Shared mobile displays: an exploratory study of their use in a museum setting

Abstract

We conducted an exploratory study that examines the use of shared mobile displays such as mobile projectors and tablets to support group activities. We compare how a small group of visitors use either a shared display or personal individual devices in a museum visit context, in both a navigation task and a media viewing task. Group proximity, decision making, leadership patterns, and interaction between group members as well as attitudes are analyzed. We report on various usage patterns observed with group use of shared displays and discuss user preferences in comparison with the non-shared handheld alternative. Results show how mobile shared displays can support and enhance the group experience, by providing a shared mobile environment. Mobile shared displays increase group cohesiveness as was shown by increased proximity and amount of discussion by participants. Users perceive the use of shared displays as both useful and enjoyable, with the caveat that many users still want to retain individual control. We discuss this trade-off between groupness and individual control, as well as provide an analysis of the relative advantages of each shared display option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://mushecht.haifa.ac.il/Default_eng.aspx.

  2. 2.

    www.discovertext.com.

References

  1. 1.

    Stewart J, Bederson BB, Druin A (1999) Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 286–293

  2. 2.

    Greenberg S, Boyle M, LaBerge J (1999) PDAs and shared public displays: making personal information public, and public information personal. Pers Ubiquit Comput 3:54–64

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Izadi S, Brignull H, Rodden T, Rogers Y, Underwood M (2003) Dynamo: a public interactive surface supporting the cooperative sharing and exchange of media. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, pp 159–168

  4. 4.

    Peltonen P, Kurvinen E, Salovaara A, Jacucci G, Ilmonen T, Evans J, Oulasvirta A, Saarikko P (2008) It’s Mine, Don’t Touch!: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1285–1294

  5. 5.

    Cole H, Stanton D (2003) Designing mobile technologies to support co-present collaboration. Pers Ubiquit Comput 7:365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Falk JH (2009) Identity and the museum visitor experience. Left Coast Press Walnut Creek, CA

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wallace JR, Scott SD, Stutz T, Enns T, Inkpen K (2009) Investigating teamwork and taskwork in single-and multi-display groupware systems. Pers Ubiquit Comput 13:569–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Liu CC, Kao LC (2007) Do handheld devices facilitate face-to-face collaboration? Handheld devices with large shared display groupware to facilitate group interactions. J Comput Assisted Learn 23:285–299

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lundgren S, Fischer JE, Reeves S, Torgersson O (2015) Designing mobile experiences for collocated interaction. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing, pp 496–507

  10. 10.

    Lucero A, Holopainen J, Jokela T (2012) MobiComics: collaborative use of mobile phones and large displays for public expression. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on human–computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pp 383–392

  11. 11.

    Lucero A, Holopainen J, Jokela T (2011) Pass-them-around: collaborative use of mobile phones for photo sharing. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1787–1796

  12. 12.

    Ah Kun LM, Marsden G (2007) Co-present photo sharing on mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pp 277–284

  13. 13.

    Patel N, Clawson J, Voida A, Lyons K (2009) Mobiphos: a study of user engagement with a mobile collocated-synchronous photo sharing application. Int J Hum Comput Stud 67:1048–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lucero A, Keränen J, Korhonen H (2010) Collaborative use of mobile phones for brainstorming. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on human–computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pp 337–340

  15. 15.

    Rekimoto J, Ayatsuka Y, Kohno M (2003) SyncTap: An interaction technique for mobile networking. In: Human–computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pp 104–115

  16. 16.

    Hinckley K (2003) Synchronous gestures for multiple persons and computers. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, pp 149–158

  17. 17.

    Willis KDD (2011) A pre-history of handheld projector-based interaction. Pers Ubiquit Comput 16:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rukzio E, Holleis P, Gellersen H (2011) Personal projectors for pervasive computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput 2:30–37

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Winkler C, Seifert J, Dobbelstein D, Rukzio E (2014) Pervasive information through constant personal projection: the ambient mobile pervasive display (AMP-D). In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 4117–4126

  20. 20.

    Cao X, Forlines C, Balakrishnan R (2007) Multi-user interaction using handheld projectors. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, pp 43–52

  21. 21.

    Greaves A, Hang A, Rukzio E (2008) Picture browsing and map interaction using a projector phone. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pp 527–530

  22. 22.

    Greaves A, Rukzio E (2009) View and share: supporting co-present viewing and sharing of media using personal projection. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on human–computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pp 1–4

  23. 23.

    Kawsar F, Rukzio E, Kortuem G (2010) An explorative comparison of magic lens and personal projection for interacting with smart objects. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on human–computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pp 157-160

  24. 24.

    Mathur A, Ramachandran D, Cutrell E, Balakrishnan R (2011) An exploratory study on the use of camera phones and pico projectors in rural India. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on human–computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pp 347–356

  25. 25.

    Greaves A, Akerman P, Rukzio E, Cheverst K, Hakkila J (2009) Exploring user reaction to personal projection when used in shared public places: a formative study. In: CAM3SN Workshop at MobileHCI

  26. 26.

    Cao X (2009) Handheld projector interaction. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto

  27. 27.

    Buxton W, Hill R, Rowley P (1985) Issues and techniques in touch-sensitive tablet input. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput Graph 19:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Halpern S (2010) The iPad revolution. New York Review of Books 57

  29. 29.

    Pearson J, Buchanan G (2010) Real-time document collaboration using iPads. In: Proceedings of the third workshop on research advances in large digital book repositories and complementary media, pp 9–14

  30. 30.

    Olwal A, Frykholm O, Groth K, Moll J (2011) Design and evaluation of interaction technology for medical team meetings. In: Human–computer interaction–INTERACT, pp 505–522

  31. 31.

    Issacson A, Mcguire S, Sayre S, Wetterlund K (2011) Enhancing group tours with the iPad: a case study. In: Proctor N (ed) Mobile apps for museums: the AAM guide to planning and strategy. The AAM Press, Washington, p 89

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Leinhardt G, Knutson K (2004) Listening in on museum conversations. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bitgood S, Shettel HH (1996) An overview of visitor studies. J Mus Educ 21:6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kuflik T, Stock O, Zancanaro M, Gorfinkel A, Jbara S, Kats S, Sheidin J, Kashtan N (2011) A visitor’s guide in an active museum: presentations, communications, and reflection. J Comput Cult Herit (JOCCH) 3:11

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Stock O, Zancanaro M, Busetta P, Callaway C, Krüger A, Kruppa M, Kuflik T, Not E, Rocchi C (2007) Adaptive, intelligent presentation of information for the museum visitor in PEACH. User Model User-Adap Interact 17:257–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Abowd GD, Atkeson CG, Hong J, Long S, Kooper R, Pinkerton M (1997) Cyberguide: a mobile context-aware tour guide. Wirel Netw 3:421–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Cheverst K, Davies N, Mitchell K, Friday A (2000) Experiences of developing and deploying a context-aware tourist guide: the GUIDE project. In: Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, pp 20–31

  38. 38.

    Lanir J, Kuflik T, Dim E, Wecker AJ, Stock O (2013) The influence of a location-aware mobile guide on museum visitors’ behavior. Interact Comput 25:443–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Aoki PM, Grinter RE, Hurst A, Szymanski MH, Thornton JD, Woodruff A (2002) Sotto voce: exploring the interplay of conversation and mobile audio spaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp 431–438

  40. 40.

    Suh Y, Shin C, Woo W, Dow S, MacIntyre B (2011) Enhancing and evaluating users’ social experience with a mobile phone guide applied to cultural heritage. Pers Ubiquit Comput 15:649–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Fosh L, Benford S, Reeves S, Koleva B, Brundell P (2013) See me, feel me, touch me, hear me: trajectories and interpretation in a sculpture garden. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 149–158

  42. 42.

    Luyten K, Van Loon H, Teunkens D, Gabriëls K, Coninx K, Manshoven E (2006) ARCHIE: disclosing a museum by a socially-aware mobile guide. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on virtual reality, archaeology and cultural heritage, pp 221–226

  43. 43.

    Ghiani G, Paternņ F, Santoro C, Spano LD (2009) UbiCicero: a location-aware, multi-device museum guide. Interact Comput 21:288–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Sumi Y, Mase K (2001) AgentSalon: facilitating face-to-face knowledge exchange through conversations among personal agents. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on autonomous agents, pp 393–400

  45. 45.

    Dini R, Paternò F, Santoro C (2007) An environment to support multi-user interaction and cooperation for improving museum visits through games. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pp 515–521

  46. 46.

    Callaway C, Stock O, Dekoven E, Noy K, Citron Y, Dobrin Y (2012) Mobile drama in an instrumented museum: inducing group conversation via coordinated narratives. New Rev Hypermedia Multimed 18:37–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kuflik T, Lanir J, Dim E, Wecker A, Corra M, Zancanaro M, Stock O (2011) Indoor positioning: challenges and solutions for indoor cultural heritage sites. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on intelligent user interfaces, pp 375–378

  48. 48.

    Reilly D, Mackay B, Watters C, Inkpen K (2009) Planners, navigators, and pragmatists: collaborative wayfinding using a single mobile phone. Pers Ubiquit Comput 13:321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Mendoza V, Novick DG (2005) Usability over time. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual international conference on design of communication: documenting and designing for pervasive information, pp 151–158

  50. 50.

    Tullis T, Albert W (2008) Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    DiMicco JM, Pandolfo A, Bender W (2004) Influencing group participation with a shared display. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, pp 614–623

  52. 52.

    Rogers Y, Lindley S (2004) Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? Interact Comput 16:1133–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bekker MM, Olson JS, Olson GM (1995) Analysis of gestures in face-to-face design teams provides guidance for how to use groupware in design. In: Proceedings of the 1st conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pp 157–166

  54. 54.

    Beardsley P, Van Baar J, Raskar R, Forlines C (2005) Interaction using a handheld projector. Comput Graph Appl 25:39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Dawes J (2008) Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5 point, 7 point and 10 point scales. Int J Mark Res 50(1):61–104

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Lanir J, Kuflik T, Wecker AJ, Stock O, Zancanaro M (2011) Examining proactiveness and choice in a location-aware mobile museum guide. Interact Comput 23:513–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Shneiderman B, Plaisant C (2009) Designing the user interface. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Dalsgaard P, Halskov K (2011) 3D projection on physical objects: design insights from five real life cases. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1041–1050

  59. 59.

    Möller A, Kranz M, Huitl R, Diewald S, Roalter L (2012) A mobile indoor navigation system interface adapted to vision-based localization. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia

  60. 60.

    Cooper A (1999) The inmates are running the asylum: [Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity]. Sams Indianapolis

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the collaboration project between the Caesarea-Rothschild Institute at the University of Haifa and FBK/irst and by FIRB Project RBIN045PXH and by the Israeli Science Foundation Grant ISF 226/10.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Lanir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lanir, J., Wecker, A.J., Kuflik, T. et al. Shared mobile displays: an exploratory study of their use in a museum setting. Pers Ubiquit Comput 20, 635–651 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0931-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Shared mobile display
  • Co-located group
  • Mobile projector
  • Tablet
  • Museum