When noise becomes voice: designing interactive technology for crowd experiences through imitation and invention

Abstract

In this paper, we present crowd experience as a novel concept when designing interactive technology for spectator crowds in public settings. Technology-mediated experiences in groups have already been given serious attention in the field of interaction design. However, crowd experiences are distinctive because of the spontaneous, uninhibited behavior exhibited. In crowds, extreme sociality and the experience of performing identity in public emerge spontaneously. By bridging crowd theory and pragmatics of experience, we establish an understanding of crowd experience as a distinct sociality within interaction design that unfolds through imitation and invention. We deploy that understanding in an exploration of spectator experiences at three football matches in which an experimental prototype, BannerBattle, was deployed. BannerBattle is an interactive banner on which spectators can grab space in competition with their rivals. The more noise and movement they make, the more screen real estate they gain. BannerBattle therefore enabled us to explore the emergence of imitative and at times inventive behavior in enriched crowd experience, by augmenting and supporting spectator performance in this way. We discuss the value of a conceptual understanding of crowd experience for technology as an unexplored potential for designing new interactive technology at spectator venues.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tifos are collectively choreographed mosaics often made of several 100s of colored flags carried by the spectator crowd.

  2. 2.

    See Veerasawmy and Iversen [60] for more discussions on BannerBattle and an introduction of crowd theory into interaction design.

  3. 3.

    http://www.interactivespaces.net.

References

  1. 1.

    Rogers Y, Lindley S (2004) Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? Interact Comput 16:1133–1152. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2004.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Grudin J (1994) Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Commun ACM 10(1145/175222):175230

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Stewart J, Bederson BB, Druin A (1999) Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration. In: Proceedings of the CHI ‘99. ACM Press, New York, pp 286–293

  4. 4.

    Carroll JM (2012) The neighborhood in the internet: design research projects in community informatics, 1st edn. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kaye J’ (2006) I just clicked to say I love you. In: Proceedings of the CHI EA ‘06. ACM Press, New York, pp 363–368

  6. 6.

    Go K, Carroll J, Imamiya A (2000) Familyware. In: IFIP ‘00. Springer, Boston, pp 125–140

  7. 7.

    Reeves S, Sherwood S, Brown B (2010) Designing for crowds. In: Proceedings of the NordiCHI ‘10. ACM Press, New York, pp 393–402

  8. 8.

    Benford S, Crabtree A, Reeves S et al (2006) The frame of the game: blurring the boundary between fiction and reality in mobile experiences. In: Proceedings of the CHI ‘06. ACM Press, New York, pp 427–436

  9. 9.

    Dalsgaard P, Dindler C, Eriksson E (2008) Designing for participation in public knowledge institutions. In: Proceedings of the NordiCHI ‘08. ACM Press, New York

  10. 10.

    Sheridan JG, Dix A, Lock S, Bayliss A (2005) Understanding interaction in ubiquitous guerrilla performances in playful arenas. In: Fincher S, Markpolulos P, Moore D, Ruddle R (eds) People and computers XVIII—design for Life. Springer, London, pp 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Paulos E, Goodman E (2004) The familiar stranger. In: Proceedings of the CHI (EA) ‘04. ACM Press, New York, pp 223–230

  12. 12.

    Fisher K, Counts S, Kittur A (2012) Distributed sensemaking: improving sense making by leveraging the efforts of previous users. In: Proceedings of the CHI ‘12. ACM Press, New York, pp 247–256

  13. 13.

    Massung E, Coyle D, Cater KF, et al (2013) Using crowdsourcing to support pro-environmental community activism. In: Proceedings of the CHI ‘13. ACM Press, New York, pp 371–380

  14. 14.

    Greenberg MD, Hui J, Gerber E (2013) Crowdfunding. In: Proceedings of the CHI EA ‘13. ACM Press, New York, pp 883–888

  15. 15.

    McCarthy J, Wright P (2004) Technology as experience. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wright P, McCarthy J (2010) Experience-centered design: designers, users, and communities in dialogue. Morgan & Claypool

  17. 17.

    Petersen MG, Iversen OS, Krogh PG, Ludvigsen M (2004) Aesthetic interaction: a pragmatist’s aesthetics of interactive systems. In: Proceedings of the DIS ‘04. ACM Press, New York, pp 269–276

  18. 18.

    Forlizzi J, Ford S (2000) The building blocks of experience: an early framework for interaction designers. In: Proceedings of the DIS ‘00. ACM Press, New York, pp 419–423

  19. 19.

    Forlizzi J, Battarbee K (2004) Understanding experience in interactive systems. In: Proceedings of the DIS ‘04. ACM Press, New York, pp 261–268

  20. 20.

    Bødker S (2006) When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In: Proceedings of the NordiCHI ‘06. ACM Press, New York, pp 1–8

  21. 21.

    Dewey J (1997) Experience and education. Touchstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Shedroff N (2001) Experience design. New Riders pub., Indianapolis

  23. 23.

    Battarbee K (2003) Co-Experience: the social user experience. In: Proceedings of the CHI (EA) ‘03. ACM Press, New York, pp 730–731

  24. 24.

    Battarbee K, Koskinen I (2005) Co-experience: user experience as interaction. CoDesign 1:5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Battarbee K (2003) Defining co-experience. In: Proceedings of the DPPI ‘03. ACM Press, New York, pp 109–113

  26. 26.

    Battarbee K (2007) Co-experience: product experience as social interaction. In: Schifferstein HNJ, Hekker P (eds) Product experience. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 461–477

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Guttmann A (2006) Sports crowds. In: Schnapp JT, Tiews M (eds) Crowds. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 111–132

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Rinehart RE (1998) Players all: performance in contemporary sport. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ludvigsen M, Veerasawmy R (2010) Designing technology for active spectator experiences at sporting events. In: Proceedings of the OZCHI ‘10. ACM Press, New York, pp 96–103

  30. 30.

    Esbjörnsson M, Brown B, Juhlin O et al (2006) Watching the cars go round and round: designing for active spectating. In: Proceedings of the CHI ‘06. ACM Press, New York, pp 1221–1224

  31. 31.

    Jacucci G, Oulasvirta A, Salovaara A (2006) Active construction of experience through mobile media: a field study with implications for recording and sharing. Pers Ubiquit Comput 11:215–234. doi:10.1007/s00779-006-0084-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jacucci G, Oulasvirta A, Ilmonen T, et al (2007) Comedia: mobile group media for active spectatorship. In: Proceedings of the CHI ‘07. ACM Press, New York, pp 1273–1282

  33. 33.

    Bentley F, Groble M (2009) TuVista: meeting the multimedia needs of mobile sports fans. In: Proceedings of the MM ‘09. ACM Press, New York, pp 471–480

  34. 34.

    Giulianotti R (1999) Football: a sociology of the global game. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kratzmüller B (2010) Show yourself to the people! In: Frank S, Steets S (eds) Stadium worlds. Routledge, New York, pp 36–55

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Clarke J (1978) Football and working class fans: tradition and change. In: Ingham R, Hall S, Clarke J et al (eds) Football hooliganism: the wider context. Inter-Action Inprint, London, pp 37–60

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bakhtin M (1984) Rabelais and his world. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Crabbe T, Brown A (2004) ‘You‘re not welcome anymore’: the football crowd, class and social exclusion. In: Wagg S (ed) British football and social exclusion. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 26–46

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bale J (1993) Sport, space and the city. Blackburn Press, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Crawford G (2004) Consuming sport: fans, sport and culture. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Raitz KB (1995) The theater of sport. John Hopkins University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Oriard M (1981) Professional football as cultural myth. J Am Cult 4:27–41. doi:10.1111/j.1542-734X.1981.0403_27.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bale J (2000) The changing face of football: stadiums and communities. Soccer Soc 1:91–101. doi:10.1080/14660970008721251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ault A, Krogmeier JV, Dunlop SR, Coyle EDJ (2008) eStadium: the mobile wireless football experience. In: Proceedings of the ICIW ‘08. IEEE, pp 644–649

  45. 45.

