:73–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haas DA, Lennon D (1995) A 21 year retrospective study of reports of paresthesia following local anaesthetic administration. J Can Dent Assoc 61:319–330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Handschel J, Figgener L, Joos U (2001) Die forensische Bewertung von Verletzungen der Nerven und des Kieferknochens nach Weisheitszahnentfernungen im Blickwinkel der aktuellen Rechtsprechung. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 5:44–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harn SD, Durham TM (1990) Incidence of lingual nerve trauma and postinjection complications in conventional mandibular block anaesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc 121:519–523

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hillerup S, Hjørting-Hansen E, Reumert T (1994) Repair of the lingual nerve after iatrogenic injury: a follow-up study of return of sensation and taste. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:1028–1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hillerup S, Jensen R (2001) Iatrogene nerveskader opstået i almen tandlægepraksis. Hyppighed, årsager og symptomer. Tandlaegebladet 105:614–622

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hillerup S, Jensen R (2006) Nerve injury caused by mandibular block analgesia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:437–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Krafft TC, Hickel R (1994) Clinical investigation into the incidence of direct damage to the lingual nerve caused by local anaesthesia. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 22:294–296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kraut RA, Chahal O (2002) Management of patients with trigeminal nerve injuries after mandibular implant placement. J Am Dent Assoc 133:1351–1354

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. LaBanc JP, Gregg JM (1992) Trigeminal nerve injuries. Basic problems, historical perspectives, early successes, and remaining challenges. In: LaBanc JP, Gregg JM (eds) Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 277–283

    Google Scholar 

  23. Loescher AR, Smith KG, Robinson PP (2003) Nerve damage and third molar removal. Dent Update 30:375–380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lydiatt DD (2003) Litigation and the lingual nerve. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:197–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mason DA (1988) Lingual nerve damage following lower third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 17:290–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pogrel MA, Lee JS, Muff DF (2004) Coronectomy: a technique to protect the inferior alveolar nerve. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:1447–1452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pogrel MA, Thamby S (2004) Permanent nerve involvement resulting from inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Am Dent Assoc 131:901–907

    Google Scholar 

  28. Renton T, McGurk M (2001) Evaluation of factors predictive of lingual nerve injury in third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:423–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Robinson PP (1988) Observations on the recovery of sensation following inferior alveolar nerve injuries. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26:177–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Robinson PP, Loescher AR, Smith KG (2000) A prospective, quantitative study on the clinical outcome of lingual nerve repair. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:255–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Robinson PP, Smith KG (1996) A study of the efficacy of late lingual nerve repair. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:96–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Robinson PP, Smith KG (1996) Lingual nerve damage during lower third molar removal: a comparison of two surgical methods. Br Dent J 180:456–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Robinson PP, Smith KG, Johnson FP, Coppins DA (1992) Equipment and methods for simple sensory testing. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30:387–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rood JP, Shehab BAA (1990) The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28:20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sandstedt P, Sörensen S (1995) Neurosensory disturbances of the trigeminal nerve: a long-term follow-up of traumatic injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:498–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sunderland S (1991) Nerve injury and sensory function. In: Sunderland S (ed) Nerve injuries and their repair: a critical appraisal. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 305–332

    Google Scholar 

  37. Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jääskiläinen SK, Forsell K, Virtanen A, Forsell H (2003) An evaluation of clinical and electrophysiological tests in nerve injury diagnosis after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32:1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Venta I, Lindqvist C, Ylipaavalniemi P (1998) Malpractice claims for permanent nerve injuries related to third molar removals. Acta Odontol Scand 56:193–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Walters H (1995) Reducing lingual nerve damage in third molar surgery: a clinical audit of 1350 cases. Br Dent J 25:140–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Westermark A (1999) On inferior alveolar nerve function after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. Thesis, Kongl Carolinska Medico ChirurGiska Institutet, Stockholm, pp 1–49

  41. Wismeijer D, van Waas MA, Vermeeren JI, Kalk W (1997) Patients’ perception of sensory disturbances of the mental nerve before and after implant surgery: a prospective study of 110 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:254–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Worthington P (2004) Injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: a formula for protection of the patient and clinician. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:731–734

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zuniga JR, Meyer RA, Gregg JM, Miloro M, Davis LF (1998) The accuracy of clinical neurosensory testing for nerve injury diagnosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:2–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Søren Hillerup.

Appendix

Appendix

Applied neurological terms in alphabetic order

Ageusia:

absence of gustatory perception

Allodynia:

pain due to a stimulus that is not normally painful when applied elsewhere to the body

Anesthesia:

insensitivity to all forms of stimulation

Analgesia:

absence of pain in response to stimulation that should normally be painful

Dysgeusia:

distorted gustatory perception

Dysesthesia:

any unpleasant abnormal sensation, either spontaneous or evoked, used in this study to describe painful paresthesia and burning neurogenic discomfort and pain

Hypesthesia:

diminished sensitivity to all forms of stimulation

Hyperesthesia:

increased sensitivity to all forms of stimulation

Paresthesia:

unusual, abnormal but not painful, spontaneous or evoked sensations (tingling or pricking sensation)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hillerup, S. Iatrogenic injury to oral branches of the trigeminal nerve: records of 449 cases. Clin Oral Invest 11, 133–142 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-006-0089-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-006-0089-5

Keywords

Navigation