Research on the influence mechanism of users’ quantified-self immersive experience: on the convergence of mobile intelligence and wearable computing


The rapid development of mobile intelligence and wearable computing promotes the rise of quantified-self. Users quantify themselves and realize self-tracking and self-cognition through the connection between mobile phone terminals and wearable computing devices. The characteristics of immersive quantified information design in the convergence mode of mobile intelligence and wearable computing attract many users to immerse into it. Based on the stimulus-body-response (S-O-R) model, this paper constructs an influence mechanism model that affects the immersive experience of quantified-self and adopts empirical research methods. This paper analyzes the influence of the information platform and content characteristics (interaction, ease of use, usefulness, entertainment) of the convergence of mobile intelligence and wearable computing on users’ immersive experience of quantified-self and the moderating effect of privacy concern and potential affordance on immersive experience and continuous participation. The results show that interaction, ease of use, usefulness, and entertainment all have a significant impact on users’ quantified-self immersive experience, and the influence is in the order of usefulness>ease of use>entertainment>interaction. Potential affordance and privacy concerns play a significant role in regulating the state of immersion and continuous participation. The conclusion of this study not only analyzes the influencing factors of users’ immersive experience of quantified-self from the characteristics of the convergence of mobile intelligence and wearable computing but also analyzes the relationship between users’ immersive experience of quantified-self and continuous participation from the perspective of potential affordance and privacy concerns. It provides opinions and suggestions for the interaction design and user information management of the convergence of mobile intelligence and wearable computing and has practical reference significance for related enterprises to improve user stickiness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1


  1. 1.

    Steve M (2010) Wearable computing: toward humanistic intelligence. Int Underw Syst Des 16(3):10–15

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    He J, Hu C, Li Y (2013) An autonomous fall detection and alerting system based on mobile and ubiquitous computing. In: 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing and 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 539–543

  3. 3.

    Lara OD, Labrador MA (2012) A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 15(3):1192–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mcgraw D, Belfort R, Pfister H (2015) Engaging patients while addressing their privacy concerns: the experience of project health design. Pers Ubiquit Comput 19(1):85–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chen R, Yang C (2014) Quantified Self: New opportunities of education research in the big data era——the 2014 Horizon Report of NMC. J Mod Educ Technol 24(11):5–11. (in china) Accessed 4 Nov 2020

  6. 6.

    Zhang YD, Li DJ (2018) A study on the barriers to consumer participation in quantifying self and its influencing mechanism. J Manag 15(01):74–83. (in china) Accessed 4 Nov 2020

  7. 7.

    Wu JH (2015) Big data era quantified-self support the personalized learning research. China Inf-ormation Technology Education,23(19):42–45. (in china) Accessed 4 Nov 2020

  8. 8.

    Fang HG, Luo JP (2016) Research on quantitative self-adaptive learning system of MOOC based on educational big data. Research on Audio-Visual Education 37(11):38–42+92. (in china) Accessed 4 Nov 2020

  9. 9.

    Xie WT, Xu C (2016) The application of quantified self concept in the design of personal health management products. Packaging Eng 5(4):79–83. (in china)

  10. 10.

    Li I, Dey A, Forlizzi J (2010) A stage-based model of personal informatics systems, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Georgia: USA, 557-566

  11. 11.

    Paton C, Hansen M, Fernandez L, Lau Y (2012) Self-tracking, social media and personal health records for patient empowered self-care. Contribution of the IMIA Social Media Working Group. Yearb Med Inform 7(7):16–24

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Van den Bulck J (2015) Sleep apps and the quantified-self: blessing or curse? J Sleep Res 24(2):121–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Csikszentmihalyi M (1975) Play and intrinsic rewards. In: Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 135–153

  14. 14.

    Koufaris M (2002) Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inf Syst Res 13(2):205–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Xue Y, Xu ZL (2016) Analysis of influencing factors of users’ information behavior in Wechat marketing environment and its modeling —— from the perspective of immersion theory. Intell Theory Pract 39(6):104–109. (in china) Accessed 4 Nov 2020

  16. 16.

    Xun J, Huang Q, Yuan QJ (2018) Immersion theory and its application and prospect in information system research. Journal of Modern Information 38(10):157–166. (in china) Accessed 4 Nov 2020

  17. 17.

    Westin AF (1968) Privacy and freedom. Wash Lee Law Rev 25(1):166–170

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Goodwin C (1991) Privacy: recognition of a consumer right. J Public Policy Mark 10(1):149–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dinev T, Hart P (2006) Internet privacy concerns and social awareness as determinants of intention to transact. Int J Electron Commer 10(2):7–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Alashoor T, Han S, Joseph RC (2017) Familiarity with big-data, privacy concerns, and self-disclosure accuracy in social networking websites: an APCO model. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 41:62–96

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Xu F, Michael K, Chen X (2013) Factors affecting privacy disclosure on social network sites: an integrated model. Electron Commer Res 13(2):151–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mamonov S, Benbunan FR (2017) Exploring factors affecting social e-commerce service adoption: the case of Facebook-Gifts. Int J Inf Manag 37(6):590–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Peng GJ, Ahao YR, Wang TG (2012) Android-based mobile phone privacy protection technology and implementation. Netinfo Security 10(4):54–57. (in china) Accessed 4 Nov 2020

  24. 24.

    Li SM (2015) Research on privacy leakage of Android phones. Computer Engineering & Software 11(2):69–72. (in china) Accessed 4 Nov 2020

  25. 25.

    Lanamäki A, Thapa D, Stendal K (2016) When is an affordance? Outlining four stances, Working Conference on Information Systems and Organizations. Springer, Cham, 125-139

  26. 26.

    Gibson JJ (1950) The Perception of the visual world. Riverside Press, Boston, pp 35–38

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Volkoff O, Strong DM (2018) Affordance theory and how to use it in IS research, in the rout ledge companion to management information systems. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Deng WH, Yi M (2018) Research on the adoption mechanism of additional comments of online users based on SOR model. Libr Theory Pract 56(8):33–39. (in china) Accessed 4 Nov 2020

  29. 29.

    Huang E (2012) Online experiences and virtual goods purchase intention. Internet Res 22(3):252–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Su CH, Hsaio KC (2015) Developing and evaluating gamifying learning system by using flow-based model. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 11(6):1283–1306

  31. 31.

    Saadé R, Bahli B (2005) The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manag 42(2):317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hsu CL, Lu HP (2004) Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Inf Manag 41(7):853–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Delone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4):9–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhou T, Lu Y (2011) Examining mobile instant messaging user loyalty from the perspectives of network externalities and flow experience. Comput Hum Behav 2(2):883–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hamari J, Koivisto J, Sarsa H (2014) Does gamification work? a literature review of empirical studies on gamification, the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE

  36. 36.

    Chang YP, Zhu DH (2012) The role of perceived social capital and flow experience in building users’ continuance intention to social networking sites in China. Comput Hum Behav 28(3):995–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Li Y (2011) Empirical studies on online information privacy concerns: literature review and an integrative framework. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 28(1):453–496

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ulmer G, Pallud J (2014) Understanding usages and affordances of enterprise social networks: a sociomaterial perspective. Proceedings 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, Georgia, USA

  39. 39.

    Pavlou PA, Liang H, Xue Y (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: a principal-agent perspective. MIS Q 31(1):105–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Oliver RL (1980) A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J Mark Res 17(6):460–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ladhari R (2007) The effect of consumption emotions on satisfaction and word-of-mouth communications. Psychol Mark 24(12):1085–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Algesheimer R, Borle S, Dholakia UM (2010) The impact of customer community participation on customer behaviors: an empirical investigation. Mark Sci 29(4):756–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.71962014), Thirteenth Five-Year Planning (2017) research project of Jiangxi Social Science (No.17GL05), and Jiangxi Universities Humanities and Social Sciences Research on Young Fund (GL17115).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Jin.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, H., Yan, J., Zhang, Y. et al. Research on the influence mechanism of users’ quantified-self immersive experience: on the convergence of mobile intelligence and wearable computing. Pers Ubiquit Comput (2020).

Download citation


  • Quantified-self
  • Immersive experience
  • Mobile intelligent
  • Wearable computing
  • Convergence