Skip to main content
Log in

Interscalene brachial plexus block for scapular and upper chest pain due to cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

Animal experiments have shown that one of the pathways for pain originating from the cervical spine is the sympathetic trunk. However, there have been few reports regarding the cervical pain pathway and efficacy of interscalene brachial plexus block for upper limb, scapular and chest pain originating in the cervical spine in clinical cases. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the efficacy of interscalene brachial plexus block for upper limb, scapular and chest pain.

Methods

Patients (137 men and 223 women) who had cervical radicular pain were studied. The intensity of upper limb, scapular and chest pain was measured by using a VAS before injection and at 5 min and 7 days after injection. To evaluate the efficacy of interscalene brachial plexus block, patients with cervical radicular pain who had received NSAIDs for at least 2 weeks were randomized to interscalene brachial plexus block or control block groups. VAS scores were compared to assess the effects of injection and the pain pathway.

Results

The average VAS score for upper limb pain with or without scapular and chest pain was significantly reduced by interscalene brachial plexus block compared with control block at 5 min and 7 days after injection. After interscalene brachial plexus block, 89 patients reported symptoms of stellate ganglion block versus no patients after control block. Scapular and chest pain was significantly reduced in the patients with stellate ganglion block compared to those without stellate ganglion block.

Conclusions

Interscalene brachial plexus block is useful for upper limb, scapular and chest pain due to disorders of the cervical spine. The scapular and chest pain pathway is more likely to be interrupted by an interscalene brachial plexus block that causes a stellate ganglion block compared to an interscalene brachial plexus block without stellate ganglion block.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schellhas K, Smith M, Gundry CR, Pollei SR. Cervical discogenic pain: prospective correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic subjects and pain sufferers. Spine. 1996;21:300–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Foerster O. The dermatomes in man. Brain. 1933;56:1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ammons WS. Characteristics of spinoreticular and spinothalamic neurons with renal input. J Neurophysiol. 1987;58:480–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cervero F, Connell LA, Lawson SN. Somatic and visceral primary afferents in the lower thoracic dorsal root ganglia of the cat. J Comp Neurol. 1984;228:422–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cervero F, Tattersall JE. Cutaneous receptive fields of somatic and viscerosomatic neurones in the thoracic spinal cord of the cat. J Comp Neurol. 1985;237:325–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruch TC. Pathophysiology of pain. In: Fulton JF, editor. A textbook of physiology. 17th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1955. p. 358–76.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yokota T, Koyama N, Nishikawa Y, Hasegawa A. Dual somatosensory representation of the periodontium in nucleus ventralis posteromedialis of the cat thalamus. Brain Res. 1988;475:187–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ikeda Y, Lee M, Ebata T, Ogasawara A. Application of interscalene brachial plexus block for upper extremity and shoulder girdle pain. Seikeigeka. 1993;44:1871–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Murakami H, Lee M, Mimura M, Ohtake Y, Ikeda Y. Application of interscalene brachial plexus block for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. 1997;48:1191–94.

  10. Winnie AP. Interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 1970;49:455–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohtori S, Takahashi K, Chiba T, Yamagata M, Sameda H, Moriya H. Sensory innervation of the cervical facet joints in rats. Spine. 2001;26:147–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Coleman MM, Chan VW. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46(3):209–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liguori GA, Zayas VM, YaDeau JT, Kahn RL, Paroli L, Buschiazzo V, Wu A. Nerve localization techniques for interscalene brachial plexus blockade: a prospective, randomized comparison of mechanical paresthesia versus electrical stimulation. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:761–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cloward RB. Cervical diskography: a contribution to the etiology and mechanism of neck, shoulder and arm pain. Ann Surg. 1959;150:1052–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dwyer A, Aprill C, Bogduk N. Cervical zygapophyseal joint pain patterns I: a study in normal volunteers. Spine. 1990;15:453–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fukui S, Ohseto K, Shiotani M, Ohno K, Karasawa H, Naganuma Y, Yuda Y. Referred pain distribution of the cervical zygapophyseal joints and cervical dorsal rami. Pain. 1996;68:79–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grubb SA, Kelly CK. Cervical discography: clinical implications from 12 years of experience. Spine. 2000;25:1382–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Slipman CW, Plastaras C, Patel R, Isaac Z, Chow D, Garvan C, Pauza K, Furman M. Provocative cervical discography symptom mapping. Spine J. 2005;5:381–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Malmqvist EL, Bengtsson M, Sorenson J. Efficacy of stellate ganglion block: a clinical study with bupivacaine. Reg Anesth. 1992;17:340–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Matsumoto S. Thermographic assessments of the sympathetic blockade by stellate ganglion (1): comparison between C7-SGB and C6-SGB in patients. Masui. 1991;40:562–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mastsumoto S. Thermographic assessment of the sympathetic blockade by stellate ganglion block (20): comparison between C7-SGB and C6-SGB in 20 healthy volunteers. Masui. 1991;40:692–701.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wilkinson H. Percutaneous radiofrequency, upper thoracic sympathectomy. New technique. Neurosurgery. 1984;15:811–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilkinson H. Neurosurgical procedures of the sympathetic nervous system. Pain Clin. 1995;1:43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parent A. Autonomic nervous system. In: Carpenter’s human neuroanatomy. 9th ed. Media: Wiliams & Wilkins; 1996. p. 293–320.

  25. Standring S. Antomic nervous system. In: Gray’s anatomy. 40th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2009. p. 232–6.

  26. McDonald JS, Pensak ML, Phero JC. Part II: thoughts on the management of chronic facial, head, and neck pain. Am J Oncol. 1990;11:378–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hogan QH, Abram SE. Neural blockade for diagnosis and prognosis: a review. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:216–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Uchida K, Tateda T, Hino H. Novel mechanism of action hypothesized for stellate ganglion block related to melatonin. Med Hypotheses. 2002;59:446–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuaki Murata.

About this article

Cite this article

Murata, Y., Kanaya, K., Wada, H. et al. Interscalene brachial plexus block for scapular and upper chest pain due to cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Orthop Sci 17, 515–520 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0248-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0248-2

Keywords

Navigation