Abstract
Background
We determined mid to long-term results of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) by use of unlinked elbow prostheses with solid alumina ceramic trochleae, and ceramic ulnar stems (stemmed Kyocera type I; SKC-I) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Patients and methods
Fifty-four elbows of 39 patients were available for detailed clinical and radiographic review after a follow-up period of at least 5 years. The mean follow-up period was 12.6 years (range 5–22 years). Clinical condition before and after surgery was assessed by use of a modified version of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS; 0–100 points) and a Japan Orthopaedic Association Elbow score (JOA score; 0–100 points). The radiographs were reviewed and loosening was defined as a progressive radiolucent line >1 mm wide that was completely circumferential around the prosthesis. Clinical records of post-operative events affecting the elbows were used for survival analysis of the prostheses using the Kaplan–Meier method.
Results
The average modified MEPS and JOA scores improved significantly from 39.7 ± 14.3 to 44.7 ± 9.4, respectively, pre-operatively, to 89.7 ± 15.4 and 83.1 ± 12.8, respectively, post-operatively (P < 0.0001). The functional assessment score also improved from 4.9 ± 2.8 to 8.5 ± 3.3 points (P < 0.0001). With loosening or implant revision defined as end points, the likelihood of survival of the prosthesis for up to 20 years was 92.6 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 85.6–100.0) or 86.3 % (95 % CI 75.0–97.6), respectively.
Conclusion
Satisfactory clinical results were obtained after TEA using SKC-I prostheses, which provided excellent pain relief and functional range of motion. The results of our study reveal the high reliability over a long period of the cemented SKC-I prosthesis with an alumina ceramic component.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Souter WA. Surgery of the rheumatoid elbow. Ann Rheum Dis. 1990;49(Suppl 2):871–82.
Gschwend N, Simmen BR, Matejovsky Z. Late complications in elbow arthroplasty. J Should Elb Surg. 1996;5:86–96.
Bernardino S. Total elbow arthroplasty: history, current concepts, and future. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29:1217–21.
Ewald FC, Simmons ED Jr, Sullivan JA, Thomas WH, Scott RD, Poss R, Thornhill TS, Sledge CB. Capitellocondylar total elbow replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:498–507.
Trail IA, Nuttall D, Stanley JK. Survivorship and radiological analysis of the standard Souter–Strathclyde total elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:80–4.
Landor I, Vavrik P, Jahoda D, Guttler K, Sosna A. Total elbow replacement with the Souter–Strathclyde prosthesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1460–3.
Tanaka N, Kudo H, Iwano K, Sakahashi H, Sato E, Ishii S. Kudo total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83-A:1506–13.
Kudo H, Iwano K, Nishino J. Total elbow arthroplasty with use of a nonconstrained humeral component inserted without cement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1268–80.
Morrey BF, Adams RA. Semiconstrained arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:479–90.
Gschwend N, Scheier NH, Baehler AR. Long-term results of the GSB III elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:1005–12.
Inoue H, Yokoyama Y, Tanabe G. Alumina ceramic elbow prosthesis. In: Hamalainen M, Hagena FW, editors. Rheumatoid arthritis surgery of the elbow. Basel: Karger; 1991. p. 78–87.
Larsen A, Dale K, Eek M. Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1977;18:481–91.
Ryu J, Saito S, Honda T, Oikawa H, Sakamoto A. A new total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. Japanese J Rheumatol. 1998;8:411–28.
Verstreken F, De Smet L, Westhovens R, Fabry G. Results of the Kudo elbow prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary report. Clin Rheumatol. 1998;17:325–8.
Tsuge K, Murakami T, Yasunaga Y, Kanujia R. Arthroplasty of the elbow. Twenty year’s experience of a new approach. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1987;69:116–20.
Souter WA. The evolution of total replacement arthroplasty of the elbow. In: Kashiwagi D, editor. Elbow Joint. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica; 1985. pp. 255–68.
Inoue H, Yokoyama Y, Sumii H. Elbow arthroplasty with ceramic prosthesis. Techniques Orthop. 1991;6:27–32.
Simmen BR, Bogoch ER, Goldhahn J. Surgery Insight: orthopedic treatment options in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008;4:266–73.
Ozaki T, Hashizume K, Nakahara R, Nishida K. Radiographic remodeling of the shoulder joint in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis after 4 years of treatment with etanercept. Mod Rheumatol. 2012;22:635–7.
Jazrawi LM, Kummer FJ, DiCesare PE. Alternative bearing surfaces for total joint arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6:198–203.
van der Lugt JC, Geskus RB, Rozing PM. Primary Souter–Strathclyde total elbow prosthesis in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86-A:465–73.
Potter D, Claydon P, Stanley D. Total elbow replacement using the Kudo prosthesis. Clinical and radiological review with five- to seven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:354–7.
Kelly EW, Coghlan J, Bell S. Five- to thirteen-year follow-up of the GSB III total elbow arthroplasty. J Should Elb Surg. 2004;13:434–40.
Gill DR, Morrey BF. The Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A ten to fifteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1327–35.
Trail I, Stanley D, Stanley J. Resurfacing elbow replacement arthroplasty. In: Morrey B, editor. The elbow. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 293–311.
Kudo H, Iwano K. Total elbow arthroplasty with a non-constrained surface-replacement prosthesis in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:355–62.
Poll RG, Rozing PM. Use of the Souter–Strathclyde total elbow prosthesis in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:1227–33.
Roper BA, Tuke M, O’Riordan SM, Bulstrode CJ. A new unconstrained elbow. A prospective review of 60 replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:566–9.
Tanaka N, Sakahashi H, Ishii S, Kudo H. Comparison of two types of ulnar component in type-5 Kudo total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:341–4.
Weiland AJ, Weiss AP, Wills RP, Moore JR. Capitellocondylar total elbow replacement. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:217–22.
Little CP, Graham AJ, Karatzas G, Woods DA, Carr AJ. Outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: comparative study of three implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2439–48.
Morrey B. Unlinked elbow replacement arthroplasty. In: Morrey B, An K, Spering J, editors. Joint replacement arthroplasty. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer Business; 2011:59–71.
Brinkman JM, de Vos MJ, Eygendaal D. Failure mechanisms in uncemented Kudo type 5 elbow prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 7 of 49 ulnar components revised because of loosening after 2-10 years. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:263–70.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. In the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Head of department, Professor Toshifumi Ozaki), Okayama University, there is a small department named "Department of Medical Materials for Musculoskeletal Reconstruction" donated by the KYOCERA Medical Corporation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Nishida, K., Hashizume, K., Nasu, Y. et al. A 5–22-year follow-up study of stemmed alumina ceramic total elbow arthroplasties with cement fixation for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Orthop Sci 19, 55–63 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0492-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0492-0