Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 134–139 | Cite as

The monitoring of deep caries lesions after incomplete dentine caries removal: results after 14–18 months

  • E. F. Oliveira
  • G. Carminatti
  • V. Fontanella
  • M. MaltzEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This paper aims to assess radiographic changes after incomplete carious dentine removal and tooth sealing. Thirty-two teeth with deep caries lesions were studied. The treatment consisted of incomplete excavation, application of a Ca(OH)2 layer, sealing temporarily for a 6- to 7-month period and then restoration. Standardised bitewing radiographs were taken immediately after the temporary sealing and at 6- to 7- and 14- to 18-month intervals. The digitised images were analysed blind by image subtraction. The quantitative analyses subtractions were performed in the radiolucent zone (RZ) beneath the restoration and in two adjacent control areas (CA). Two cases were lost during the 6- to 7-month period (one pulp necrosis and one pulp exposure during removal of the provisional sealing). No difference (p>0.05) was observed in the radiographic density of the CA and the RZ in the two experimental periods. The mean and standard deviation (grey tonalities scale) were 129.42±5.83 and 127.65±4.67 (control areas) and 132.96±7.41 and 132.90±5.99 (RZ) for the first and second experimental periods, respectively. The radiographic density of the CA differed from the RZ (Tukey test, p<0.001). Interference in environmental conditions by partial dentine caries removal and tooth sealing arrests lesion progression, suggesting that complete dentine caries removal is not essential to control caries progression.

Keywords

Carious dentine removal Deep caries lesion Remineralisation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support from the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology through its agency National Council of Research (CNPq), Kulzer (São Paulo, Brazil), Jon (São Paulo, Brazil) and Sérgio Kato for statistical analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Zayer MA, Straffon LH, Feigal RJ, Welch KB (2003) Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 25:29–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson BG (1938) Clinical study of arresting dental caries. J Dent Res 17:443–452Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aponte A, Hartsook J, Crowley M (1966) Indirect pulp capping success verified. J Dent Child 33:164–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Backer Dirks O (1966) Posteruptive changes in dental enamel. J Dent Res 45:503–511Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Besic FC (1943) The fate of bacteria sealed in dental cavities. J Dent Res 22:349–354Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bjørndal L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A (1997) A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Res 31:411–417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bjørndal L, Thylstrup A (1998) A practice-based study on stepwise excavation of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a 1-year follow-up study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 26:122–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bjørndal L (2002) Dentin caries: progression and clinical management. Oper Dent 27:211–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brägger U, Hämmerle CHF, Mombelli A, Bürgin W, Lang NP (1992) Remodelling of periodontal tissues adjacent to sites treated according to the principles of guided tissue regeneration (GTR). J Clin Periodontol 19:615–624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carvalho JC, Ekstrand KR, Thylstrup A (1989) Dental plaque and caries on occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars in relation to stage of eruption. J Dent Res 68:773–779PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Christgau M, Hiller K-A, Schmalz G, Kolbeck C, Wenzel A (1998) Accuracy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography for determining changes in calcium mass in mandibular bone: an in vitro study. J Periodontal Res 33:138–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eberhard J, Hartman B, Lenhard M, Mayer T, Kocher T, Eickholz P (2000) Digital subtraction radiography for monitoring dental demineralization. An in vitro study. Caries Res 34:219–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eidelman E, Finn SB, Koulourides T (1965) Remineralization of carious dentin treated with calcium hydroxide. J Dent Child 32:218–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elwood RP, Davies RM, Worthington HV (1997) Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system. J Periodontal Res 32:241–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Falster CA, Araujo FB, Straffon LH, Nor JE (2002) Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin–pulp complex. Pediatr Dent 24:241–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Formousis I, Brägger U, Bürgin W, Tonetti M, Lang NP (1994) Digital image processing. I. Evaluation of gray level correction methods in vitro. Clin Oral Implants Res 5:37–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Handellman SL, Leverett DH, Solomon ES, Brenner SM (1981) Use of adhesive sealants over occlusal carious lesions: radiographic evaluation. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 9:256–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Held-Wydler E (1964) “Natural” (indirect) pulp capping. J Dent Child 31:107–113Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holmen L, Thylstrup A, Artun J (1987) Clinical and histological features observed during arrestment of active enamel carious lesions in vivo. Caries Res 21:546–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jaeger RG (1988) Comportamento biológico da dentina cariada humana após o capeamento pulpar indireto. Estudo morfológico pela microscopia de luz e eletrônica. Thesis, University of São Paulo, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS, Webber RL, Williams RC, Ruttimann UE (1987) Extraoral control of geometry for digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 22:396–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jordan RE, Suzuki M (1971) Conservative treatment of deep carious lesions. J Can Dent Assoc 37:337–342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kerkhov JR, Herman SC, Klein A, Macdonald RE (1967) A clinical and television densitometric evaluation of the indirect pulp capping technique. J Dent Child 34:193–201Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khademi JA (1996) Digital images & sound. J Dent Educ 60:41–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D (1993) The use of a caries detector dye during cavity preparation: a microbiological assessment. Br Dent J 174:245–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kidd EAM (2004) How “clean” must a cavity be before restoration? Caries Res 38:305–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    King JB, Crawford JJ, Lindall RL, Hill C (1965) Indirect pulp capping: a bacteriologic study of deep carious dentine in human teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 20:663–671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kuwabara R, Massler M (1966) Pulpal reactions to active and arrested carious lesions. J Dent Child 33:190–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leksell E, Ridell K, Cvek ME, Mejare I (1996) Pulp exposure after stepwise versus direct complete excavation of deep carious lesions in young posterior permanent teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 12:192–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maltz M, Oliveira EF, Fontanella V, Bianchi R (2002) A clinical, microbiologic, and radiographic study of deep caries lesions after incomplete caries removal. Quintessence Int 33:151–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Massara MLA, Alves JB, Brandão PRG (2002) Atraumatic restorative treatment: clinical, ultrastructural and chemical analysis. Caries Res 36:430–436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Massler M (1978) Treatment of profound caries to prevent pulpal damage. J Pedod 2:99–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis Jr, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA, Adair SM (1998) Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10. J Am Dent Assoc 129:55–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE (2000) Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 50:361–366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Murray PE, Hafez AA, Windsor LJ, Smith AJ, Cox CF (2002) Comparison of pulp responses following restoration of exposed and non-exposed cavities. J Dent 30:213–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nyvad B, Fejerskov O (1986) Active root surface caries converted into inactive caries as a response to oral hygiene. Scand J Dent Res 94:281–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pashley EL, Talman R, Horner JA, Pashley DH (1991) Permeability of normal versus carious dentin. Endod Dent Traumatol 7:207–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ribeiro CC, Baratieri LN, Perdigão J et al (1999) A clinical, radiographic, and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of adhesive restorations on carious dentin in primary teeth. Quintessence Int 30:591–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ruttimann EU, Webber RL, Schmidt E (1986) A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 21:486–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sarnat H, Massler M (1965) Microstructure of active and arrested dentinal caries. J Dent Res 44:1389–1401Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shovelton DS (1968) A study of deep carious dentine. Int Dent J 18:392–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tziafas D, Smith AJ, Lesot H (2000) Designing new treatment strategies in vital pulp therapy. J Dent 28:77–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vandre RH, Webber RL (1995) Future trends in dental radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80:471–478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Weerheijm KL, Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ, Groen HJ, van Amerongen WE (1999) Bacterial counts in carious dentine under restorations: 2-year in vivo effects. Caries Res 33:130–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wenzel A, Anthonisen PN, Juul MB (2000) Reproducibility in the assessment of caries lesion behaviour: a comparison between conventional film and subtraction radiography. Caries Res 34:214–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. F. Oliveira
    • 1
  • G. Carminatti
    • 2
  • V. Fontanella
    • 3
  • M. Maltz
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Dentistry, Faculty of OdontologyFederal University of PelotasPelotasBrazil
  2. 2.Departament of Social and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of OdontologyFederal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Radiology, Faculty of OdontologyFederal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations