Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 19, Issue 7, pp 1215–1228 | Cite as

Companion apps for information-rich television programmes: representation and interaction

  • John Dowell
  • Sylvain Malacria
  • Hana Kim
  • Edward Anstead
Original Article

Abstract

The use of a companion app to augment viewing of information-rich television programmes is investigated. The app displays a synchronised graphical abstraction of a programme’s content in the form of a concept map. Two experiments were conducted involving participants watching an astronomy documentary with the app. The first compared watching the programme with and without the app, and the second compared non-interactive and interactive versions of the app. Understanding of the programme, cross-device gaze behaviour, and user experience of the app were assessed. Our results show that the companion app improved participants’ understanding and recall of the programme. Participants were found to manage their visual attention systematically when using the companion app, and correlations were found in the way they shifted their gaze from TV screen to tablet and back in response to changes in the programme content. Increasing interaction with the app disrupted understanding of the television programme and visual attention. Participants were positive about the value of companion apps for understanding and recall of programmes, but distraction and ‘knowing where to look’ were significant concerns.

Keywords

Television companion apps Science learning Multi-screen interaction Visual attention 

References

  1. 1.
    Adesope OO, Nesbit JC (2013) Animated and static concept maps enhance learning from spoken narration. Learn Instr 27:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson D, Alwitt L, Lorch E, Levin S (1979) Watching children watch television. In: Hale C, Lewis M (eds) Attention and cognitive development. Plenum, New York, pp 331–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basapur S, Harboe G, Mandalia H, Novak A, Vuong V, Metcalf C (2011) Field trial of a dual device user experience for iTV. In: Proceedings of EuroITV’11 ACMGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basapur S, Mandalia H, Chaysinh S, Lee Y, Venkitaraman N, Metcalf C (2012) FANFEEDS: evaluation of socially generated information feed on second screen as a TV show companion. In: Proceedings of EuroiTV’12 ACMGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Basil M (1994) Multiple resource theory 1: application to television viewing. Commun Res 21(2):177–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    BBC (2012) The frozen planet dual screen experience. http://companion.prototype0.net/examples/frozen-planet-companion-2012. Accessed 17 June 2015
  7. 7.
    Blankenship J, Dansereau DF (2000) The effect of animated node-link displays on information recall. J Exp Educ 68(4):293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brooke J (1996) SUS—a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan P, Thomas B, Weerdmeester B, McClelland (eds) Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown A, Glancy M, Evans M, Jones R, Jay C, Harper S (2014) HCI over multiple screens. In: CHI ‘14 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp 665–674Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bruce F (2014) Antiques roadshow to launch BBC’s first ever smartphone companion app. http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/latestnews/2013/antiques-roadshow-app.html. Accessed 17 June 2015
  11. 11.
    Burns J, Anderson D (1993) Attentional inertia and recognition memory in adult television memory. Commun Res 20(6):777–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cañas A, Hill G, Carff R, Suri N, Lott J, Eskridge T, Gomez G, Arroyo M, Carvajal R (2004). CmapTools: a knowledge modeling and sharing environment. In: Concept maps: theory, methodology, technology proceedings of the first international conference on concept mapping, 1, 125–133Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cesar P, Bulterman DCA, Jansen AJ (2008) Usages of the secondary screen in an interactive television environment: control, enrich, share, and transfer television content. Chang Telev Environ 5066:168–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Collins W (1982) Cognitive processing in television viewing. In: Pearl P, Bouthilet L, Lazar J (eds) Television and behaviour: ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties. National Institute of Mental Health, USA, pp 9–23Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Courtois C, D’heer E (2012) Second screen applications and tablet users: constellation, awareness, experience, and interest. In: Proceedings of EuroiTV’12 ACMGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cruickshank L, Tsekleves E, Whitham R, Hill A, Kondo K (2007) Making interactive TV easier to use: interface design for a second screen approach. Des J 10(3):41–53Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doughty M, Rowland D, Lawson S (2012) Who is on your sofa? TV audience communities and second screening social networks. In: Proceedings of EuroiTV’12 ACMGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fallahkhair S, Pemberton L, Griffiths R (2005) Dual device user interface design for ubiquitous language learning: mobile phone and interactive television (iTV). In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on wireless and mobile technologies in education IEEEGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Geerts D, Leenheer R, De Grooff D, Negenman J, Heijstraten S (2014) In front of and behind the second screen: viewer and producer perspectives on a companion app. In: Proceedings of TVX’14 ACMGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hawkins R, Pingree S, Bruce L, Tapper J (1997) Strategy and style in attention to television. J Broadcast Electron Media 4:245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hawkins R, Pingree S, Hitchon J, Radler B, Gorham B, Kahlor L, Gilligan E, Serlin R, Schmidt T, Kannaovakun P, Kolbeins G (2005) What produces television attention and attention style? Genre, situation, and individual differences as predictors. Hum Commun Res 31(1):162–187Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holmes M, Josephosn S, Carney R (2012) Visual attention to television programs with a second-screen application. In: Proceedings of the symposium on eye tracking research and applications, pp 397–400Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huston A, Wright J (1983) Children’s processing of television: the informative functions of formal features. In: Bryant J, Anderson D (eds) Children’s understanding of television. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–65Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jones T (2011) Designing for second screens: the autumnwatch companion. BBC. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/researchanddevelopment/2011/04/the-autumnwatch-companion—de.shtml. Accessed 17 June 2015
  25. 25.
    Klein J, Freeman J, Harding D, Teffahi A (2014) Assessing the impact of second screen. OfcomGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lochrie M, Coulton P (2012) Sharing the viewing experience through second screens. In: Proceedings of EuroiTV’12 ACMGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moulding J (2012) BBC reveals companion screen app strategy. http://www.v-net.tv/bbc-reveals-companion-screen-app-strategy. Accessed 17 June 2015
  28. 28.
    Nandakumar A, Murray J (2014) Companion apps for long arc TV series: supporting new viewers in complex storyworlds with tightly synchronized context-sensitive annotations. In: Proceedings of TVX’14 ACMGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Neate T, Jones M, Evans M (2015) Mediating attention for second screen companion content. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 3103–3106Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nesbit J, Adesope O (2006) Learning with concept and knowledge maps: a meta-analysis. Rev Educat Res 76(3):413–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nesbit J, Adesope O (2011) Learning from animated concept maps with concurrent audio narration. J Exp Educ 79:209–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Novak J (1990) Concept mapping: a useful tool for science education. J Res Sci Teach 27(10):937–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Park J, Blythe M, Monk A, Grayson D (2006) Sharable digital TV: relating ethnography to design through un-useless product suggestions. In: Proceedings of CHI’06 extended abstracts ACMGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Robertson S, Wharton C, Ashworth C, Franzke M (1996) Dual device user interface design: PDAs and interactive television. In: Proceedings of the CHI’96 ACMGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Van Dijk J, Vos L (2001) Searching for the holy grail. New Media Soc 4(3):443–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vatavu R-D, Mancas M (2014) Visual attention measures for multi-screen TV. In: Proceedings of TVX’14 ACMGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Dowell
    • 1
  • Sylvain Malacria
    • 2
  • Hana Kim
    • 1
  • Edward Anstead
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.InriaLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations