Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Erratum to: The VLDB Journal DOI 10.1007/s00778-017-0463-8
The original article uses incorrect versions of Figures 6, 7, 8, 9 that do not match their descriptions. The correct figures are given below. The original article has been corrected (Figs. 6, 7, 8, 9).
The effect of contention for single-version (top) and multi-version (bottom) models, with 30 clients
Effect of write-intensive transactions
Interference between ten update transactions and a varying number of read-only transactions under single (top) and multi (bottom) version models. Both RC+SSN and RCL+SSN suffer very high abort rates for readers
Abort rate versus safe snapshot frequency
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s00778-017-0463-8.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, T., Johnson, R., Fekete, A. et al. Erratum to: Efficiently making (almost) any concurrency control mechanism serializable. The VLDB Journal 27, 899–900 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-017-0471-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-017-0471-8