Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 326–337 | Cite as

From turtles to Tangible Programming Bricks: explorations in physical language design

Original Article

Abstract

This article provides a historical overview of educational computing research at MIT from the mid-1960s to the present day, focusing on physical interfaces. It discusses some of the results of this research: electronic toys that help children develop advanced modes of thinking through free-form play. In this historical context, the article then describes and discusses the author’s own research into tangible programming, culminating in the development of the Tangible Programming Bricks system—a platform for creating microworlds for children to explore computation and scientific thinking.

Keywords

Programming languages Microworlds Tangible user interfaces Education Children History of computing Construction toys Hands-on learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Resnick M, Martin F, Berg R, Borovoy R, Colella V, Kramer K, Silverman B (1998) Digital manipulatives: new toys to think with. In: Proceedings of the CHI’98 conference on human factors in computing systems, Los Angeles, California, April 1998. ACM Press, New York, pp 281–287. DOI 10.1145/274644.274684Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abelson H, diSessa A (1981) Turtle geometry: the computer as a medium for exploring mathematics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perlman R (1976) Using computer technology to provide a creative learning environment for preschool children. Logo memo no 24, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Publications 260, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Halbert DC (1984) Programming by example. PhD thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frei P, Su V, Mikhak B, Ishii H (2000) Curlybot: designing a new class of computational toys. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2000 conference on human factors in computing systems, The Hague, The Netherlands, April 2000. ACM Press, New York, pp 129–136. DOI 10.1145/332040.332416Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laurel B (1993) Computers as theater. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin F, Resnick M (1993) LEGO/Logo and electronic bricks: creating a scienceland for children. In: Ferguson D (ed) Advanced educational technologies for mathematics and science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin F, Mikhak B, Resnick M, Silverman B, Berg R (2000) To mindstorms and beyond: evolution of a construction kit for magical machines. In: Robots for kids: exploring new technologies for learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Resnick M (1993) Behavior construction kits. Commun ACM 36(7):64–71. DOI 10.1145/159544.159593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borovoy R (1996) Genuine object oriented programming. Masters thesis, MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin F, Mikhak B, Silverman B (2000) MetaCricket: a designers’ kit for making computational devices. IBM Syst J 39(34):795–815Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lackner TM, Dobson K, Rodenstein R, Weisman L (1999) Sensory puzzles. In: Extended abstracts from the proceedings of the CHI’99 conference on human factors in computing system, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 1999. ACM Press, New York, pp 270–271. DOI 10.1145/632716.632882Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suzuki H, Kato H (1993) AlgoBlock: a tangible programming language, a tool for collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Logo conference (Eurologo’93), Athens, Greece, August 1993, pp 297–303Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McNerney T (2000) Tangible Programming Bricks: an approach to making programming accessible to everyone. Masters thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Available at http://www.media.mit.edu/people/mc/tangible-programming.html
  15. 15.
    Norman DA (2002) The design of everyday things. Basic Books (Perseus), New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Henderson P (2002) Functional geometry. Higher-Order Symb Comp 15(4):349–365Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abelson H, Sussman GJ, Sussman J (1996) Structure and interpretation of computer programs, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Papert S (1999) Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas, 2nd edn. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Resnick M, Berg R, Eisenberg M (2000) Beyond black boxes: bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific instruments. J Learn Sci 9(1):7–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ungar D, Lieberman H, Fry C (1997) Debugging and the experience of immediacy. Commun ACM 20(4):38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anagnostou G, Dewey D, Patera A (1989) Geometry-defining processors for engineering design and analysis. Vis Comput 5(5):304–315Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anderson D, Frankel JL, Marks J, Leigh D, Sullivan E, Yedidia JS, Ryall K (1999) Building virtual structures with physical blocks. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (UIST’99), Asheville, North Carolina, November 1999. CHI Letters 1(1):71–72Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wyeth P, Purchase H (2002) Tangible Programming elements for young children. In: Extended abstracts from the proceedings of the CHI 2002 conference on human factors in computing systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, April 2002. ACM Press, New York, pp 774–775. DOI 10.1145/506443.506591Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Begel A (1996) LogoBlocks: a graphical programming language for interacting with the world. SB thesis, MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Available at http://www.media.mit.edu/people/abegel/begelaup.pdf
  25. 25.
    Smith DC, Cypher A, Spohrer J (1994) KidSim: programming agents without a programming language. Commun ACM 37(7):54–67. DOI 10.1145/176789.176795CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Repenning A, Ambach J (1996) Tactile programming: a unified manipulation paradigm supporting program comprehension, composition, and sharing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on visual languages, Boulder, Colorado, September 1996 pp 102–109Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fitzmaurice G, Ishii H, Buxton W (1995) Bricks: laying the foundation for graspable user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the CHI’95 conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, Colorado, May 1995. ACM Press, New York, pp 442–449Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gorbet M, Orth M, Ishii H (1998) Triangles: tangible interface for manipulation and exploration of digital information topography. In: Proceedings of the CHI’98 conference on human factors in computing systems, Los Angeles, California, April 1998. ACM Press, New York, pp 49–56. DOI 10.1145/274644.274652Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ishii H, Ullmer B (1997) Tangible bits: toward seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on intelligent user interfaces, Orlando, Florida, January 1997. ACM Press, New York, pp 234–241. DOI 10.1145/604045.604048Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ullmer B, Ishii H, Glas D (1998) MediaBlocks: physical containers, transports, and controls for online media. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual conference on computer graphics (SIGGRAPH’98), Orlando, Florida, July 1998. ACM Press, New York, pp 379–386. DOI 10.1145/280814.280940Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Underkoffler J, Ishii H (1998) Illuminating light: an optical design tool with a luminous-tangible interface. In: Proceedings of the CHI’98 conference on human factors in computing systems, Los Angeles, California, April 1998.. ACM Press, New York, pp 542–549. DOI 10.1145/274644.274717Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Soloway E, Spohrer J (1989) Studying the novice programmer. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Resnick M (1994) Turtles, termites, and traffic jams: explorations in massively parallel microworlds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kahn K (1996) Drawings on napkins, video-game animation, and other ways to program computers. Commun ACM 39(8):49–59. DOI 10.1145/232014.232028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gindling J, Ioannidou A, Loh J, Lokkebo O, Repenning A (1995) LEGOsheets: a rule-based programming, simulation and manipulation environment for the LEGO programmable brick. In: Proceedings of the 11th international IEEE symposium on visual languages, Darmstadt, Germany, September 1995. IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 172–179Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Repenning A, Sumner T (1995) Agentsheets: a medium for creating domain-oriented visual languages. IEEE Comput 28(3):17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Martin F, Resnick M, Silverman B (1990) Braitenberg bricks: A LEGO-based creature-construction kit. In: Proceedings of the workshop on artificial life conference (ALIFE’90), Center for Nonlinear Studies, Santa Fe, New Mexico, February 1990Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Braitenberg V (1984) Vehicles: experiments in synthetic psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ChipWrights, Inc.WalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations