Abstract
The price of a derivative security equals the discounted expected payoff of the security under a suitable measure, and Greeks are price sensitivities with respect to parameters of interest. When closed-form formulas do not exist, Monte Carlo simulation has proved very useful for computing the prices and Greeks of derivative securities. Although finite difference with resimulation is the standard method for estimating Greeks, it is in general biased and suffers from erratic behavior when the payoff function is discontinuous. Direct methods, such as the pathwise method and the likelihood ratio method, are proposed to differentiate the price formulas directly and hence produce unbiased Greeks (Broadie and Glasserman, Manag. Sci. 42:269–285, 1996). The pathwise method differentiates the payoff function, whereas the likelihood ratio method differentiates the densities. When both methods apply, the pathwise method generally enjoys lower variances, but it requires the payoff function to be Lipschitz-continuous. Similarly to the pathwise method, our method differentiates the payoff function but lifts the Lipschitz-continuity requirements on the payoff function. We build a new but simple mathematical formulation so that formulas of Greeks for a broad class of derivative securities can be derived systematically. We then present an importance sampling method to estimate the Greeks. These formulas are the first in the literature. Numerical experiments show that our method gives unbiased Greeks for several popular multi-asset options (also called rainbow options) and a path-dependent option.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benhamou, E.: Optimal Malliavin weighting function for the computation of the Greeks. Math. Finance 13, 37–53 (2003)
Boyle, P.: Options: A Monte Carlo approach. J. Financ. Econ. 4, 323–338 (1977)
Boyle, P., Evnine, J., Gibbs, S.: Numerical evaluation of multivariate contingent claims. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2, 241–250 (1989)
Broadie, M., Glasserman, P.: Estimating security price derivatives using simulation. Manag. Sci. 42, 269–285 (1996)
Carmona, R., Durrleman, V.: Pricing and hedging spread options. SIAM Rev. 45, 627–685 (2003)
Cox, J.C., Ross, S.A.: The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes. J. Financ. Econ. 3, 145–166 (1976)
Cox, J.C., Ingersoll, J.E., Ross, S.A.: An intertemporal general equilibrium model of asset prices. Econometrica 53, 363–384 (1985)
Fournié, E., Lasry, J., Lebuchoux, J., Lions, P., Touzi, N.: Applications of Malliavin calculus to Monte Carlo methods in finance. Finance Stoch. 3, 391–412 (1999)
Fu, M., Hu, J.-Q.: Conditional Monte Carlo: Gradient Estimation and Optimization Applications. Kluwer Academic, Norwell (1997)
Glasserman, P.: Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering. Springer, New York (2004)
Harrison, J.M., Kreps, D.: Martingale and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets. J. Econ. Theory 20, 381–408 (1979)
Hörfelt, P.: A short cut to the rainbow. Risk 21(6), 90–93 (2008)
Hull, J.: Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)
Jäckel, P.: Monte Carlo Methods in Finance. Wiley, West Sussex (2002)
Johnson, H.: Options on the maximum or the minimun of several assets. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 22, 277–283 (1987)
Kirk, E.: Correlation in the energy markets. In: Jameson, R. (ed.) Managing Energy Price Risk, pp. 71–78. Risk Publications and Enron, London (1995)
Kunitomo, N., Ikeda, M.: Pricing option with curved boundaries. Math. Finance 2, 275–298 (1992)
Liu, G., Hong, L.J.: Pathwise estimation of the Greeks of financial options. Working Paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and Logistics Management, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (2008). http://www.cb.cityu.edu.hk/Portfolio/Staff.cfm?EID=guanliu
Liu, J.S.: Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing. Springer, New York (2001)
Lyuu, Y.-D.: Financial Engineering and Computation: Principles, Mathematics, Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
Margrabe, W.: The value of an option to exchange one asset for another. J. Finance 33, 177–186 (1978)
Merton, R.: Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 4, 141–183 (1973)
Nelken, I.: The Handbook of Exotic Options: Instruments, Analysis, and Application. McGraw-Hill, New York (1996)
Pearson, N.D.: An efficient approach for pricing spread options. J. Deriv. 3, 76–91 (1995)
Rubinstein, M.: Somewhere over the rainbow. Risk 4(10), 63–66 (1991)
Reiner, E., Rubinstein, M.: Breaking down the barriers. Risk Mag. 4, 28–35 (1991)
Schroder, M.: Computing the constant elasticity of variance option pricing formula. J. Finance 44, 211–219 (1989)
Shevchenko, R.V.: Addressing the bias in Monte Carlo pricing of multi-asset options with multiple barriers through discrete sampling. J. Comput. Finance 6, 1–20 (2003)
Sidenius, J.: Double barrier options: valuation by path counting. J. Comput. Finance 1, 63–79 (1998)
Stulz, R.: Options on the minimum or the maximum of two risky assets. J. Financ. Econ. 10, 161–185 (1982)
Tavella, D., Randall, C.: Pricing Financial Instruments: The Finite Difference Method. Wiley, New York (2000)
Wystup, U.: Foreign Exchange Options and Structured Products. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)
Zazanis, M., Suri, R.: Convergence rates of finite-difference sensitivities estimates for stochastic systems. Oper. Res. 41, 694–703 (1993)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Earlier versions of the paper were presented at the Midwest Finance Association 57th Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, February 29, 2008, and at the Eighth International Conference on Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing, Montreal, Canada, July 10, 2008. The first author was supported in part by the National Science Council of Taiwan under Grant 97-2221-E-002-096-MY3 and Excellent Research Projects of National Taiwan University under Grant 98R0062-05.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyuu, YD., Teng, HW. Unbiased and efficient Greeks of financial options. Finance Stoch 15, 141–181 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-010-0137-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-010-0137-5