Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Making the city my own: uses and practices of mobile location technologies for exploration of a new city

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present an interview study of 13 recent newcomers to New York City, focusing on their early experiences of exploration and use of mobile location services and other tools for getting to know their new city. We describe their reasons and intentions behind exploratory practices using digital tools and emphasize how they make meaning out of new places in relation to technology tools as well as their previous places. Mobile location technologies make the process of finding specific places and exploring new neighborhoods a digital search task but discourage the notion of wandering and exploration. We point out missed opportunities for socio-technical systems supporting place making and place discovery and suggest that digital exploration tools should stay peripheral to the activities that people enjoy as tech-free but support a wider notion of search for salient characteristics of places.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brinkerhoff JM (2009) Digital Diasporas. Identity and Transnational Engagement. Cambridge University Press

  2. Lingel J, Naaman M and Boyd D (2014) City, self, network: transnational migrants and online identity work. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW ‘14). ACM, New York, 1502–1510

  3. Irina A. Shklovski and Scott D. Mainwaring (2005) Exploring technology adoption and use through the lens of residential mobility. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 621–630

  4. Nedelcu M (2012) Migrants’ new transnational habitus: rethinking migration through a cosmopolitan lens in the digital age. J Ethn Migr Stud:1339–1356

  5. Vertovec S (2004) Cheap calls: the social glue of migrant transnationalism. Global Networks 4:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Horst H and Miller D (2006) The cell phone: an anthropology of communication. Berg

  7. Panagakos AN (2009) From Napster to MEGA: power, gender, and generation in a Greek-Canadian community. Women, Gender, and Diasporic Lives: Labor, Community, and Identity in Greek Migrations 135

  8. Parham AA (2004) Diaspora, community and communication: Internet use in transnational Haiti. Global Networks 4(2):199–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bradley NA, Mark DD (2005) An experimental investigation into wayfinding directions for visually impaired people. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 9(6):395–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang Y-J, 2010 T-YW (December 2010) Comparing picture and video prompting in autonomous indoor wayfinding for individuals with cognitive impairments. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 14(8):737–747

  11. Gary LA (1999) Cognitive abilities in the service of wayfinding: a functional approach. Prof Geogr 51(4), Blackwell):555–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee H (2010) Mobile social networks and urban public space. New Media Soc 12(5):763–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cramer H, Rost M, Lars Erik Holmquist LE (2011) Performing a check-in: emerging practices, norms and ‘conflicts’ in location-sharing using foursquare. In: In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services ACM Press, New York, NY, pp 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  14. Evans L (2015) Being-Towards the social: mood and orientation to location-based social media, computational things and applications. In New Media & Society 17, 6, 2015, Sage, 845–860

  15. Luca M, Zervas G (2013) Fake it till you make it: reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper 14-006(2013)

  16. Hicks A, Comp S, Horovitz J, Hovarter M, Miki M, Jennifer LB (2012) Why people use Yelp. com: an exploration of uses and gratifications. Computers in Human Behavior 28(6):2274–2279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Simmel G (1903) The Metropolis and Mental Life. In Georg Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms. (Heritage of Sociology Series), Donald N. Levine (ed.), 1972. University of Chicago Press

  18. Casey ES (1993) Getting back into place. Towards a Renewed Understanding of the Place-World. Indiana University Press

  19. Harrison S and Dourish P (1996) Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM Press, New York, 67–76

  20. Lynch K (1960) The image of the city, vol 11. MIT press

  21. Milgram S (1976) Psychological maps of Paris. In: Environmental psychology: people and their physical settings, 2nd edn. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 104–124

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bentley F, Cramer H, Hamilton W, Basapur S (2012) Drawing the city: differing perceptions of the urban environment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, pp 1603–1606

    Google Scholar 

  23. Strauss A, Corbin JM (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications

  24. Lingel J (2015) Information practices of urban newcomers: An analysis of habits and wandering. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 66(6):1239–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Duneier M (2000) Sidewalk. Farrar, Straus and Giroux

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Vintage

  27. Diakopoulos N, De Choudhury M, 2012 MN Finding and assessing social media information sources in the context of journalism. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘12). ACM. USA, New York, NY, pp 2451–2460

  28. Ackerman MS (2000) The intellectual challenge of CSCW: the gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human–Computer Interaction 15.2–3 (2000), 179–203

  29. Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. In: Simon & Schuster

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the participants for their time. Also thanks to Mor Naaman and his research group at Cornell Tech for early insights and discussion around this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Louise Barkhuus

  2. New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, USA

    Donghee Yvette Wohn

Authors
  1. Louise Barkhuus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donghee Yvette Wohn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louise Barkhuus.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barkhuus, L., Wohn, D.Y. Making the city my own: uses and practices of mobile location technologies for exploration of a new city. Pers Ubiquit Comput 23, 269–278 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-01191-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-01191-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation