Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Resin composites: strength of the bond to dentin versus mechanical properties

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study (1) investigated whether the combination of an adhesive system from one manufacturer with a resin composite from the same manufacturer provides superior bonding of the resin composite to dentin compared with the combination of an adhesive system from one manufacturer with a resin composite from another manufacturer, and (2) tested for a possible influence on bond strength of mechanical properties of the resin composite. After application of an adhesive system, a resin composite was bonded to flattened human dentin and tested in shear after 1 week. Five adhesive systems (AdheSE, Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil SE Bond, Optibond Solo Plus, and Xeno III) were tested with each of five resin composites (Tetric Ceram, Filtek Supreme, Clearfil AP-X, Premise, and EsthetX). The mechanical properties flexural strength and flexural modulus were determined by three-point loading. Bond strengths were influenced by the brand of adhesive system (P < 0.0001) and by the brand of resin composite (P < 0.0001), but the combination of an adhesive system from one manufacturer with a resin composite from the same manufacturer did not provide bond strengths that were superior to those obtained when an adhesive system from one manufacturer was combined with a resin composite from another manufacturer. Independent of the brand of resin composite, the adhesive system Clearfil SE Bond mediated the highest bond strength to dentin. For each adhesive system, the resin composite Clearfil AP-X resulted in the highest bond strength to dentin. Significant positive correlations were found between bond strength and flexural strength (P < 0.0026, r = 0.21) and between bond strength and flexural modulus (P < 0.0017, r = 0.22).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A (2005) Resin composites: strength of the bond to dentin versus surface energy parameters. Dent Mater 21:1039–1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carvalho RM, Mendonca JL, Santiago SL, Silveira RR, Garcia FCP, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2003) Effects of HEMA/solvent combinations on bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 82:597–601

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Munck J, van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 82:136–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B (2005) One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 30:39–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL, Musanje L (2003) Effect of light activation method on flexural properties of dental composites. Am J Dent 16:318–322

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Koike T, Yukitani W, Hisamitsu H, Wakumoto S, Fujishima A (1999) Effect of mechanical properties of resin composites on the efficacy of the dentin bonding system. Oper Dent 24:323–330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Endo K, Kaga M, Sano H, Oguchi H (2000) The effect of hybrid layer thickness on bond strength: demineralized dentin zone of the hybrid layer. Dent Mater 16:406–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, Waller JL, Pashley DH (2005) Effects of multiple coating of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent 7:133–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobsen T, Söderholm KJ (1995) Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 11:132–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaaden C, Powers JM, Friedl KH, Schmalz G (2002) Bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dental hard tissues. Clin Oral Investig 6:155–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Homer JA (1993) Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int 24:618–631

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pashley DH, Tay FR (2001) Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 17:430–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, de Munck J, van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B (2005) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 21:864–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (2004) Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composite. J Dent 32:109–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roh BD, Chung JH (2005) Micro-shear bond strength of five resin-based composites to dentin with five different dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 18:333–337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Takahashi A, Sato Y, Uno S, Pereira PN, Sano H (2002) Effects of mechanical properties of adhesive resins on bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 18:263–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ (2000) Microtensile bond strengths of seven adhesive systems. Dent Mater 16:180–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tay FR, Pashley DH (2001) Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I. Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 17:296–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CKY, Sanares AM, Wei SHY (2003) Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesive and chemically cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 5:27–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K, Pashley DH (1999) Hybridization effectiveness of a two-step versus a three-step smear layer removing adhesive system examined correlatively by TEM and AFM. J Adhes Dent 1:7–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Meerbeek B, de Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G (1993) Composite resins in the 21st century. Quintessence Int 24:641–658

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zheng L, Pereira PNR, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J (2001) Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 26:97–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zidan O, Asmussen E, Jörgensen KD (1980) Correlation between tensile and bond strength of composite resin. Scand J Res 88:348–351

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank 3M Dental Products, Dentsply DeTrey, Ivoclar Vivadent, Kerr, and RH Dental for providing the materials for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Peutzfeldt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomsen, K.B., Peutzfeldt, A. Resin composites: strength of the bond to dentin versus mechanical properties. Clin Oral Invest 11, 45–49 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-006-0077-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-006-0077-9

Keywords

Navigation