Skip to main content
Log in

A 5–22-year follow-up study of stemmed alumina ceramic total elbow arthroplasties with cement fixation for patients with rheumatoid arthritis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

We determined mid to long-term results of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) by use of unlinked elbow prostheses with solid alumina ceramic trochleae, and ceramic ulnar stems (stemmed Kyocera type I; SKC-I) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Patients and methods

Fifty-four elbows of 39 patients were available for detailed clinical and radiographic review after a follow-up period of at least 5 years. The mean follow-up period was 12.6 years (range 5–22 years). Clinical condition before and after surgery was assessed by use of a modified version of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS; 0–100 points) and a Japan Orthopaedic Association Elbow score (JOA score; 0–100 points). The radiographs were reviewed and loosening was defined as a progressive radiolucent line >1 mm wide that was completely circumferential around the prosthesis. Clinical records of post-operative events affecting the elbows were used for survival analysis of the prostheses using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

The average modified MEPS and JOA scores improved significantly from 39.7 ± 14.3 to 44.7 ± 9.4, respectively, pre-operatively, to 89.7 ± 15.4 and 83.1 ± 12.8, respectively, post-operatively (P < 0.0001). The functional assessment score also improved from 4.9 ± 2.8 to 8.5 ± 3.3 points (P < 0.0001). With loosening or implant revision defined as end points, the likelihood of survival of the prosthesis for up to 20 years was 92.6 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 85.6–100.0) or 86.3 % (95 % CI 75.0–97.6), respectively.

Conclusion

Satisfactory clinical results were obtained after TEA using SKC-I prostheses, which provided excellent pain relief and functional range of motion. The results of our study reveal the high reliability over a long period of the cemented SKC-I prosthesis with an alumina ceramic component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Souter WA. Surgery of the rheumatoid elbow. Ann Rheum Dis. 1990;49(Suppl 2):871–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gschwend N, Simmen BR, Matejovsky Z. Late complications in elbow arthroplasty. J Should Elb Surg. 1996;5:86–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernardino S. Total elbow arthroplasty: history, current concepts, and future. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29:1217–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ewald FC, Simmons ED Jr, Sullivan JA, Thomas WH, Scott RD, Poss R, Thornhill TS, Sledge CB. Capitellocondylar total elbow replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:498–507.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Trail IA, Nuttall D, Stanley JK. Survivorship and radiological analysis of the standard Souter–Strathclyde total elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:80–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Landor I, Vavrik P, Jahoda D, Guttler K, Sosna A. Total elbow replacement with the Souter–Strathclyde prosthesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1460–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka N, Kudo H, Iwano K, Sakahashi H, Sato E, Ishii S. Kudo total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83-A:1506–13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kudo H, Iwano K, Nishino J. Total elbow arthroplasty with use of a nonconstrained humeral component inserted without cement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1268–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morrey BF, Adams RA. Semiconstrained arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:479–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gschwend N, Scheier NH, Baehler AR. Long-term results of the GSB III elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:1005–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Inoue H, Yokoyama Y, Tanabe G. Alumina ceramic elbow prosthesis. In: Hamalainen M, Hagena FW, editors. Rheumatoid arthritis surgery of the elbow. Basel: Karger; 1991. p. 78–87.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Larsen A, Dale K, Eek M. Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1977;18:481–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ryu J, Saito S, Honda T, Oikawa H, Sakamoto A. A new total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. Japanese J Rheumatol. 1998;8:411–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Verstreken F, De Smet L, Westhovens R, Fabry G. Results of the Kudo elbow prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary report. Clin Rheumatol. 1998;17:325–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsuge K, Murakami T, Yasunaga Y, Kanujia R. Arthroplasty of the elbow. Twenty year’s experience of a new approach. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1987;69:116–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Souter WA. The evolution of total replacement arthroplasty of the elbow. In: Kashiwagi D, editor. Elbow Joint. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica; 1985. pp. 255–68.

  17. Inoue H, Yokoyama Y, Sumii H. Elbow arthroplasty with ceramic prosthesis. Techniques Orthop. 1991;6:27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Simmen BR, Bogoch ER, Goldhahn J. Surgery Insight: orthopedic treatment options in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008;4:266–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ozaki T, Hashizume K, Nakahara R, Nishida K. Radiographic remodeling of the shoulder joint in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis after 4 years of treatment with etanercept. Mod Rheumatol. 2012;22:635–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jazrawi LM, Kummer FJ, DiCesare PE. Alternative bearing surfaces for total joint arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6:198–203.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van der Lugt JC, Geskus RB, Rozing PM. Primary Souter–Strathclyde total elbow prosthesis in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86-A:465–73.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Potter D, Claydon P, Stanley D. Total elbow replacement using the Kudo prosthesis. Clinical and radiological review with five- to seven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:354–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kelly EW, Coghlan J, Bell S. Five- to thirteen-year follow-up of the GSB III total elbow arthroplasty. J Should Elb Surg. 2004;13:434–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gill DR, Morrey BF. The Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A ten to fifteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1327–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Trail I, Stanley D, Stanley J. Resurfacing elbow replacement arthroplasty. In: Morrey B, editor. The elbow. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 293–311.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kudo H, Iwano K. Total elbow arthroplasty with a non-constrained surface-replacement prosthesis in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:355–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Poll RG, Rozing PM. Use of the Souter–Strathclyde total elbow prosthesis in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:1227–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Roper BA, Tuke M, O’Riordan SM, Bulstrode CJ. A new unconstrained elbow. A prospective review of 60 replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:566–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tanaka N, Sakahashi H, Ishii S, Kudo H. Comparison of two types of ulnar component in type-5 Kudo total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:341–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Weiland AJ, Weiss AP, Wills RP, Moore JR. Capitellocondylar total elbow replacement. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:217–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Little CP, Graham AJ, Karatzas G, Woods DA, Carr AJ. Outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: comparative study of three implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2439–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Morrey B. Unlinked elbow replacement arthroplasty. In: Morrey B, An K, Spering J, editors. Joint replacement arthroplasty. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer Business; 2011:59–71.

  33. Brinkman JM, de Vos MJ, Eygendaal D. Failure mechanisms in uncemented Kudo type 5 elbow prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 7 of 49 ulnar components revised because of loosening after 2-10 years. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:263–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. In the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Head of department, Professor Toshifumi Ozaki), Okayama University, there is a small department named "Department of Medical Materials for Musculoskeletal Reconstruction" donated by the KYOCERA Medical Corporation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keiichiro Nishida.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 29 kb)

About this article

Cite this article

Nishida, K., Hashizume, K., Nasu, Y. et al. A 5–22-year follow-up study of stemmed alumina ceramic total elbow arthroplasties with cement fixation for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Orthop Sci 19, 55–63 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0492-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0492-0

Keywords

Navigation