Abstract
Background
Alloarthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint is indicated for patients with osteoarthritis, an inflammatory disease of the joint. According to the current literature, implants made of silicone are not inferior to newer implants and the complications are well known. Therefore, focus should be shifted to the operative approach to improve the results.
Methods
Eleven silicone arthroplasties in 7 patients with arthritis and 35 silicone arthroplasties in 23 patients with osteoarthritis were reviewed after 15.6 months and after 105.3 months. All implants were inserted using the palmar approach according to Simmen. We compared the pre- and postoperative arc of motion, pain, and strength, and present postoperative complications and satisfaction.
Results
Patients with arthritis showed a gain in range of motion of 36° and patients with osteoarthritis of 39°. No implant failure occurred, and one revision was performed,. Average extension lag over all operated joints of patients was 2.8°. No swan-neck deformity or extensor tendon adhesion was observed. There was no significant difference in the postoperative results between patients with osteoarthritis and arthritis or between first and second follow-up.
Conclusion
Silicone arthroplasty restores the functionality of proximal interphalangeal joints in patients with osteoarthritis and inflammatory joint disease. Using a palmar approach, the surgeon can reach palmar and dorsal osteophytes. The extensor mechanism stays intact reducing the risk for extensor lag and other complications compared to the dorsal approach. The results do not change significantly between 1 and 8 years postoperatively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Woodworth JA, McCullough MB, Grosland NM, Adams BD. Impact of simulated proximal interphalangeal arthrodeses of all fingers on hand function. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(6):940–6.
Pellegrini VD Jr, Burton RI. Osteoarthritis of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the hand: arthroplasty or fusion? J Hand Surg Am. 1990;15(2):194–209.
Murray PM. Prosthetic replacement of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Hand Clin. 2006;22(2):201–6.
Wijk U, Wollmark M, Kopylov P, Tagil M. Outcomes of proximal interphalangeal joint pyrocarbon implants. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(1):38–43.
Nunley RM, Boyer MI, Goldfarb CA. Pyrolytic carbon arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(9):1468–74.
Jennings CD, Livingstone DP. Surface replacement arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint using the PIP-SRA implant: results, complications, and revisions. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(9):1565 e1–11.
Swanson AB, Maupin BK, Gajjar NV, Swanson GD. Flexible implant arthroplasty in the proximal interphalangeal joint of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1985;10(6 Pt 1):796–805.
Berndsen M, Garanin G, Lautenbach M. Endoprothetik der rheumatischen Hand. Obere Extremität. 2011;6(4):246–52.
Daecke W, Veyel K, Wieloch P, Jung M, Lorenz H, Martini AK. Osseointegration and mechanical stability of pyrocarbon and titanium hand implants in a load-bearing in vivo model for small joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(1):90–7.
Linscheid RL, Murray PM, Vidal MA, Beckenbaugh RD. Development of a surface replacement arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joints. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22(2):286–98.
Daecke W, Kaszap B, Martini AK, Hagena FW, Rieck B, Jung M. A prospective, randomized comparison of 3 types of proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(9):1770-9 e1–3.
Kobayashi K, Terrono AL. Proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty of the hand. J Am Soc Surg Hand. 2003;3(4):219–26.
Herren DB, Schindele S, Goldhahn J, Simmen BR. Problematic bone fixation with pyrocarbon implants in proximal interphalangeal joint replacement: short-term results. J Hand Surg Br. 2006;31(6):643–51.
Stahlenbrecher A, Hoch J. Proximal interphalangeal joint silicone arthroplasty–comparison of Swanson and NeuFlex implants using a new evaluation score. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2009;41(3):156–65. (in German). doi:10.1055/s-0029-1220921
Herren DB, Simmen BR. Palmar approach in flexible implant arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:131–5.
Chamay A. A distally based dorsal and triangular tendinous flap for direct access to the proximal interphalangeal joint. Ann Chir Main. 1988;7(2):179–83.
Segalman KA. Lateral approach to proximal interphalangeal joint implant arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(6):905–8.
Schneider LH. Proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: the volar approach. Semin Arthroplasty. 1991;2(2):139–47.
Der Simmen B. palmare zugang zur arthroplastik des proximalen interphalangeal-Finger-Gelenks. Operat Orthop Traumatol. 1993;5(2):112–23.
Takigawa S, Meletiou S, Sauerbier M, Cooney WP. Long-term assessment of Swanson implant arthroplasty in the proximal interphalangeal joint of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29(5):785–95.
Iselin F, Conti E. Long-term results of proximal interphalangeal joint resection arthroplasties with a silicone implant. J Hand Surg Am. 1995;20(3 Pt 2):S95–7.
Fahmy NR, Lavender A, Brew C. A conservative approach for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Br. 2001;26(3):235–7.
Green SM, Posner MA, Garay A. Silicone rubber arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint: dorsal and lateral approaches. Semin Arthroplasty. 1991;2(2):130–8.
Lin HH, Wyrick JD, Stern PJ. Proximal interphalangeal joint silicone replacement arthroplasty: clinical results using an anterior approach. J Hand Surg Am. 1995;20(1):123–32.
Stoecklein HH, Garg R, Wolfe SW. Surface replacement arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint using a volar approach: case series. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(6):1015–21.
Sweets TM, Stern PJ. Proximal interphalangeal joint prosthetic arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(7):1190–3.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Lautenbach, M., Kim, S., Berndsen, M. et al. The palmar approach for PIP-arthroplasty according to Simmen: results after 8 years follow-up. J Orthop Sci 19, 722–728 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0605-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0605-4