Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 175–185 | Cite as

Multi-field relations in designing for short-range RFID

Original Article

Abstract

Multi-field inputs are techniques driven by multiple short-range RFID-enabled artifacts like RFID-tags and RFID-tag readers. The technology is useful for designers so as to enable the construction of advanced interaction through the physical world. To take advantage of such opportunities, it is important to understand the technology in terms of what interactions it might offer designers. I address this issue by unwrapping and exposing elements that can be used to conceptualize multi-field interactions. This is done by way of a design driven inquiry in which design and research methods are used to investigate short-range RFID technology. My approach is informed by activity theory which I use to analyze RFID technology from a design perspective. The study presents multi-field relations as a conceptual framework that can be used to describe and generate multi-field inputs. Four types of multi-field relations are discussed: one-way, two-way, sequence and multiple relations. These are described and analyzed in context of a set of multi-field input examples. The multi-field relations expose elements that can be used to construct interactions. This is important for interaction designers, since new interactions presents designers with opportunities for making entirely new types of interfaces that can lead to interesting and surprising experiences.

Keywords

Multi-field interaction Multi-tag Multi-field inputs Multi-field relations NFC Short-range RFID Mobile interaction 

References

  1. 1.
    Touch project (2009). Available at. http://www.nearfield.org
  2. 2.
    Ullmer B, Ishii H (2000) Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Syst J 39(3–4):915–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eriksson E, Hansen TR, Lykke-Olesen A (2007) Movement-based interaction in camera spaces: a conceptual framework. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 11(8):621–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    NFC-forum (2009). Available at. http://www.nfc-forum.org
  5. 5.
    Want R, Fishkin KP, Gujar A, Harrison BL (1999) Bridging physical and virtual worlds with electronic tags. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit. ACM Press, Pittsburgh, pp 370–377Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Välkkynen P, Korhonen I, Plomp J, Tuomisto T, Cluitmans L, Ailisto H, Seppä H (2003) A user interaction paradigm for physical browsing and near-object control based on tags. In: Proceedings of physical interaction (PI03)—workshop on real world user interfaces in conjunction with fifth international symposium on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI 2003), Udine, Italy, pp 31–34Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rukzio E, Leichtenstern K, Callaghan V, Holleis P, Schmidt A, Chin J (2006) An experimental comparison of physical mobile interaction techniques: touching, pointing and scanning. In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on ubiquitous computing. Orange County, California, pp 87–104Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ballagas R, Rohs M, Sheridan J, Borchers J (2006) The smart phone: a ubiquitous input device. IEEE Pervasive Comput 5(1):70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Broll G, Haarländer M, Paolucci M, Wagner M, Rukzio E, Schmidt A (2008) Collect&Drop: a technique for multi-tag interaction with real world objects and information. In: Proceedings of european conference on ambient intelligence. Springer, Nürnberg, pp 175–191Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Häikiö J, Wallin A, Isomursu M, Ailisto H, Matinmikko T, Huomo T (2007) Touch-based user interface for elderly users. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM Press, Singapore, pp 289–296Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Broll G, Siorpaes S, Rukzio E, Paolucci M, Hamard J, Wagner M, Schmidt A (2007) Supporting mobile service usage through physical mobile interaction. In: Proceedings of the fifth IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications. IEEE Comput Soc, Hawaii, pp 262–271Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hardy R, Rukzio E (2008) Touch & interact: touch-based interaction of mobile phones with displays. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, ACM press, Amsterdam, pp 245–254Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reilly D, Welsman-Dinelle M, Bate C, Inkpen K (2005) Just point and click? Using handhelds to interact with paper maps. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices & services. ACM Press, Salzburg, pp 239–242Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rohs M, Zweifel P (2005) A conceptual framework for camera phone-based interaction techniques. In: Proceedings of PERVASIVE 2005. Springer, Munich, pp 171–189Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nardi BA (1996) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaptelinin V, Nardi BA (2006) Acting with technology. Activity, theory and interaction design. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vygotsky LS (1962) Thought and language. The MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leont’ev AN (1978) Activity, consciousness and personality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuutti K (1995) Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In: Nardi BA (ed) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human computer interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 17–44Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wolf TV, Rode JA, Sussman J, Kellogg WA (2006) Dispelling “design” as the black art of CHI. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, ACM press, Montréal, pp 521–530Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zimmerman J, Forlizzi J, Evenson S (2007) Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, San Jose, pp 493–502Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Löwgren J (2007) Forskning kring digitala material. (Interaction design, research practices and design research on the digital materials). In: Hjelm SI (ed) Under ytan: Om designforskning. Raster Förlag, Stockholm, pp 150–163Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fallman D (2003) Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, Ft. Lauderdale, pp 225–232Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Carroll JM (1999) Five reasons for scenario-based design. In: Proceedings of the thirty-second annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE Computer Society, Hawaii, p 3051Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hutchinson H, Mackay W, Westerlund B, Bederson BB, Druin A, Plaisant C, Beaudouin-Lafon M, Conversy S, Evans H, Hansen H, Roussel N, Eiderbäck B (2003) Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM press, Ft. Lauderdale, pp 17–24Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buxton W (1990) A three-state model of graphical input. In: Proceedings of IFIP Tc13 third international conference on human-computer interaction. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, pp 449–456Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen M (1993) A framework for describing interactions with graphical widgets using state-transition diagrams. In: Proceedings of INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93 conference companion on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, Amsterdam, pp 131–132Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    PERCI (PERvasive ServiCe Interaction) (2009). Available at. http://www.hcilab.org/projects/perci/
  30. 30.
    Shneiderman B (1983) Direct manipulation: a step beyond programming languages. IEEE Comput Graphics Appl 16(8):57–69Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rekimoto J (1997) Pick-and-drop: a direct manipulation technique for multiple computer environments. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. ACM Press, Banff, pp 31–39Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Design, The Oslo School of Architecture and DesignOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations