Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 12, Issue 7, pp 481–493 | Cite as

Hybrid ecologies: understanding cooperative interaction in emerging physical-digital environments

Original Article

Abstract

We consider the emergence of hybrid ecologies, which marry mixed reality environments and ubiquitous computing environments together to bridge the physical-digital divide. Hybrid ecologies are new class of digital ecology that merge multiple environments, physical and digital, together. Collaboration in these emerging environments is characterized by ‘fragmented interaction’ in that it is mediated by interaction mechanisms that are differentially distributed. Unpacking the collaborative nature of fragmented interaction requires that we uncover the ordinary interactional competences that users exploit to make differentially distributed mechanisms of interaction work and the distributed practices that articulate ‘seamful’ representations and provide for awareness and coordination.

Keywords

Cooperative interaction Ethnography Ecology Mixed reality environments Ubiquitous computing environments Hybrid ecologies 

References

  1. 1.
    Barkhuus L et al (2005) Picking pockets on the lawn. In: Proceedings of the UbiComp 2005, Springer, Tokyo, pp 358–374Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benford S, Fahlén L (1993) A spatial model of interaction in large virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the ECSCW 1993, Kluwer, Milano, pp 107–132Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benford S et al (2004) The error of our ways. In: Proceedings of the UbiComp 2004, Springer, Nottingham, pp 70–87Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benford S et al (2006) The frame of the game: blurring the boundary between fiction and reality in mobile experiences. In: Proceedings the 2006 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Montreal, pp 427–436Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bly S, et al (1993) Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. Commun ACM 36(1):28–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown B, et al (2005) Sharing the square: collaborative leisure in the city streets. In: Proceedings of the ECSCW 2005, Springer, Paris, pp 427–429Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burrell J, et al (2002) Context-aware computing: a test case. In: Proceedings of the UbiComp 2002, Springer, Gothenberg, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Button G, Sharrock WW (1997) The production of order and the order of production. In: Proceedings of the ECSCW 1997, Kluwer, Lancaster, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chalmers M (2004) Space/place reconsidered. Presented at spaces, spatiality and technology conference, Napier University, Edinburgh, 12–14 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chalmers M, Galani M (2004) Seamful interweaving. In: Proceedings of the DIS 2004, ACM, Cambridge, MA, pp 243–252Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crabtree A, Rodden T (2004) Domestic routines and design for the home. J CSCW 13(2):191–220Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Crabtree A, et al (2004) Orchestrating a mixed reality game ‘on the ground’. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2004, ACM, Vienna, pp 391–398Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crabtree A, Rodden T, Benford S (2005) Moving with the times: IT research and the boundaries of CSCW. J CSCW 14(3):217–251Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crabtree A, et al (2006) Developing digital records: early experiences of record and replay, Computer supported cooperative work. J Collab Comput 15(4):281–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dourish P, et al (1996) Your place or mine? J CSCW 5(1):33–62Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flintham M, et al (2003) Where on-line meets on-the-streets. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2003, ACM, Florida, pp 569–576Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fraser M, et al (2003) Assembling history: achieving coherent experiences with diverse technologies. In: Proceedings of the ECSCW 2003, Kluwer, Helsinki, pp 179–198Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garfinkel H, Wieder DL (1992) Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In: Watson G, Seiler SM (eds) Text in context: contributions to ethnomethodology, Sage, New York, pp 175–206Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garfinkel H (1996) Ethnomethodology’s program. Soc Psychol Q 59(1):5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garfinkel H (2002) Instructions and instructed actions. In: Proceedings of the ethnomethodology’s program: working out Durkheim’s Aphorism, Rowman & Littlefield, Maryland, pp 197–218Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gaver W (1992) The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. In: Proceedings of CSCW 1992, ACM, Toronto, pp 17–24Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harrison S, Dourish P (1996) Re-place-ing space. In: Proceedings of the CSCW 1996, ACM, Boston, pp 67–76Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heath C, Luff P (1991) Disembodied conduct. In: Proceedings of the CHI 1991, ACM, New Orleans, pp 99–103Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heath C, Luff P (1992) Media space and communicative asymmetries. Hum Comput Interact 7:315–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hughes J, et al (1992) Faltering from ethnography to design. In: Proceedings of the CSCW 1992, ACM, Toronto, pp 115–122Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hughes J, et al (1994) Perspectives on the social organization of work. In: Field studies and CSCW (COMIC Deliverable 2.2), Lancaster University, pp 129–160Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ishii H, Ullmer B (1997) Tangible bits. In: Proceedings of the CHI 97, ACM, Atlanta, pp 234–241Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koleva B, et al (2000) Traversable interfaces between real and virtual worlds. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2000, ACM, The Hague, pp 233–240Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kirk D, et al (2005) Ways of the hands. In: Proceedings of the ECSCW 2005, Springer, Paris, pp 1–21Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kuzouka H, et al (2004) Mediating dual ecologies. In: Proceedings of the CSCW 2004, ACM, Chicago, pp 477–486Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Luff P, et al (2003) Fractured ecologies. Hum Comput Interact 18(1):51–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Milgram P, et al (1995) Merging real and virtual worlds. Presented at Imagina 1995, INA, Monte Carlo, 1–3 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pettersson M, et al (2002) Ambiguities, awareness and economy. In: Proceedings of the CSCW 2002, ACM, New Orleans, pp 286–295Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rudström Å, et al (2005) Social positioning: designing the seams between social, physical and digital space. In: Proceedings of the HCII 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Las Vegas, pp 24–27Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sawyer P, Mariani J (1995) Database systems: challenges and opportunities for graphical HCI. Interact Comput 7(1):273–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schilit B, et al (1994) Context-aware computing applications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE workshop on mobile computing systems and applications, IEEE, Santa Cruz, CA, pp 85–90Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schmidt K, Bannon L (1992) Taking CSCW seriously: supporting articulation work. J CSCW 1(1):7–40Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schmidt K (2002) The problem with ‘awareness’. J CSCW 11(3):285–298Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Steed A, et al (2004) The use of models of space in mixed-reality systems. In: Proceedings of IV 2005, IEEE, London, pp 768–777Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Streitz N, et al (2005) Designing smart artefacts for smart environments. IEEE Comput 38(3):41–49Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tolmie P, et al (2002) Unremarkable computing. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2002, ACM, Minneapolis, pp 399–406Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Weiser M (1991) The computer for the 21st Century. Sci Am 265(3):94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yoneki E, Bacon J (2005) Unified semantics for event correlation over time and space in hybrid network environments. In: Proceedings of the CoopIS 2005, Springer, Agia Napa, Cyprus, pp 366–384Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and ITUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations