Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 367–378

Cell phone ownership and use among mental health outpatients in the USA

  • Brianne Campbell
  • Kelly Caine
  • Kay Connelly
  • Tom Doub
  • April Bragg
Original Article

Abstract

Cell phone technology is in the hands of millions of Americans, and early research indicates that this technology can be useful to help Americans who are suffering from some form of mental illness. Like with the design of any technology from a human-centered perspective, we aim to determine how to best utilize technology so that it is both easy to use and works for its intended purpose. To accomplish this, we surveyed 325 patients currently receiving treatment at community-based outpatient clinics for mental illness to determine their cell phone ownership and usage patterns. Our results showed that cell phone ownership among these mental health patients was comparable with ownership among a nationally representative sample, with the exception that more patients than non-patients shared their mobile phones. Among mental health patients, we found that texting was the most popular feature used and downloading apps was the least popular. Based on these results, we concluded that texting may be a feasible form of treatment aid for those with mental illness and may be useful as a supplementary treatment for those with low income or little to no access to treatment. Further research should investigate privacy measures for using mobile technology as a treatment aid, especially for those who share a phone, and explore the types of mHealth treatment aids that could be the most effective.

Keywords

Cell phones Mental illness Mobile technology Health technology mHealth 

References

  1. 1.
    Smith A (2011) Americans and their cell phones. Pew Internet Am Life Proj. http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/08/15/americans-and-their-cell-phones/. Accessed 1 Jan 2014
  2. 2.
    Duggan M (2013) Cell phone activities 2013. Pew Internet Am Life Proj. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/09/19/cell-phone-activities-2013/. Accessed 1 Jan 2014
  3. 3.
    Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE (2005) Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch General Psychiatry 62(6):617–627. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration (2012) Mental health, United States, 2010. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arsand E, Tufano JT, Ralston JD, Hjortdahl P (2008) Designing mobile dietary management support technologies for people with diabetes. J Telemed Telecare 14(7):329–332. doi:10.1258/jtt.2008.007001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith SA, Shah ND, Bryant SC, Christianson TJ, Bjornsen SS, Giesler PD, Krause K, Erwin PJ, Montori VM, Evidens Research Group (2008) Chronic care model and shared care in diabetes: randomized trial of an electronic decision support system. Mayo Clin Proc 83(7):747–757. doi:10.4065/83.7.747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siek KA, Ross SE, Khan DU, Haverhals LM, Cali SR, Meyers J (2010) Colorado care tablet: the design of an interoperable Personal Health Application to help older adults with multimorbidity manage their medications. J Biomed Inform 43(5 Suppl):S22–S26. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2010.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caine K, Zimmerman C, Schall-Zimmerman Z et al (2010) DigiSwitch: design and evaluation of a device for older adults to preserve privacy while monitoring health at home. In: Proceedings of IHI, pp 153–162Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abernethy AP, Ahmad A, Zafar SY, Wheeler JL, Reese JB, Lyerly HK (2010) Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care. Med Care 48(6 Suppl):S32–S38. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181db53a4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Junnila S, Kailanto H, Merilahti J, Vainio AM, Vehkaoja A, Zakrzewski M, Hyttinen J (2010) Wireless, multipurpose in-home health monitoring platform: two case trials. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed Publ IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 14(2):447–455. doi:10.1109/TITB.2009.2037615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee G, Tsai C, Griswold W, Raab F, Acken K (2006) PmEB: a mobile phone application for monitoring caloric balance. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp 1013–1018Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsai CC, Lee G, Raab F et al (2006) Usability and feasibility of PmEB: a mobile phone application for monitoring real time caloric balance. In: Pervasive health conference and workshops. IEEE, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cook IA, Balasubramani GK, Eng H, Friedman E, Young EA, Martin J, Nay WT, Ritz L, Rush AJ, Stegman D, Warden D, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR (2007) Electronic source materials in clinical research: acceptability and validity of symptom self-rating in major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res 41(9):737–743. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.07.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schenk AK, Witbrodt BC, Hoarty CA, Carlson RH Jr, Goulding EH, Potter JF, Bonasera SJ (2011) Cellular telephones measure activity and lifespace in community-dwelling adults: proof of principle. J Am Geriatr Soc 59(2):345–352. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03267.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Consolvo S, Klasnja P, McDonald DW et al (2008) Flowers or a robot army? Encouraging awareness and activity with personal, mobile displays. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on ubiquitous computing, pp 54–63Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frost J, Smith BK (2003) Visualizing health: imagery in diabetes education. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on designing for user experiences, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krishna S, Boren SA, Balas EA (2009) Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review. Telemed J e-Health Off J Am Telemed Assoc 15(3):231–240. doi:10.1089/tmj.2008.0099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    National Institutes of Health Innovative Mobile and Wireless Technologies (mHealth) to Improve Health Research and Health Outcomes. http://commonfund.nih.gov/InnovationBrainstorm/post/Innovative-Mobile-and-Wireless-Technologies-(mHealth)-to-Improve-Health-Research-and-Health-Outcomes.aspx. Accessed 1 Dec 2011
  20. 20.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ (2006) Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 13(2):121–126. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wynia M, Dunn K (2010) Dreams and nightmares: practical and ethical issues for patients and physicians using personal health records. J Law Med Ethics J Am Soc Law Med Ethics 38(1):64–73. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00467.x Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Agarwal RAC, Crowley K, Kannon P (2011) Improving consumer health IT application development: lessons from other industries: background report. Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mohr DC, Duffecy J, Jin L, Ludman EJ, Lewis A, Begale M, McCarthy M Jr (2010) Multimodal e-mental health treatment for depression: a feasibility trial. J Med Internet Res 12(5):e48. doi:10.2196/jmir.1370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morris ME, Kathawala Q, Leen TK, Gorenstein EE, Guilak F, Labhard M, Deleeuw W (2010) Mobile therapy: case study evaluations of a cell phone application for emotional self-awareness. J Med Internet Res 12(2):e10. doi:10.2196/jmir.1371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Proudfoot J, Parker G, Hadzi Pavlovic D, Manicavasagar V, Adler E, Whitton A (2010) Community attitudes to the appropriation of mobile phones for monitoring and managing depression, anxiety, and stress. J Med Internet Res 12(5):e64. doi:10.2196/jmir.1475 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, McTavish F, Owens B, Wise M, Berhe H, Pingree S (2002) CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved. Int J Med Informatics 65(3):169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith A (2010) Americans and their gadgets. Pew Internet Am Life Proj. http://www.pewinternet.org/2010/10/14/americans-and-their-gadgets/. Accessed 1 Jan 2014
  29. 29.
    Regier DA, Narrow WE, Rae DS, Manderscheid RW, Locke BZ, Goodwin FK (1993) The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system. Epidemiologic catchment area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Arch General Psychiatry 50(2):85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Table 2: Annual estimates of the population by selected age groups and sex for the United States: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2004 (NC-EST2004-02) (2005). U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates by Demographic Characteristics. Population Division, U.S. Census BureauGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Peytchev A, Carley-Baxter LR, Black MC (2010) Coverage bias in variances, associations, and total error from exclusion of the cell phone-only population in the United States. Soc Sci Comput Rev 28(3):287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Evans et al (2012) Pilot evaluation of the text4baby mobile health program. BMC Public Health 12:1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Text4Baby, About. https://www.text4baby.org/index.php/about. Accessed 26 June 2014
  34. 34.
    Katz JE, Aakhus MA (2002) Making meaning of mobiles: a theory of apparatgeist. Perpetual contact: mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    White G, Caine K, Connelly K, Selove R, Doub T (2014) Designing consumer health technologies for the treatment of patients with depression: a health practitioner’s perspective. Interact J Med Res 3(1):e2. doi:10.2196/ijmr.2368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Peytchev A, Carley-Baxter LR, Black MC (2010) Comparison of cell phone and landline surveys: a design perspective. Field Methods 22(1):3–15. doi:10.1177/1525822X09360310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bell G (2005) The age of the thumb: a cultural reading of mobile technologies from Asia. In: Glotz P, Bertschi S, Locke C (eds) Thumb culture—the meaning of mobile phones for society. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, pp 67–88Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chavan AL (2007) A dramatic day in the life of a shared Indian mobile phone. In Usability and internationalization. In: Aykin NM (ed) HCI and culture, proceedings of the second international conference on usability and internationalization, UI-HCII, Beijing, China, 22–27 July 2007. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Donner J (2008) Research approaches to mobile use in the developing world: a review of the literature. Inf Soc 24(3):140–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    James J, Versteeg M (2007) Mobile phones in Africa: how much do we really know? Soc Indic Res 84(1):117–126. doi:10.1007/s11205-006-9079-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brianne Campbell
    • 1
  • Kelly Caine
    • 1
  • Kay Connelly
    • 2
  • Tom Doub
    • 3
  • April Bragg
    • 3
  1. 1.School of ComputingClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  2. 2.School of Informatics and ComputingIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.Centerstone Research InstituteNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations