Skip to main content

House rules: the collaborative nature of policy in domestic networks

Abstract

We draw on ethnographic studies to understand the collaborative nature of network policies or rules in domestic settings. We outline the technical nature of network policy in enterprise domains and how this contrasts with the social or collaborative nature of rules in everyday life. We then consider the deployment of network control and policy system interfaces in domestic settings, highlighting the ways in which household members collaboratively exploited these to support network governance. Our results suggest that an important feature of network policy in domestic contexts is that rules about network activity are shaped by and answerable to the moral reasoning that governs domestic life. This reframes our understanding of how rules are oriented to and used in the home and has significant implications for the design of home network policy systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Bauer L, Cranor L, Reiter M, Vaniea K (2007) Lessons learned from the deployment of a smartphone-based access-control system, Proc. of SOUPS. ACM, Pittsburgh, pp 64–75

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bittner E (1965) The concept of organisation. Social Research 32:230–255

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Brundell P et al (2011) The network from above and below, Proc. of SIGCOMM W-MUST. ACM, Toronto, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chetty M et al (2010) Who’s hogging the bandwidth? Proc. of CHI. ACM, Atlanta, pp 659–668

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Crabtree A et al (2012) Unremarkable networking, Proc. of DIS. ACM, Newcastle, pp 554–563

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Durkheim E (1933) The division of labour in society. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Feamster N, Balakrishnan H (2005) Detecting BGP configuration faults with static analysis, Proc. of the 2nd NSDI Symposium. USENIX, Boston, pp 43–56

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Grinter R, et al. (2009) The ins and outs of home networking, ACM ToCHI, 16 (2), Article No. 8

  9. 9.

    Hilbert R (1992) The status of rules in moral life, the classical roots of ethnomethodology. University of North Carolina Press, North Carolina, pp 27–45

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hughes J et al (1994) Moving out of the control room, Proc. of CSCW. ACM, Chapel Hill, pp 429–438

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hutchinson H et al (2003) Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families, Proc. of CHI. ACM, Fort Lauderdale, pp 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mortier R et al (2012) Homework: putting interaction into the infrastructure, Proc. of UIST. ACM, Cambridge, pp 197–206

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Randall D, Harper R, Rouncefield M (2007) Fieldwork for design: theory and practice. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rawls A (2002) Editor’s introduction, ethnomethodology’s program. Rowman & Littlefield, New York, pp 1–64

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Rodden T et al (2009) Homebase, Proc. of CHI, Workshop on home behaviour datasets. ACM, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tolmie P et al (2007) Digital housekeeping, Proc. of ECSCW. Springer, Limerick, pp 331–350

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tolmie P, Crabtree A (2008) Deploying research technology in the home, Proc. of CSCW. ACM, New York, pp 639–648

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wieder DL (1974) Language and social reality. Mouton & Co, The Hague

  19. 19.

    Yang J, Edwards K, Haslem D (2010) Eden, Proc. of UIST. ACM, New York, pp 109–118

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    W3 policy language review, www.w3.org/Policy/pling/wiki/PolicyLangReview

  21. 21.

    Zimmerman D (1970) The practicalities of rule use. In: Douglas JD (ed) Understanding everyday life. Aldine Publishing Co, Chicago, pp 221–238

Download references

Acknowledgments

RCUK EP/F064276/1, EP/F064225/1, EP/F064446/1.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andy Crabtree.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Tolmie, P. et al. House rules: the collaborative nature of policy in domestic networks. Pers Ubiquit Comput 19, 203–215 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0771-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Home networks
  • Network policy and rules
  • Moral order
  • Collaborative interfaces
  • Ethnography