    Storm RK, Brandt HH (2008) Idræt og Sport I Den Danske Oplevelsesøkonomi—Mellem Forening og Forretning. Imagine.. og Samfundslitteratur, Gylling, Denmark

  46. 46.

    King A (1998) The end of the terraces: the transformation of English football in the 1990s. Leicester University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Brown A (1998) United we stand—some problems with fan democracy. In: Brown A (ed) Fanatics! Power, identity, and fandom in football. Routledge, New York, pp 50–67

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Taylor J (1989) Hillsborough stadium disaster inquiry—interim report. Secretary of State for the Home Department, London

  49. 49.

    Relph E (1981) Rational landscapes and humanistic geography. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    King A (2010) The new European stadium. In: Frank S, Steets S (eds) Stadium worlds. Routledge, New York, pp 19–35

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    de Tarde G (1962) The laws of imitation, 2nd edn. Henry Holt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    de Tarde G (1899) Social laws—an outline of sociology. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    de Tarde G (1968) Penal philosophy. William Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Le Bon G (2001) The crowd—a study of the poplar mind. Batoche Books, Kitchener

  55. 55.

    Canetti E (1984) Crowds and power, 1st edn. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Borch C (2009) Out of sight, out of mind: on the power/knowledge of crowds and atmospheres. In: Strategic unknowns: the usefulness of ambiguity and ignorance in organizational life 2009. Oxford, pp 1–22

  57. 57.

    Borch C (2005) Urban imitations: Tarde’s sociology revisited. Theory Cult Soc 22:81–100. doi:10.1177/0263276405053722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sloterdijk P (2008) Foam city. Distinkt Scand J Social Theory 9:47–59. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2008.9672955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sampson TD (2012) Virality: contagion theory in the age of networks. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Veerasawmy R, Iversen OS (2012) BannerBattle—introducing crowd experience to interaction design. In: Proceedings of the NordiCHI ‘12. ACM Press, New York, pp 228–237

  61. 61.

    Flick U (2005) An introduction to qualitiative research, 2nd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Blomberg J, Giacomi J, Mocher A, Swenton-Wall P (1993) Etnographic field methods and their relation to design. In: Schuler D, Namioka A (eds) Participatory design: principles and practices. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 123–155

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Bødker S, Christiansen E (1997) Scenarios as springboards in CSCW design. In: Bowker GC, Star SL, Turner W, Gasser L (eds) Social science, technical systems, and cooperative work: beyond the great divide. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 217–233

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Ehn P, Kyng M (1991) Cardboard computers: mocking-it-up or hands-on the future. In: Greenbaum J, Kyng M (eds) Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 169–195

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Zimmerman J, Forlizzi J, Evenson S (2007) Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: Proceedings of the CHI ‘07. ACM Press, New York, pp 483–502

  66. 66.

    Jensen B (2009) BannerBattle til AGF-BIF. http://www.agffodbold.dk/agf-fodbold/nyhedsarkiv/2009/2-kvartal/bannerbattle-til-agf-bif/?page=0. Accessed 30 Aug 2013

  67. 67.

    Giulianotti R (2002) Supporters, followers, fans, and flaneurs: a taxonomy of spectator identities in football. J Sport Soc Issues 26:25–46. doi:10.1177/0193723502261003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Stone C (2007) The role of football in everyday life. Soccer Soc 8:169–184. doi:10.1080/14660970701224319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Fiske J (1992) The cultural economy of fandom. In: Lewis LA (ed) The adoring audience: fan culture and popular media. Routledge, London, pp 30–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by Aarhus University’s interdisciplinary research center Participatory IT, PIT. BannerBattle was developed in the iSport project, under ISIS2. We would like to thank our colleagues, who have helped with the project at the Centre for Interactive Spaces. We thank Aarhus Elite for their willingness to participate in our experiment, and interviewees and workshop participants for contributing knowledge to the project.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rune Veerasawmy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veerasawmy, R., McCarthy, J. When noise becomes voice: designing interactive technology for crowd experiences through imitation and invention. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18, 1601–1615 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0761-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Crowd experience
  • Technology-supported spectator experiences
  • User experience design
  • Sporting events