Advertisement

Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 689–704 | Cite as

An e-coaching ecosystem: design and effectiveness analysis of the engagement of remote coaching on athletes

  • Ludovico Boratto
  • Salvatore Carta
  • Fabrizio Mulas
  • Paolo Pilloni
Original

Abstract

Nowadays, the use of mobile applications and wearable technologies to support and encourage an active lifestyle has become widespread. Several studies put in evidence that the usage of these kinds of support has to be monitored by high-qualified figures, to favor a safe and a long-term adherence to training routines. In order to investigate the impact of these professionals, this work sets out to provide an overview and an evaluation of an e-coaching ecosystem specifically designed for runners. The platform supports and guides people towards an active lifestyle by stimulating their motivation to exercise through the engagement provided by the interactions between users and human trainers. In this study, we investigate the effectiveness of the support offered by the human trainers and the engagement of the users. The results show that the support of human qualified trainers is crucial. Users tend to be more engaged to train when their trainings are developed and remotely supervised by a human coach. This has resulted in more workout sessions performed with respect to users exercising by following standard or self-made routines without direct professional supervision. Our findings show that e-coaching systems should develop their coaching protocols always taking into account the effectiveness of the support of qualified professionals over completely automated approaches.

Keywords

e-coaching Persuasive technology Physical activity Running Healthy lifestyle Human coach Motivation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Alessio Demurtas, Marika Cappai, Luca Mancosu, Giordano Sini, and Stefano Amico for their contribution in this research work and the reviewers for their invaluable suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    Endomondo. www.endomondo.com. Accessed: 2016-05-14
  2. 2.
    Mapmyfitness. www.mapmyfitness.com. Accessed: 2016-05-14
  3. 3.
    micoach. www.adidas.com/fi/micoach. Accessed: 2016-05-14
  4. 4.
    Runkeeper. runkeeper.com. Accessed: 2016-05-14
  5. 5.
    Runtastic. www.runtastic.com. Accessed: 2016-05-14
  6. 6.
    Nike+gps. http://nikerunning.nike.com. Accessed: 2016-05-14
  7. 7.
    (2016) Your shape: Fitness evolved. http://your-shape-fitness-evolved.ubi.com/2012/. Accessed: 2016-05-14
  8. 8.
    Ahtinen A, Isomursu M, Huhtala Y, Kaasinen J, Salminen J, Häkkilä J (2008) Tracking outdoor sports—user experience perspective. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aymerich FM, Fenu G, Surcis S (2009) A real time financial system based on grid and cloud computing. ACM, New York, NY, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berkovsky S, Coombe M, Freyne J, Bhandari D, Baghaei N (2010) Physical activity motivating games: virtual rewards for real activity Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, pp 243–252Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chou CJ, Conley C (2009) Engaging experience: a new perspective of user experience with physical products. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Consolvo S, Everitt K, Smith I, Landay JA (2006) Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’06, pp. 457–466. ACM, New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1145/1124772.1124840
  13. 13.
    Consolvo S, Klasnja P, McDonald DW, Landay JA (2009) Goal-setting considerations for persuasive technologies that encourage physical activity Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Persuasive ’09. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 8:1–8:8Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fialho AT, van den Heuvel H, Shahab Q, Liu Q, Li L, Saini P, Lacroix J, Markopoulos P (2009) Activeshare: Sharing challenges to increase physical activities. ACM, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garibotto G, Murrieri P, Capra A, Muro SD, Petillo U, Flammini F, Esposito M, Pragliola C, Leo GD, Lengu R, Mazzino N, Paolillo A, D’Urso M, Vertucci R, Narducci F, Ricciardi S, Casanova A, Fenu G, Mizio MD, Savastano M, Capua MD, Ferone A (2013) White paper on industrial applications of computer vision and pattern recognition. In: Petrosino A. (ed) Image analysis and processing - ICIAP 2013 - 17th International Conference, Naples, Italy, September 9-13, 2013, Proceedings, Part II, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8157. Springer, pp 721– 730Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hamari J, Koivisto J (2013) Social motivations to use gamification: an empirical study of gamifying exercise 21st European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2013, Utrecht, The Netherlands, June 5-8, 2013, p 105Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    IJsselsteijn W, de Kort Y, Westerink JHDM, de Jager M, Bonants R (2004) Fun and sports: enhancing the home fitness experience. In: Rauterberg M. (ed) Entertainment computing - ICEC 2004, Third International Conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, September 1-3, 2004, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3166. Springer, pp 46–56Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jayant R, Saponas TS (2005) Mariofit: exercise through mobile entertainment. Tech. rep., University of Washington, Seattle WAGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    King AC, Hekler EB, Grieco LA, Winter SJ, Sheats JL, Buman MP, Banerjee B, Robinson TN, Cirimele J (2013) Harnessing different motivational frames via mobile phones to promote daily physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior in aging adults. PLoS One 8(4):e62,613. http://www.biomedsearch.com/nih/Harnessing-Different-Motivational-Frames-via/23638127.html
  20. 20.
    Kuru A, Forlizzi J (2015) Engaging experience with physical activity tracking products Design, user experience, and usability: design discourse. Springer, pp 490–501Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mayo E (1949) Hawthorne and the Western Electric Company, the social problems of an industrial civilisation RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mueller FF, Vetere F, Gibbs MR, Agamanolis S, Sheridan J (2010) Jogging over a distance: the influence of design in parallel exertion games Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games, Sandbox ’10. doi: 10.1145/1836135.1836145. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 63–68
  23. 23.
    Mulas F, Acquaviva A, Carta S, Fenu G, Quaglia D, Fummi F (2010) Network-adaptive management of computation energy in wireless sensor networks. ACM, New York, NY, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mulas F, Carta S, Pilloni P, Boratto L (2013) Everywhere run: a virtual personal trainer for supporting people in their running activity. Int J Adv Comput Sci 3(2):75–79Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mulas F, Carta S, Pilloni P, Manca M (2011) Everywhere run: a virtual personal trainer for supporting people in their running activity Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, ACE ’11. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 70:1–70:2, doi: 10.1145/2071423.2071510 , (to appear in print)
  26. 26.
    O’Brien HL, Toms EG (2008) What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 59(6):938–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    de Oliveira R, Oliver N (2008) Triplebeat: enhancing exercise performance with persuasion Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, MobileHCI ’08. doi: 10.1145/1409240.1409268. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 255–264
  28. 28.
    Orji R, Moffatt K (2016) Persuasive technology for health and wellness: state-of-the-art and emerging trends. Health Informatics Journal 1–26Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Overbeeke K, Djajadiningrat T, Hummels C, Wensveen S, Frens J (2004) Funology. chap. Let’s make things engaging, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, USA. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1139008.1139013
  30. 30.
    Toscos T, Faber A, An S, Gandhi MP (2006) Chick clique: persuasive technology to motivate teenage girls to exercise CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’06. doi: 10.1145/1125451.1125805. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 1873–1878

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ludovico Boratto
    • 1
    • 2
  • Salvatore Carta
    • 1
  • Fabrizio Mulas
    • 1
  • Paolo Pilloni
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Matematica e InformaticaUniversità di CagliariCagliariItaly
  2. 2.Digital Humanities - EurecatBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations