Skip to main content
Log in

Unbiased and efficient Greeks of financial options

  • Published:
Finance and Stochastics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The price of a derivative security equals the discounted expected payoff of the security under a suitable measure, and Greeks are price sensitivities with respect to parameters of interest. When closed-form formulas do not exist, Monte Carlo simulation has proved very useful for computing the prices and Greeks of derivative securities. Although finite difference with resimulation is the standard method for estimating Greeks, it is in general biased and suffers from erratic behavior when the payoff function is discontinuous. Direct methods, such as the pathwise method and the likelihood ratio method, are proposed to differentiate the price formulas directly and hence produce unbiased Greeks (Broadie and Glasserman, Manag. Sci. 42:269–285, 1996). The pathwise method differentiates the payoff function, whereas the likelihood ratio method differentiates the densities. When both methods apply, the pathwise method generally enjoys lower variances, but it requires the payoff function to be Lipschitz-continuous. Similarly to the pathwise method, our method differentiates the payoff function but lifts the Lipschitz-continuity requirements on the payoff function. We build a new but simple mathematical formulation so that formulas of Greeks for a broad class of derivative securities can be derived systematically. We then present an importance sampling method to estimate the Greeks. These formulas are the first in the literature. Numerical experiments show that our method gives unbiased Greeks for several popular multi-asset options (also called rainbow options) and a path-dependent option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benhamou, E.: Optimal Malliavin weighting function for the computation of the Greeks. Math. Finance 13, 37–53 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyle, P.: Options: A Monte Carlo approach. J. Financ. Econ. 4, 323–338 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boyle, P., Evnine, J., Gibbs, S.: Numerical evaluation of multivariate contingent claims. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2, 241–250 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broadie, M., Glasserman, P.: Estimating security price derivatives using simulation. Manag. Sci. 42, 269–285 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Carmona, R., Durrleman, V.: Pricing and hedging spread options. SIAM Rev. 45, 627–685 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox, J.C., Ross, S.A.: The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes. J. Financ. Econ. 3, 145–166 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cox, J.C., Ingersoll, J.E., Ross, S.A.: An intertemporal general equilibrium model of asset prices. Econometrica 53, 363–384 (1985)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Fournié, E., Lasry, J., Lebuchoux, J., Lions, P., Touzi, N.: Applications of Malliavin calculus to Monte Carlo methods in finance. Finance Stoch. 3, 391–412 (1999)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu, M., Hu, J.-Q.: Conditional Monte Carlo: Gradient Estimation and Optimization Applications. Kluwer Academic, Norwell (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Glasserman, P.: Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering. Springer, New York (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Harrison, J.M., Kreps, D.: Martingale and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets. J. Econ. Theory 20, 381–408 (1979)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hörfelt, P.: A short cut to the rainbow. Risk 21(6), 90–93 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hull, J.: Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jäckel, P.: Monte Carlo Methods in Finance. Wiley, West Sussex (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson, H.: Options on the maximum or the minimun of several assets. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 22, 277–283 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kirk, E.: Correlation in the energy markets. In: Jameson, R. (ed.) Managing Energy Price Risk, pp. 71–78. Risk Publications and Enron, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kunitomo, N., Ikeda, M.: Pricing option with curved boundaries. Math. Finance 2, 275–298 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, G., Hong, L.J.: Pathwise estimation of the Greeks of financial options. Working Paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and Logistics Management, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (2008). http://www.cb.cityu.edu.hk/Portfolio/Staff.cfm?EID=guanliu

  19. Liu, J.S.: Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing. Springer, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lyuu, Y.-D.: Financial Engineering and Computation: Principles, Mathematics, Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Margrabe, W.: The value of an option to exchange one asset for another. J. Finance 33, 177–186 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Merton, R.: Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 4, 141–183 (1973)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Nelken, I.: The Handbook of Exotic Options: Instruments, Analysis, and Application. McGraw-Hill, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pearson, N.D.: An efficient approach for pricing spread options. J. Deriv. 3, 76–91 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rubinstein, M.: Somewhere over the rainbow. Risk 4(10), 63–66 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reiner, E., Rubinstein, M.: Breaking down the barriers. Risk Mag. 4, 28–35 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schroder, M.: Computing the constant elasticity of variance option pricing formula. J. Finance 44, 211–219 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shevchenko, R.V.: Addressing the bias in Monte Carlo pricing of multi-asset options with multiple barriers through discrete sampling. J. Comput. Finance 6, 1–20 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sidenius, J.: Double barrier options: valuation by path counting. J. Comput. Finance 1, 63–79 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stulz, R.: Options on the minimum or the maximum of two risky assets. J. Financ. Econ. 10, 161–185 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tavella, D., Randall, C.: Pricing Financial Instruments: The Finite Difference Method. Wiley, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wystup, U.: Foreign Exchange Options and Structured Products. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zazanis, M., Suri, R.: Convergence rates of finite-difference sensitivities estimates for stochastic systems. Oper. Res. 41, 694–703 (1993)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huei-Wen Teng.

Additional information

Earlier versions of the paper were presented at the Midwest Finance Association 57th Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, February 29, 2008, and at the Eighth International Conference on Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing, Montreal, Canada, July 10, 2008. The first author was supported in part by the National Science Council of Taiwan under Grant 97-2221-E-002-096-MY3 and Excellent Research Projects of National Taiwan University under Grant 98R0062-05.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyuu, YD., Teng, HW. Unbiased and efficient Greeks of financial options. Finance Stoch 15, 141–181 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-010-0137-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-010-0137-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

JEL Classification

Navigation